Protsessorostroeniya graphics settings (Assassin's Creed: Odyssey)

MagicHero
Launched Odyssey on your confine.The beginning looks promising:
Spoiler

MagicHero
MagicHero
Well now, no sense to take to IKS. In my town at least. 6K difference over the 5 APF medium or maximum... and when it's 100+ with the rules videhoe... is currently) IMHO, a stupid decision. He broke up about the same thing received) is Easier then already to add to regripper and generally smear)) Well about the stones and their selection may well be true. But then TDP just above the x's and all, better acceleration. 100 MB 200 MHz it stronger, it is 5-10 frames when you have 100+)))

Zevs72ru
Zevs72ru wrote:
But then TDP just above the x's and all, better acceleration. 100 MB 200 MHz it stronger, it is 5-10 frames when you have 100+)))
So in some games 2700 without X is now the minimum fps below 60. The assassin in the dispersal of 0.1% of the time the average minimum 35 and 1% - 58 have ikavoi version 53 and 66 respectively. And it only gets worse.
Zevs72ru wrote:
In my town at least. 6K difference.
Like citylink is everywhere and there is a difference of order 3K and hope took not the boxed version but without the box and separately bought a cooler because the boxed cooler only for beauty and good.
Zevs72ru wrote:
Easier then to add to regripper and generally smear))
If you about games then it is simply the most STUPID decision. Regripper worth buying if you work behind a computer for gaming for its price it is definitely better to take Intel.

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
And this does not mean that the person is playing with such FPS.
This means that there are friezes and smooth images through the fault of the CPU not the graphics card.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
I'll just take the Intel and show the same numbers (and even worse).
Even if there was not subsidence, percent loaded under a hundred. It's actually a miracle that even a 4-core to 8 mass percent of Intel holds such a fps, because rayzen 4 cores - 8 threads everything is much sadder, much sadder... there is not even average how Intel the 1% in there as a minimum of 0.1%. )))

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Yeah, not in this case, and in loading areas and working HDD. Talk about a smooth picture, don't forget to talk about the requirement in the SSD minimum. The result of one, another controversy out of nothing just test"components.
No matter in the processor.
Actually for any loading may be lag but the game is loaded into RAM it is not strange at startup and then if you need to load the game do not freeze and if you make pozarska it is smooth and not noticeable, or already with the boot screen ka kV fallout 4 when entering, even in a small house.
And so, in games that test not run for hours and the entire test takes place without any podzagruzok. Here you can look

Here all the parts are the same but on the Intel drawdown less even if you compare 12 threaded Intel with 16 stream 12 stream better. Well, the Riesen just drained because of his brakes inside of the tire and Yes SSD HDD nothing to do with it. SSD in games only affects the download speed, fps does not add at all, unless the RAM is sufficient because if the game starts instead of the Opera to use the screw or slesnick then there is will freezes in any case.

VOVAN WOLF
OMG according to your crazy conclusions as in VIDOS, it turns out that the faster the processor the faster the hard drive ))) do you realize the nonsense which is trying to sell to? Ie 8700К according to the subsidence hard disk works much faster than on AMD ))) and so on tests minimum fps of everyone who does it, the sooner the percent the faster it turns the screw and works on the Intel hard drive or SSD are faster than AMD ))) that to such a delusional conclusion we came. And the fact that new locations need to be processed percent of new drakely, it is the little things, the MAIN TEXTURE )))

MagicHero
Response OMG. As the curve You draw conclusions, how is it possible to write all described and discussed. The game is on the HDD, and the data is loaded the same with him. Uploading of the terrain and the territory happens to him, there is a cache has a read speed. Smoother the game runs on a SSD, the speed of read / write data ABOVE.
MagicHero wrote:
that to such a delusional conclusion we came
Surprisingly, You came, I didn'T. I'm not the aisles.

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
all described and discussed. The game is on the HDD, and the data is loaded the same with him. Uploading of the terrain and the territory happens to him, there is a cache has a read speed
Did you read above what I wrote?? I wrote there that the faster percents, the less drawdown on the minimum fps and HOW do YOU EXPLAIN THIS??? type faster than percent the faster the screw??? the Riesen or just not compatible with the screws and so they have dips in fps ))))))))))) In a test system all the screws and SSD are the same.

Just explain why the faster percent or more threads, the less drawdown on the minimum fps and why the Riesen for this minimum fps much merge Intel. Just explain exactly as what you said above, this relationship does not have above me said reason.

MagicHero
Citylink and take always. The difference is almost 6K. Well, I said, speaking of the streams and razanah. Yes, his money is better to take Intel, I agree. Well, who takes Reisen with the box?))) perhaps only in finished assemblies, if someone else buys so))) of course the tower is taken separately, what I mean)

