3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
l
loke2014 10.03.22 12:10 am

Which is better to buy GTX 960 or R9 280x?

This is the choice. GTX 960 or R9 280x. And I decided about the processor FX-8320)
78 Comments
Sort by:
M
MunchkiN 616 10.03.22

only if the 960 has 4
gigabytes, if there is no better 280x, but on performance it is worse, here

T
Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix 10.03.22

loke2014
Take 280X if the PSU allows. Do not listen to the nonsense that it is weaker than the 960th. If even 285 does it in half of the tests, then 280X - even more so.

l
loke2014 10.03.22

Tellery Spyro-Cynder
Mix

l
loke2014 10.03.22

MunchkiN 616 Are
any gadgets in the form of fur or good smoothing available for the GTX 960?

l
loke2014 10.03.22

MunchkiN 616
I just don't know before that I was only AMD

M
ManowaR 10.03.22

Definitely 280x.960 is inferior to it, even with 4 gigs. Yes, there are new technologies, with a smaller bus it is almost on a par with 256 bits.

G
GONE TO DTF 10.03.22

look at loke2014
tests of the latest games and draw your own conclusions.

X
Xjax85 10.03.22

loke2014
Don't get into that "Nvidia" swamp, it was both. Only Nvidia has one problem, it likes to cut performance with firewood since the early 2000s, some people just noticed it)))

T
Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix 10.03.22

lookaway
tests of the latest games,
take a look and draw your own conclusions.

loke2014
Nobody directly compares them. You can google the first five reviews.

M
ManowaR 10.03.22

Xjax85
Precisely, they quickly write off "old" video cards with firewood. AMD has, of course, the same thing, but the process is much slower.

M
MKUltra 10.03.22

280x in almost all games is faster than 960. In The Witcher 3 they are approximately equal, in GTA 5 280x gives 10 fps more, as in Wolfenstein and DAI, which is about 20%.
And if you decide to transfer to Nvidia, then the 960 is clearly not the best option.

l
loke2014 10.03.22

King of the World
ManowaR
Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix
Xjax85
lookaway
Thank you all! I chose R9 280x.PS King of the World-If I find money I'll take R9 290)

B
Belomorkanal 10.03.22

loke2014
Definitely not a GTX960 stump. If you choose specifically from these two, then 280X.
All in all, I don't recommend either one. It’s better to scrape together 17-18k no matter how and take the R9 290 (at least a reference) and not regret later that you sold cheap. The difference in price between 280X and 290 pays off with a difference in performance, because 290 is a head more powerful, but you also need a non-acid PSU.
So if you can afford to overestimate the budget, then take 290, you will not regret it. If you can not afford it, then take the 280X.

Xjax85
"Don't get into that "Nvidia" swamp, it was both. Only Nvidia has one problem, likes to chop down the performance with firewood since the early 2000s, some people just noticed)))"
Evidence? Data? Or will you remain unfounded?

T
Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix 10.03.22

loke2014
No way. Don't forget to send us a price list with a selection of videos. A lot also depends on the manufacturer.

i
insel 10.03.22

Of all the video cards that I bought, I consider Gigabyte to be the best. they have super cooling and overclocking more than other companies.
Now I use two GTX 970 G1 Gaming from Gigabyte. In my opinion, this is the best card for this price (22k ​​rubles)
, before that there was an AMD 290x from Gigabyte, but I like Nvidia more.
By the way, the cards are silent =)
who has the money, I recommend the gigabyte company and the gtx 970 cards

B
Belomorkanal 10.03.22

insel
If up to 970 were 290X, then why change at all? Covered with 290X?
And why, pardon the expression, a member of your PSU for 1800 watts???

l
loke2014 10.03.22

Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix
Personally I'll throw it to you!

X
Xjax85 10.03.22

Belomorkanal
So it was, so there is a different performance on each firewood))) and this is 2002, but old firewood makes new phaaa) I don’t remember this on AMD since 2007.
http://nvworld.ru/files/old/docs/windetonator.html
2014 And things are still there, a direct driver comparison and installation simulator, phahaa)
http://www.overclockers.ru/lab/60458/Sravnenie_proizvoditelnosti_drajverov_NVIDIA_GeForce_334.x_i_337 .x_pri_pomoschi_FCAT.html

L
Lisstoman 10.03.22

insel
Gigabytes are the poorest. They fly just amazing. The quality has dropped a lot. They make more noise than almost all competitors. Overclocking from the factory from gigabytes often crashes drivers. And you can overclock it with your hands.
Now you can only take asus or msi. The best COs on the market and reliability. but asus is more expensive than msi because of the brand

T
Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix 10.03.22

Lisstoman I will
support, because the other day I was picking up a broken R9 270 performed by Gigi from repair. Got married.
Even here to compare the GTS 450 in their performance - mercy! Beautiful shroud, effective CO, overclocking... And to compare the R9 270 in their performance: poor 110 mm fans, just fear that they are ugly exposed outside the radiator, not covered by any shroud. Just a plate of a radiator, and coolers are stuck to them from above. And under the radiator is very clogged with dust. That is, it turns out WindForce has lost its one of the main features - self-cleaning.
It is present on the GTS 450. I removed the card a year ago to move to a new building (so it was not removed even from 2011 to 2014) - I was pleasantly surprised by its cleanliness.