What do you like Sacred or Diablo
interested in Your opinion, write reasonably.By far Diablo 2 is better. This game was a real rarity. But sacred is a very boring game in a good wrapper (chart). There is only one incentive to play it - exploring the huge map.
Well, gentlemen tired of reading your reasoning, the principle of all You have one. One and the other watered by shit is not ethical. But some of You rightly said that these are two different games and equate them to nothing. You may compare them both with Dungeon Siege2. Generally there wash forum sacred and not other RPG. Therefore, topics should go in the Sacred rather than other RPGs. And by and large all not without sin in Diablo glitches, too enough and don't need to shout that it's about patchen and it was all smooth and fine. Not fucking with two lost cat and work :)) And then wonder otkeda we have a cheater Persians appear. In Sacred Also there are a lot of nuances, but if and what to say about him, he strives for the best. I tested with a few of you may first patches of Sacred. I will say one thing half of the glitches are gone.
No excuse me strange - why ascaron has released a brand raw game. Personally, I probably shortened your life by 3 through the destruction of nerve cells since bought sacred at the time when he only just appeared on the shelves and there was a version 1.5. But in diablo 2 I do not recall. All worked on hurrah, without serious glitches.
I am honored here, though not all too much has been written.
Some rotten conversation goes try to compare Ди2 and SU well this is ridiculous, especially when people write about the lack of battle tactics in Di in comparison with secricom, it is necessary to start in Di was at least to play it just the same if not download those ripe it is normal and can last but on the night stall ( Hella won't see with curved selami polyube ), in contrast to sacred where you can download practically from the bulldozer. About underground levels, in the amount of 20 pieces people obviously stopped their development at the first part of di, because if played Ди2 LOD would know that not pozeminiame some nice Di. In General it is foolish to compare sbalansirovannye thing in the world of RPGs with its buggy clone.
Although that certainly pleases the Sakrid evolving and may eventually when the developers get rid of bugs and balance they will bring to mind, then it will be possible to compare and while the answer odnaznachno Di steers in all respects.
Another normal person. And not screaming children, who do like the bright and rich color.
Blizzard for a long time their games prepare this brand to all of their projects are but the output of the product without glitches and interesting for a long time...they still have the money to Dee and the man earn while games already in the afternoon...
Know anything about ди3? That will develop favorite blizza has long been released after wow?
Well Ди3 unlikely firstly because the team that worked on Di left bliza and right now, their projects involved, and secondly corny because the plot lead nowhere, even the balls to pull something it will be difficult.
No, Drably, in any way, steeper. Start with the fact that 60% of the Sacred is a Diablo, or rather the Saam the concept of Diablo. And atmospheric of Table is something you feel not just slicing and dicing, and mashing with enthusiasm(especially meat was killing cows with halberds). Sacred uniform. Hard to say, in Diablo there is some kind of spirit, the Sacred well more like ersatz Diablo. The story in Sacred is zero, though, and in Diablo he was not much freshness, but it was felt, relished, and in the Sacred story a journey from one yellow book(notes) to another.
Diablo 2 - the best RPG of all times and peoples.- Other Diablo is not an RPG, is it an action-RPG or a hack'n'slash RPG. A real RPG is Baldur's Gate.
Well, at 60 or 80% is D. the question is not relevant, because with this approach we can say that all action is the first doom in different variations for example....just in the di all at once, and the balance and the interest and support of the developer...to continue for a long time. And the games that come out after any hit anyway what it take...because to refuse from something that is already tested and the audience likes at least silly.
Don't know what of them better, but tired of its monotony both.CIVILIZATION 4 is a GAME especially multiplayer.
2 Dark Priest:
it's an action RPG or a hack'n'slash RPG
Standard error. :-) You put an equal sign between completely different genres. Action/RPG is a Diablo/D2, S:U, DS2. Hack'n'Slash is TES2:DF, IWD/IWD2, TToEE.
2 Puritanin:
First, the fourth he is a very so-so toy. A typical modern sequel, sinning by samopovtorov, simplicity and other characteristics of the project, sdelannoe with one purpose - to cut as much money on a known name.
Secondly, what does strategy have to do with the topic, which compares two Action/RPG-shki? ;-) You would have Q4 then began to extol (ustome the same as Civ4, by the way).
Yes all the crap is Visible in the world of game developers is happening now is the same as on the stage Full of Degen-atavism And one and the second write crap and cut grandmother FIAR Q4 CV4 COD2 -hits of the season heh heh heh my God what a mess
Constipated Heroes 5 Morovind 4 and Gothic 3 -all eggs will tear bitches
Yes Age off Impart 3 -too Malikov in tights Girl odeyala
2 Valor:
FEAR does not touch. ;-)
Normal tactical simulator with more than decent AI. The weapons are cool, graphics are good.
What's he ever done to you? :-) The plot is bad? Yes, and figs with him, you would think for the first time. No story shooter alive, even today... ;-)
But AoE3 - specific, a drain (I downloaded and can confirm it's impossible to play). Even Civ4 in comparison with it - simply a masterpiece.
Q4 and CoD2 - unremarkable passing shooters.
PS And maybe enough offtopic? :-) To discuss the best/worst games of this year there are topics on the Main forum.
Fira few enemies and rarely get Monotonous and dekoracii Rastrelli spirits in the last mission it's all a banter Flies at you a lot of kakaikh 2-dimensional characters shot and he's like in-game battle is lost Crap There are certainly a couple of those type ninja -not bad but how many of them per game -6-8 Shorter than the hyped dregs Starinski call of duty more adrenaline I Firovskiy graphics if after passing a second time to go laziness does not capture
About Oftop -here and times 3 days in lyuchshe case, who NID of atzavara the type of faggot Tchaikovsky so nimnoshka flood can
2 Valor:
few enemies and rarely get caught
Controversial statement. ;-) Meat shooters have enough. PK:BooH, SS2. Why another one? ;-)
Monotonous dekoracii
Any finite game a set of textures. Moreover, in FEAR they are mostly pretty low resolution, which of course improves their perception. But still - you can't tell me that the fifth interval is similar to the eighth? :-)
Rastrelli spirits in the last mission it's all a banter
I agree with that. :-( Seem to finish them in haste, and to postpone the game could not (can not FEAR to go after the Condemned - there is a purely economic reasons).
---
General conclusion:
The game is shackled by its own engine. As Doom III and Q4 - it has become the duty action-shooter. And could not be - open space with full dynamic lighting no PC will not pull. But still FEAR a head taller than Q4 for all parameters.