3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
m
maxim333 16.11.19 11:56 pm

The graphics in the game (Crysis 3)

There is nobody not a secret that many have been waiting for crysis 3 because of the graphics. How do you like it? I personally did not see anything special. But I saw the lag...
119 Comments
Sort by:
-
-SlashuuR- 16.11.19

If you do not look at every screen that almost no difference.

F
FatalKib0rg 16.11.19

The graphics are good,certainly,but still not enough that would tilting the owners of powerful graphics cards that don't support DX 11.For example, the graphics card 8800 GT could run this part krayzisa,and on medium settings it would be possible to play a hundred percent!!!

D
DiLouk 16.11.19

Graphics 10 out of 10. I even have the second part downloaded again and compared. The third is much better. Crysis 3 is a new standard of graphics.

A
Azog 16.11.19

pure_gamer
it is not surprising that apart from the lag you saw nothing
for a comfortable game need минимумGTX 690

A
Azog 16.11.19

Insatiable63
after changing the resolution you want to restart the game
as well on screen, especially the difference is not visible

w
white64 16.11.19

Graphics are of course gorgeous, but I spit on optimization. And besides, the game is important, not the graphics, and gameplay.

s
steamus97 16.11.19

The graphics are just gorgeous, the texture is very clearly drawn. The gameplay is also great

l
lelikmp 16.11.19

I have no problems on max (on ultra)

D
Denis Kyokushin 16.11.19

I noticed that the user with the nickname Insatiable63 sales on low with MSAAx8 anti-aliasing eats almost 4Gb of VRAM?

K
Krym_NASh 16.11.19

lelikmp
Vertical sync off and see how will be the resources to eat the game. Anisotropic filtering x16 at all possible to put on even the weakest PC.

K
Krym_NASh 16.11.19

Sucks at top speed in multiplayer play ,due to the fact that when hiding in the bushes all you see ))

A
Alexander Bekker 16.11.19

On the GTX 750 Ti gives an average of 30-35 FPS on maximum settings without anti-aliasing in Full HD. In the premises sometimes for 5-10 FPS more. Drawdown of up to 25 personnel in extremely hot scenes. No matter what anyone said, optimization is excellent. I can even compare with GTA V, despite the fact that the difference in graphics is huge.

k
kamaz360 16.11.19

Fade Baker
something like that for your config is not enough fps. My system Amd phenom 2 x4 925, radeon r7 260x oc 1 gb 1, 4 gb. C monitor resolution 1400*900 gives at max and partially ultra with anti-aliasing 30 - 47 fps in independence in the premises or on the ship with the rain.

k
kamaz360 16.11.19




A
Alexander Bekker 16.11.19

kamaz360
Well, first, you have 1440x900. Second, almost all settings on high. Of course, FPS will be more. I have requirements for the card above because of the greater resolution and settings, but the FPS is only slightly below yours.

k
kamaz360 16.11.19

Fade Baker
well, in the areas you have subsidence hard... about 5-10 fps... I have below 30 is not omitted.

A
Alexander Bekker 16.11.19

kamaz360
Any drawdown at all? Ass read?
>In rooms, sometimes 5-10 FPS more

J
Jackil_Lovecraft 16.11.19

Not understand fun with the game, at the time, was it on the built-in PERC vidyuhi who are 6 years and was fine on medium-high settings. Now decided to re-take the whole series and gtx960(4gb), came to the forest the fps does not rise above 20 at all settings, wonders.

p
pavloalex 16.11.19

In General, I tried this benchmark on my build, and Monica, as the result: everything on ultra+ full 4K HDR, flies and well, just wildly beautiful.
Damn, who would have thought, the game for years, and it still requires hoo!
But the game is worth the candle, in my opinion, for the beauty, not the picture.