The rules of Fair pvp restart. (Diablo 2)

but the other rules were in discussion, and so, was not augmented in Topeka! although the rules which were used in discussion like this... but then again no tube top.

ROMCHA1994
Enough absorbit one element to be dishonest player against at least one opponent. And what makes you think that it is impossible to negate the 3 elements? Possible.

Enough absorbit one element to be dishonest player against at least one opponent.
Is solved very simply - either play TVT 4x4, or a tournament where it is forbidden to change between fights. Won one leaked the other, and the resentment of I zaabel as the ban does not affect the final statistics.

And what makes you think that it is impossible to negate the 3 elements? Possible.
If it is three elements, one of sorcy-trestieni, then perhaps Yes (but I would not began to argue, all carefully not checking). Three well-dressed and pumped agnostic - definitely not.

firkax
you're wrong paladin killer forty quietly dressed against 3 well pumped odnolineynyh forty

Why the patient stopped taking your medication?

G-gurdaXII not sick of me, sick of you sir! Looks like you Oldies without pothila and teleport began delirium tremens, and from there, emerods far. =)

firkax that I mean, you can dress well against.. well.. the same element or two, but that is fully dressed, it must be very rare armor + any of the torch and of course a full resistance, but again, due to the fact that admin again drop castrated, almost all go in rags. And Yes.. all are gaining resistance as you can and spit at the rules.

Absorb need deny, allow cold absorb only against cold forty.

I've been thinking about the rules, decided that such disputes are not acceptable (a reference to Adventure time =)) I look at threads like mine and look at it like little kids playing soldiers and debate the type of it's not fair!, I killed you! No I love you! and so on. and so. everyone wants to tweak the rules for myself, the admin seem to had offered on the service because everyone does what he wants, moderators out to your homies like he played by the rules, and you're a whiner" and throws the ban, is banned for 3-5 players at a time! And chat emoticons together rivet. Yes... that's it fair...

about spirit breccia soran.

Again Double standards banks have banned, but can be life replenish, then runs around passivity Locka, OPA and then HP is full, and modernization turns a blind eye. As for me if it is forbidden hill, it is necessary to ban all sources of Hilo.
About the old rules banning frosty aura paladin, is not justified a ban, although I can guess why, but in this case it is necessary to prohibit and cold the Sorka.
Banned charmy on the poison is not justified, if you play with the ban it turns out only three of Chara capable of start poison. assasine, necromancer and druid, and the druid wins on damage and Yes... the same druid in the inventory will still be charmy on the poison that's a fact.

And Yes.. no ONE has SUBSTANTIATED that he specifically did not like in my proposed rules. I agree the game on normal or nightmare garbage

And Yes.. no ONE has SUBSTANTIATED that he specifically did not like in my proposed rules.
Roma, bro, just no one takes you seriously.

ROMCHA1994 wrote:
Again Double standards banks have banned, but can replenish life
it is limited (5 minutes 35репл fills 1025хп~(considering the fact that you just cause damage and pvp will end up a five-minute period = 1-2 banks on HP, it's not so critical))
21. Prohibited replenish life more than 35.
ROMCHA1994 wrote:
modernization and turn a blind eye
will take place 5 minutes after the start of pvp - moderator will stop the fight and will move to another location where there is no possibility of such liability
ROMCHA1994 wrote:
About the old rules banning frosty aura paladin, is not justified a ban, although I can guess why, but in this case it is necessary to prohibit and cold the Sorka.
holy freeze is prohibited not only to the paladin
the essence of the prohibition is that one cannot reduce the attack speed of the enemy
cannot be frozen does not work against holy freeze
ROMCHA1994 wrote:
Banned charmy on the poison is not justified
if you collect 37 czarnikow on 451пдмг(16687дмг), and even the main attack will be powerful - get IMBA pvp character
ROMCHA1994 wrote:
with the ban it turns out only three of Chara capable of start poison. assasine, necromancer and druid
Amazon forgot
ROMCHA1994 wrote:
the same druid in the inventory will still be charmy on the poison that's a fact
will not

ROMCHA1994 wrote:
I've been thinking about the rules, decided that such disputes are not acceptable
those rules about which you wrote more suitable for fishing-pvp and TVT sometimes under fire, but not under fire pvp
if you are interested to develop TVT battle, and then propose some rules to balance it quite an interesting idea))
go ahead))

Well basically I want to revive the tvt, but the people somehow languidly go. Thought to have locomotives povybivat runak and like the prize at the end of the tvt but I need to download a Persian at the classics, thought Sorka two-stihima (Orb/the jenča) but not even 1 of the act on Halle go, I think swing necro-Bonera can ride?

I was thinking of... and it was pvp on classic? no rune words, no pozhela and teleport?

Modernization is unlikely to raise the theme of my fair tvt in the topic. Sorry... I wanted at least some diversity in the game, not to watch eternal pruning drop the admin...

ROMCHA1994
in order to write the balance for TVT games, you must first understand pvp
most of the rules that you suggested, to put it mildly, was absurd)), which says that in pvp you don't really understand what was happening))
ROMCHA1994 wrote:
how was pvp in classic? no rune words, no pozhela and teleport?
sora > all

I agree with the wording of the rules I have is not so hot, but the message I think is clear