Where You learn the news?
Actually, where You learn the news? On news sites, on television, radio, in Newspapers, in magazines, from friends?
Determinant wrote:
In short, no harm in the opposition media no one benefits and well-being for all.
Words not the boy, but her husband. Respect...
Alextar wrote:
Not convinced.
Then maybe you should look in your own wallet?
S wrote:
In the village 5 pieces catches, but in different parts of the city no TV no mood, nothing
Baby, come on. I even the toilet shows just slightly open the cover - Vova Solov'ev-Svistunov, Dima-milk and Honey and other telepitesi in all its glory.
News on 1. In the morning at 6:30 before work. Day Internet. On TV discovery, and the match!
Alexfor
Alextar wrote:
don't understand meaning of your previous comments
Well, with this and had to start - lack of understanding of the underlying assumptions for the perfectly explains your subsequent shizophrenia.
Determinants
I agree, still difficult to communicate with a person who consciously does not want to understand me. Then why even write to me?
S wrote:
3-4 years ago from the TV refused
The mind is not increased. You have a TV in my head.
Alexfor
Alextar wrote:
Then why even write to me?
I, frankly, was wondering what is behind this incoherent set of words :
Alextar wrote:
that is, the alternative media write that all cattle just because you're a redneck and agree with this because they can be trusted?
but it seems that you already own is not able to decipher it.
Determinants
hmmmm, you refuse to understand the obvious. And pretend that it's my problem. How so?
Alexfor
Alextar wrote:
And pretend that it's my problem.
Yes, God forbid. You just wrote a bunch of words, incomprehensible to anyone but you. I see this as no problem at all.
Masha
Masha wrote:
The mind is not increased. You have a TV in my head.
shta?
you always try first in the theme to fit where Russia criticized you what's wrong with that? for a dose of it seems like enough
Determinants
Determinant wrote:
Echo Matzo
Determinant wrote:
the audience is a little more discerning
I haven't laughed...
Determinant wrote:
Well, if anyone a bit savvy of this locksmith, he heard plenty of alternative news, will pace, with a proudly raised nose-because he is not a redneck, and a smart knowledgeable person, with critical thinking, so it is not provides
And this is the right conclusion. There is nothing more safer than modern liberals who get emotional discharge in news resources - povorchu and calm down. Well or blown on useless rally to wave banners - as a maximum. And it's wonderful, so they do not capture political discourse, at least not fully and not as quickly as it was in the West. Otherwise it will decline.
Gauguin
Gauguin wrote:
There is nothing more safer than modern liberals
It's true: against the background of exalted fanatics of any lofty ideas that, in trying to escape from the burden of worthlessness, rush to all living things who do not share their views, as patients, epileptic animals, modern liberals , of course, a very safe category of citizens.
Gauguin wrote:
that get an emotional discharge in these news resources
And you can find out what, specifically, claims to matzah regarding the urgent news? It happens regularly discovered some kind of malicious lie? Maybe give examples? Or, as usual, restrict ourselves to the unfounded statements?
S
You are so smart. Is somewhere to thicken the darkness deadlocking debate, right here occurs your cold scalpel sharp mind. With the precision of an experienced surgeon you are operating disparate thoughts your obedient servants, with the wisdom of a seasoned philosopher pierce deep understanding of the position of each speaker, but being a man of manifold intellectually accomplished, climb over them, and eventually fill the space around you is a synthesis of bright new ideas, to spray the lenses extraordinary in its depth of wisdom, provide an example of meaningful,useful, comprehensive argumentation, light for the lost in the darkest depths of disputes the way with the radiance of your pure mind like a rainbow in the dark.
Determinants
Determinant wrote:
It's true: against the background of exalted fanatics of any lofty ideas
Well, they were not discussed, but they are infinitely superior to liberals, if it comes to that. Even if we are talking about Muslims, they departed from the truth of Christ, but in guhayna sense is still superior to many modern white folks, sadly to admit this fact. Respect for the opponent also has not been canceled.
Determinant wrote:
And you can find out what, specifically, claims to matzah regarding the urgent news?
Too much content for specifics. In short - ordinary soup set Russian liberachi, i.e., der untermensch.
S
Determinant wrote:
...with the radiance of your pure mind like a rainbow in the dark.
Baby, like, the dude digs you.
Spoiler you despise, let him oblamalsya, Isho article did not come until the language for the girls.
Gauguin
Gauguin wrote:
ordinary soup set Russian liberachi, i.e., der untermensch.
I looked at the first list in the recipe
http://www.polit.nnov.ru/2012/05/02/sup/
there is no der untermensch.
explain?