Rx 6700 xt does not produce normal fps in light games
So I bought myself an rx 6700 xt sapphire gaming pulse. I installed firewood, demolished the old Nvidev ones.configured in the driver. I went into cyberpunk and on ultra settings it gives out 80+ fps, and the same amount on minimal settings. Then, for fun, I went to test in such games as minecraft, cs, pubg. And in all these games something amazing happens. in cs more than 200 fps does not rise, although when I had a gtx 1060 6 gb I played quietly at 350 fps. Mine 150 fps (I think this is normal with this process), pubg ultra 75-80 with drawdowns and also at the minimum. Plus, I launched far cry 6. In tests in 2k, people have 75+ fps with rays, and I have 70 on ultra settings without rays in full hd resolution with drawdowns up to 50. I don’t know what this could be connected with. It seems that the percent is not so bad, and where does the percent, if everything was fine on the last vidyuhi. Can you advise something?:
har-ki pc:
KHG228
First you need to find out how much the video card is loaded and how much the processor is loaded during the game?
Write in a search engine, How to set the Radeon graphics card for maximum performance.
KHG228 remove the firewood from the system again using DDU and reinstall by selecting only the driver without the Radeon software. If there is no difference again, try to fix the frequencies through the MSI afterberner
TopPCGamer
Do you want to say there is no other option, except to buy a new percent?
TopPCGamer
yes, and yes, if he really sat on a bottle, he would have fought under 100
In cyber, you can even see from the screen that a hundred percent is hammering.
I dug up a test of your processor in fk6, similarly, the emphasis is on percent even with a weaker card - 2060s and at high, not ultra settings, the card is underloaded by cd.
SpoilerIn the lane, in principle, it is difficult to load such a video with such a percentage, what is loaded and what is not, and you can clearly see the temperatures.
Why do you have less fps in online competitive games, there is one factor, but I won’t voice it so as not to offend anyone again: D
By the way, I still don’t understand, do you have one bar for 8 or is it 2 by 8?
and why does the cs give out barely 200 fps with hard drawdowns, when at 1060 it was almost 400.
And in general, should I panic or is it too early?
KHG228
400 fps was in the game or on the benchmark card? I just looked at the tests of 9400 in the current counter and obviously on the same d2 it doesn’t even smell like 400 fps, 200-250, in skirmishes it can drop up to 180. 300+ if you only look at the sky, the floor or the edge of the map.
You should not panic, but if you are going to play 1080p with this video and want a lot of fps, then you should think about changing the processor, this 9400 does not even reach the R5 3600.
Loken
I say that in the cs after changing the vidyuhi it became generally unplayable from 100 to 150 fps + drawdowns up to 80 and sublag. Moreover, these are minimum wages and 4:3 resolution.
Yesterday I tried to go as a partner so she generally decided to send me to hell. Stupid when loading the map took off. I reinstalled the game several times, checked the integrity of the files, set the launch options that were advised, and fucking. I didn't have that with my last vidyuhi.
KHG228
You made the mistake of buying a counter radik, what else can I tell you :D Red cards have always done kudasai in games like dota and contra against green competitors. The problem here is in the AMD software, not in the card. You can somehow smooth this out (not drastically) by buying a more powerful percent. If FPS in counter is important to you, it's better to hand over the card to where you bought it and take the card from the green ones.
For those who want to argue - compare the performance in cs: go, for example, with 12400 + 1660ti versus 12400 + 6700xt. Between cards 50% power is in favor of 6700xt, but with 1660ti fps is much higher.
Spoiler
Loken
So you want to say that with such a vidyuhi and a process like mine, the cop at the minimum and in 4: 3 resolution should give out 150 fps with friezes? I think this is nonsense.
KHG228
What difference does it make what resolution or ratio you set, 4:3 or 21:9, if the card is not loaded anyway. Read what I wrote above.
See what fps the config gives at 5600+6700xt
But what gives 5600+3060
Video cards are underloaded here and there, and the fps is almost 2 times different.
From 6700xt on a zigzag fps drops to 300, and from 3060 to 600. Magic.
With a relatively weak processor and slow memory, this problem gets out even more.
KHG228 did
you see your temperature?
are you cooling it down? piece of foil?
change cool.
well, or for starters, change the termuhu and see what happens
Here is a farcry test with the same components and the picture is more satisfactory than mine
KHG228
He has a memory of 2666, not 2400. This is + 5-10% in fc at 9400.
When riding a horse, his fps drops in places to 76, which means that in cities or by car it will be even lower.
Vidyakha is just as underloaded, because the emphasis is on the percentage / memory.
Record your test showing the settings and displaying AB, in the same locations and the same conditions as in this video, that is, without cities, without cars, on some forest roads.