The ideological Department of paganotti
Tamez such.As you know, the population likes to ascribe various doctrines and what these doctrines imply. As a rule, negative. This is done, of course, not just so, and under the influence of propaganda. All. Commies, liberastov, Nazis and other scum. As a result, the cattle running in terror just from the name of the doctrine. An anarchist? Oh, my God! You rock the car and want to have things in Afghanistan!, "The Communists! They want to subordinate the production of the plan are to make!. Paganotti there are plenty of narrow-minded, viceroyship such things. The purpose of the activities of this Department, of course, in educating the public. Stop the ignorance at the root. The next - the topic comes the Professor and puts that has one or the other doctrine. Especially we should dwell on stereotypes. Just links to Wikipedia - not allowed. Of course, we can't afford a long discussion the next lecture right here in the topic. Just a quick questions. And brief answers. And a little bit. If you really want and it was all very controversial - create a separate topic.
_ _ _
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Черная_легенда
Here is something similar. In relation to the phenomena of reality.
since the theme of ideology was closed, I think the most appropriate to report on this issue here in the appropriate section of the forums(C)
I've been wondering, is there anyone who read pseudo biograficheskii story Gregory Klimov"the Prince of this world? His attitude and reasoning about everything or almost everything that happens in the world. In the story there are clear language and criteria of communism, democracy and other, that is to say, doctrines. So what is the actual topic, believe it or not? It is clear that I have an opinion, but interested to know what others think.!
Well, to be honest, the intelligentsia has always been putrid..I still remember Chernyshevsky wrote as aristocrats issued decrees to walk naked on the beach.(see what to do)
although to be honest judging by the interview with him..he had gone mad...
The intelligentsia and the nobility of a few different things-and in those days intellectuals were peasants or what?)
All sorts of interest groups, where the intelligentsia held natural Orgy with sacrifices, were only a cover for their depraved personalities.
But summary is that among fans of Stalin, I still adequate debaters are not met. No. Although hope is not lost. Maybe I just had bad luck
Subscribe. All it is.
Well put stolaruk :)))))
Among fans until an adequate Rezun I would not have met. No. Although hope is not lost. Maybe I just had bad luck.
What do you know about these people? All of these great people changed the history of Russia. The same Stalin was a great man. Thanks to him we can now live in a country what it is(well, was before the collapse)
Anarcho-communism (also called libertary communism) (from the Greek. ±¾±BS± — anarchy; lat. commknis General) is one of the areas of anarchism, which aims to establish anarchy (that is, powerless society, which has no hierarchy and coercion), based on mutual aid and solidarity of all people. The main theorist, gave the idea of anarcho-communism slender, finished form is Peter Alexeyevich Kropotkin (1842-1921), which in this case was not the first anarchist-Communist.
Anarcho-communism is a socio-economic trend in anarchist thought, calling for the creation of a society existing on the basis of universal self-government, to build from the bottom up, which will be no private property, instead of which you will have free use of all products of labor of all members of society. Commodity production must be replaced by "guidance for all", that is, in the words of P. A. Kropotkin:
"In a word, let everyone take as many of all that is plentiful and has a limited amount of all that you have to consider and to share!"
The basics of anarcho-communism
Decentralization
Freedom
Equality
Mutual aid
Decentralization — that is, the replacement of centralized state control and a free Federation of self-governing territorial communes (communities) and industrial unions.
Freedom refers, first and foremost, freedom for the full and complete development of the individual without external constraints represented by the state government as well as financial. Accordingly we are talking about freedom from political and economic pressure, when rulers compel a person to act one way or another, with an eye on state laws, and the commodity-money relations are forced to sell their labor power to the owners of private property and means of production. All people should have equal opportunity to freely and in mutual understanding with other people to determine the conditions of their own lives.
Equality means no hierarchy, equal opportunity for everyone to meet individual needs, and equal access to all public goods.
Mutual aid — it is about how to replace the selfishness that divides people, solidarity, designed to restore public harmony, when people help each other and care for others based on the principle "help you, help you."
First, copy-paste for you..!
Decentralization
The story goes that centralisation ancient peoples was for their own good: the first dominion of the great civilizations (Sumer, Egypt) came from the need to organize complex irrigation system, without which the economy couldn't handed, to consolidate forces to counter the raids from the outside. Another thing is that the word power has historically turned into a negative, because people who came to her. That is another argument for the negation of instinct of mutual aid Kropotkin and anarchism in General.
Freedom
Commodity-money relations are forced to work at all. Without them the poor would be the ones who can find food for themselves. What kind of development then to speak?
Equality
This phase of civilization lived. It is about a primitive society.
Mutual aid
For realizowania this item, you need either the strongest centralized power, or relevant developments in genetic engineering.
In General, I was once again convinced that anarchism (let it be communism) utopia fit a maximum of for works of Tolkien. Even in his theory.
Your Majesty
The idea is not bad, but need a complete change of consciousness and understanding of reality by most people...
But for me capitalism is anyway a dead end road.
we need a complete change of consciousness and understanding of reality by most people...
Actually, this is what I wrote.
But for me capitalism is anyway a dead end road.
I'm not asking for justification. You have to say thank you.
The world is ruled by love, money, and oil
http://www.marksizm.info/images/stories/406295.jpg
And the site is located where it is prohibited. And since when do we have it in the free market appeared not tell me?
Fobos Tornado, you've got a profile that you live in Lyubertsy. And Lyubertsy is the territory of the Russian Federation, that is a ban in your city too. Although not all even understand what Mein Kampf...