The question of performance.
Hi all.Faced the following problem:
There are 2 computer. First: I7 4770K, GTX 1080, 8 operatives, SSD for Windows, hdd for games. Second: I5 3570, HD7870, 8 operatives, hdd for Windows and games.
On the second computer I bought a video card RTX 2070. Battlefield 1 on this configuration gives an average of 30-40 fps at a resolution of 1920x1080, rarely rises to 60-70. In Overwatch there is no stable 60 fps, is around 50-55. The graphics settings I unscrewed everything on ultra, tried to twist below, but strong growth is only minimal.
On the first computer no such problems. Battlefield 1 70-120 fps, Overwatch 100+.
In turn rearranged from the first computer to the second components (RAM, hard disk + SSD, power supply). Reversed vidyuhi (on the ground with 2070 all OK, the second with 1080 still low fps). The growth has given the SSD+HDD, but only in Overwatch.
And here's the question: is the i5 3570 does not pull igrulya? I looked on YouTube VIDOS in this percent and 1070 people have 70-100фпс? In what may be the problem?
SPR1GGAN wrote:
...black list ,so his posts were not visible...
This is only possible in PM - it's either be patient, or just his posts don't read.
LIGHTandDARK4 wrote:
...percent of 4 cores 8 threads nowadays almost starting slivatsya...
Depends what games, what video and at what resolutions.
...is the i5 4690k... for a Grand give...
A couple of years ago would have taken with pleasure - now senior Devil's Canyon is.
The difference between these permissions to load some not very big...
3 686 400 pixels (2560x1440) / 2 073 600 pixels (1920x1080) ~ 1.77... (almost 2 times). This difference is not very big?
SonyK. wrote:
This is only possible in PM - it's either be patient, or just his posts don't read.
Yes, I do not read,just wanted to all have faded into oblivion
çelik Neher fumbles ,collected kakoeto course instead of the normal PC builds himself an expert ,2 1080 ,sly, dead technology ,instead of 1 1080ti,what nasal there RAM, how many got in and now tells everyone that if percent worse than i9 99999 ,he pulls nothing ,the whole point of his posts
SPR1GGAN wrote:
I picked up some piece of something instead of the normal PC builds himself an expert... in a sly ,dead technology... why nasal there operativki how much got...
Well, I wouldn't be so critical without knowing for what purposes (other than games) he uses the computer - maybe he just needs to work, etc. On a large quantity of RAM to use the RAM disk (one of variants). And so, if a person has the ability (and judging by the configuration, it is) - why not collect a computer.
...tells everyone that if percent worse than i9 99999 ,he pulls nothing ,the whole point of his posts...
Happens with people is called snickering...
LIGHTandDARK4
4670k 1070 2k resolution ,all max except clouds....Yes,the CPU is sticking to the weave well, the card ships....So 4 core is still in the ranks....
Yoba1212 wrote:
I have a 7700 in the plans for the future
What are your future plans with this percent??????? He'll turn into what now represents i3!!! I hope you're kidding!
SonyK. wrote:
Depends what games, what video and at what resolutions.
Yeah, and old school games.... in the old permissions! I agree with you)))
SonyK. wrote:
3 686 400 pixels (2560x1440) / 2 073 600 pixels (1920x1080) ~ 1.77... (almost 2 times). This difference is not very big?
Exactly. I have a difference of 5-8 fps. I think it's nothing. But 4k, Yes. The difference is phenomenal!
SPR1GGAN wrote:
builds himself an expert ,2 1080 ,sly, dead technology ,instead of 1 1080ti,what nasal there RAM, how many got in and now tells everyone that if percent worse than i9 99999 ,he pulls nothing ,the whole point of his posts
With your junk Percent intelCore i7-3770 4.2 Ghz Vidyuhi NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Operativa:16 gigs - I generally keep quiet))))
instead of 1 1080ti
Bug ha, which is much worse)))
So its 1080ti shove away. If two 1080 is equal to one 2080ti! And something where its hard to beat! LOL
2 1080 ,sly, dead technology
He then realized that what I said?)))))
I'd like to see you on one 1080ti play these games at 4k. Kokoko!
SPR1GGAN wrote:
what nasal there RAM, how many got
I forgot to say. On the second computer I have 64 Gb.
And??? More questions?
Because the memory bought on sale to work.
dobro4insky
dobro4insky wrote:
Yes,the CPU is sticking to the hundred
WHAT WE WANTED TO PROVE!
These percent - the iron echo of those times.
dobro4insky
Test old krayzis 3 and realize that already at the time they become office gags.
SonyK.
SonyK. wrote:
Let's not with the theme pull
I'm not off the topic.She means you too.Well,that video you posted.Your card needs to give more FPS, if not 90-120,but more at the maximum:
Something in your system is not working,i7 4790 – CPU strong. And the solution you have below, and maximum FPS less.Try to drive the RAM.If overclocking,will increase
LIGHTandDARK4 wrote:
...I have a difference of 5-8 fps...
Do you - does not mean that everyone will do the same.
[Denis] wrote:
I'm not off the topic.She and you too...
For indirectly - not I wrote about slow performance. About the bottleneck to your system know - would the extra money, updated a long time ago.
...Your map needs to give more FPS...
I have a map with a small factory overclocked (GV-N960IXOC-4GD); to drive her, percents, the RAM, etc. don't want the old power supply and weak motherboard - I have not rested these few frames, if the acceleration the faster they will break and have to buy a new one. By the way don't forget the OS (the author of the video did not specify) and the driver - he's older, and it so happens that on the newer frame-rate below. Besides, he wrote with ShadowPlay (no idea in what format) with quality ...1080p 30mb/s 30fps and I built-in Afterburner (4.5.0.12819) a"wee with N. 264 (60 fps) and the highest possible quality settings within the program - load on the graphics card can vary. To transfer the load record from the GP to the CPU reluctance.
Spoiler
P. S. I Congratulate all with coming new year and wish you all the best!
dobro4insky
There's no SLi. To comfortably play this game on the beyond the game in 4k, the minimum necessary 2080ti, and better Titan rtx. So do not install it.
LIGHTandDARK4
But in vain....just your processor is not far from there, will leave 4670/90 ...personally Tested....My 9700k@4900 also at some points under 100%...
dobro4insky
I remember playing on 4690k - everywhere and everywhere was 100% zarazka percent in the Assassin Origins. Lags, freezes, brakes, crashes. And in the Odyssey, so it would be a slide show with 4690k.
Now the Origins one is at 8700k. And how will 2080ti, it will be possible to play Odyssey. The game is over demanding!
LIGHTandDARK4 wrote:
The game is over demanding!
I would call it not startremodeling and sorrivoli in terms of optimization. There is nothing special in terms of graphics. I installed it, the benchmark ran and deleted her. That Odyssey that origins - what treshak, damn it.
-SK.art-
Why deleted? The origins I played 590 hours. The game turned out great.
LIGHTandDARK4 wrote:
Why deleted? The origins I played 590 hours.
the origins I deleted after in the beginning came out of the cave, sat on the camel and rode off. That was enough for me) Not at all hooked up to the game, like all of the assassin. I only passed the first and second part completely. An hour and a half into the third played well, but unity hour. All. The series died for me. But Odysseus is only for benchmarks set. Saw that this likeness does not support SLI, removed after benchmark..