Where You learn the news?
Actually, where You learn the news? On news sites, on television, radio, in Newspapers, in magazines, from friends?Have Vilcacora on YouTube)
In General, the news is not interested. Politocrats in the trash
Gauguin
Gauguin wrote:
Too much content for specifics
Anticipated
Determinant wrote:
as usual, we restrict unfounded statements
however, to predict such an outcome was easy: after all, to invent, proud nose, and then , even more proudly holding his tail with buttocks, to leave your corporate identity, Karetnik you sort.
However, I you, old friend, as usual, will help a great example: here is another, but obviously not less spiritual than you, people have spent a revelatory work (the credibility of this monumental work is confirmed by the first lines in Yandex on the topic "lies in the echo of Moscow). https://nstarikov.ru/blog/15435 Passing on his moral page, we see at once very informative, professional criticism. The Great patriot of the Fatherland, Nikolai Starikov, a man obviously very serious, and to perform the set before himself the task was approached with all due seriousness: "Day 13 of February, I specifically went to their website to write this small article. Long search for materials I had. Here's the scans from the main page, not even proistanai to the end." Next really is a scan. "Let us examine briefly these examples how the manipulation of consciousness." Then really there is analysis of the quotes. But, this is awkward: from the view of an officer and a gentleman (crossed out) patriot and intellectual slipped in that he examines not contnet Echo and quotes with banner InoPressa , that is , quotes from a site that collects what we writes about the foreign press. The level of professionalism of intelligence is the desire to a standing ovation.
Example in this example, of course, not what people write "revelatory" article about "matsu" is, of course, just mercenaries, money does not smell. But what is the opinion of these authors have about the mental state of its Central Asia, this "work" makes you wonder.
Krucinski the quiet badass
Well why are you firing something, man!
Not when you do not understand how so puts here is not driven by the wind,so delicate aesthetes with nicknames from matimatiki.With such a sharp mind and a sharp smart style?
Not a Stalker figure is more interesting.
The specifics of my work suggests the presence in its information field a sufficient amount of resources to really important events of the past me did not pass. The source is not as important, because the dry fact of what happened something odinakov all of them. It is important to abstract from the surrounding arguments about good/bad and interesting conspiracy theories. Because let's be honest, for the last you refer to establish a kind of truth that you are, in fact, do not care, but for a particular set of emotions felt when (based on previous reviews) view analytical show on Federal channels or read articles ardent liberals in geisecke. Emotions are great, but they pass quickly, and the head much. And with such huge volumes of information pouring into us daily of the unfortunate, the ability of separating the important parts from the accompanying noise is quite useful, I advise everyone to develop it. Then the question where to meet with the news will not be so acute.
It's not Themes, and the classic marketing survey, and well paid. Admins, call a spade a spade
simikular
Here bots work. For example in this thread, half of the bots, and possibly more.
At a public forum of Talk. Love to read Swalker, Gaguine, Requiem and other political bloggers on PG. Only here can you discover the truth. All the rest of the media is a fiction.
News postsovka a lever to invoke a primitive fear, especially if we talk about geopolitics. Just analyze their content and count the ratio of bad/good.