MagicHero
Spoiler
Spoiler
Even in krayzis 3 with iron 70 personnel in motion, showed the failures of at 0.1 and 1%, when in fact they didn't even osutils, IF not included, would not know.
As they were testing - to see in one place stood out and values. FPS is really high but the failure is traced to 30 frames difference (90 > 60, 100 > 70), what can be seen.
Ran on the station, progruzil area, repeated results, got the numbers at 0.1 and 1%. Hmm, what hardware you need to have both good performance and good price to get such a beautiful figure. Although, if Reisen would be issued at the level of those 110 frames would get 70 frames on these %.
To write more and I will not argue, comes 2700, compare the values (worse than it is now, they can not be). Can really trash the Opera with 4790k, although I was going through the timings / subtyping, the average FPS increased.
PS Benchmark Origin I did with the second, third times, because the failure was much less rendered frames more and the average FPS yielded the value 1-zu, but more. So, the HDD has an impact on the 1 and 0.1% because of its low speed read / write, and in General, loading areas and location of the game (in fact the video card works with textures, the CPU throws IT), this is especially true for open-world. Understand what you want (although it should not do it, already see warped). Later, do not forget to throw off the results with 2700. Game skins on the SSD.
MagicHero wrote:
I wrote there that the faster percents, the less drawdown on the minimum fps
Yeah, the 4790k the same very fast and however it happens. (on the flow 8700k scored 2700 points, and 4790k 2530). The point to this when there is an Opera and read the HDD.
Sort it out in his fast processor is better. Gaps in the theory. I have to put more powerful percents to get higher values?
MagicHero wrote:
type faster than percent the faster the screw
I certainly did not. As You read my posts at all? Now and it warped severely.
0.1% is RANDOM, requiring revision. On Your screenshot the numbers, the feeling, taken from the ceiling, there are many questions on them (1700H cannot be better than 2700. 2700Х not much different from the 2700.
Run yourself a bench and then repeat and compare the values (preferably three times). The difference is, definitely.

Zevs72ru
Why buy CITILINK, when there is computerusers?
For the price of the OEM version of the citylink, you can buy a BOX 2700Х.
Spoiler
Of course, there best to take more for shipping, no doubt. Of course, for overclocking 2700 need something better than a boxed cooler (by the way, and animal good for something weaker, if to resell).

VOVAN WOLF
What SSD, what RAND I'm above the picture showed and so all of absorcion who test the games with the readings of 1% and 0.1% and all razanah dips more and the sooner percent of those failures LESS. DO YOU EVEN READ WHAT I WRITE???
Here is an example
Spoiler
And here without overclocking
Spoiler
And strangely enough, the ratio remains the same but the drawdown without acceleration became worse.
And there is only one and the same configuration with differences only in the processors on one system and the motherboard with CPU on different.
And here I explain why with the SAME SSD AND RAM different results and why than percent FASTER, or if it is dispersed the better the result???
And more it is not necessary to pour water, just specifically tell me about this and that as I wrote above according to your conclusions percent faster than the faster running SSD and Eisenach SSD performs best, or is necessary to disperse percents as the machine accelerates SSD ))) after all, you yourself write that the reason of failures due to the SSD

MagicHero
MagicHero wrote:
unless of course RAM is enough because if the game starts instead of the Opera to use the screw or slesnick then there is will freezes in any case
Show me a game that does not use hard.I have 16GB of RAM, I don't see more games of 8-used.But hard to eat on a 10-15GB:

[Denis]
OMG I already wrote above, not good NOT CLEVER will come all the way around, eats and uses are two different things. For example, a long time ago... when I had antediluvian and the Opera was not enough that some games (like GTA 3) used hard disk for lack of RAM. I even for this case allocated a separate part of the disk. And brakes when you use the screw started good and this is compared with a speed not even DDR and SDRAM.
You for fun limit the number of Opera and see how the game will behave when you start to use a screw or SSD instead of the Opera.

MagicHero
Well, I'm trying to understand.I have all the screws on 7200 rpm. you said Vova flaw should be instead of a smooth picture as he and 28Гб of the screw used.The more RAM used, the more used and the propeller.

abbadon_na wrote:
When playing processor-i5-6600k and the GTX 1080 are always 100% CPU usage. The same situation was still only with the Origins. Accordingly, the video card is only working at 60-70 percent even on the morning settings. To make work the video card only helps increase scaling resolutions up to 180%.
you just don't have percent, it has only 4 cores and no HT support, what about the 180% scaling you can talk on 1080, if I 1080ти the scale is 140% barely gives 60 frames on ultra in 1080p, and in some places up to 53-55 drawdown is

MagicHero wrote:
so all of absorcion who test the games with the readings of 1% and 0.1% and all razanah dips more and the sooner percent of those failures LESS.
first, amuda Galimov crutch in the form of infiniti factories, second, the percent of amuda slower with a response of instructions to work than Intel, and as for Odysseus, he uses them very

Steve Taller
I never wrote that I always have a frame rate of 60, I have to put scaling to 180, so the video card was downloaded at least 90 percent. There is no difference in fps between the minimum and maximum graphics settings, but in the second case, at least the picture is better

abbadon_na
The scale is 180 you will be around 35-40 shots, it's unplayable. I have the scale 140 fps is around 65 with jumps up to 75, but rarely, and subsidence of up to 55, in some places up to 49 and the focus is not in percent, and in the map that was always 60+fps, then scale to 100 have to put. So this is my 1080ти and she is struggling to cope, and 1080 at a scale of 100 is not always 60 frames will be given on full ultra. And I percent to 16 threads sometimes 65-70% loaded

Steve Taller wrote:
and 1080 at 100 is not always 60 frames will give
Lok 70 frames, modifier permission 140%, 4790k and a stock graphics card.
Spoiler
As always burns inventor is not childish. And still talking about very low rates in the 0.1 and 1% of the minimum FPS.
Steve Taller wrote:
not always will give 60 frames on full ultra.
Ultra, these are the ones that when high-resolution modifier, 1920x1080 resolution is the ultra anti-aliasing, which is not necessary (at all)? Yes, the brain on the shelf and gathering dust.
A lot of empty load on the graphics card. Pathetic, sorry 1080Ti, maybe better, but with the owner with no luck.