The ideological Department of paganotti

Gauguin
You know, sometimes your reasoning is so non-standard, are such an unusual idea that, in principle, impossible to take it as is - needs justification, otherwise it often looks like stuff and nonsense =] Take, for example, your bold and brazen statement that"the matter does not exist. It's lol because you and I, everyone else here poking at the keyboard keys, use your peck and mobile phone and so on. All this is matter, physical objects that you can touch and explore, to break and to create. In other words, this conclusion is 100% obvious and therefore needs no proof. The object in your hand proves you matter, lol 8) But the assertion that matter is not, requires a very steep evidence. Audible did, why you on the forum a negative attitude. It is because of the delusional statements that would have been much less delusional, if you could justify clearly.
And we have the same thing here:

Gauguin wrote:
I see these only good.
Done, of course, see that good, but what about the bad? Sorry, what do you see *only* good where there is bad enough ;] I Wonder how such selectivity in the evaluation of ideologies?... Or should I say bias...
Gauguin wrote:
that never had and never will benefit. Moreover, open secret - and now they do not. Anywhere.
The elections themselves are, they can even go and vote )) I'm Sure many people are doing it right now: in a particular state. And I did, really, we have a President in the country the people choose, but there's a difference: the election may differ significantly from state to state (you know this too, isn't it?).
Why there is no choice, if they really are? Justify.
Gauguin wrote:
the right to stupidity that liberalism is a sacred cow should be limited to basic censorship.
Give an example of how it would look, and relative to what? What umeno stupidity? And if some country has already been entered censorship on the stupidity of the tell.
Gauguin wrote:
Rather, recognizing the reality of racial differences without any emotional coloring.
Of course, but the hatred many have, and very bad business when this racist come to power. In addition, fascism exalts one race or nation over others, that is demeaning to all except the title. Thus, at the level of the law introduced an automatic personality assessment through the prism of its origin that is no better than the personality assessment other biased criteria. For example, based on a lot of money, ties, clothing, watches on the hand, car or by birth (noble or commoner). The problem of fascism and Nazism.
Gauguin wrote:
Rather, the exaltation of noble, intelligent, spiritual, and cultural people over stupid cattle.
So the money doesn't matter? Just from the news of your: a couple of rich dudes threw a party for thousands of dollars, and now (for a different reason: personal violence) they call the police)
See how hard it is for you to understand? You point out that fascism and other stuff is full of positives, but to paint details it is necessary already to ask. In fact, you're acting like a Troll: catapulted think and was like, you think out for you. And it think 8) Not in favor of your reputation, lol.

A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Take, for example, your bold and brazen statement that"the matter does not exist. It's lol because you and I, everyone else here poking at the keyboard keys, use your peck and mobile phone and so on. This is all a matter
Anyone who is even slightly acquainted with the philosophy (and starting from the Greek) knows that the sensible and the essence of things - not the same thing. Identification this is either ignorance or demagoguery. It does not matter, this is filler of consciousness, the content of the senses which has a spiritual origin. Simply put, all the material things exist in the mind of God and completely dependent on him, and is not derived from a mythical strange substance called matter which can never be perceived in the experience and completely independent of somebody's perception. If it is absolutely simple and even rude, the whole world - God head. This position of objective idealism is more probable than materialism.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Done, of course, see that good, but what about the bad?
I've ruled out bad if you hadn't noticed.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
The elections themselves are, they can even go and vote ))
Of course. Only here the President is elected not by the people, and bourgeois elite. From a limited number of the easy people for a long four-year term, with a bias, fraud, and is in favor of the need without the ability (of the people of course) to throw him from office at will, at least legally.
Not that I protested against the lack of voting rights, rather I am dissatisfied with the current degenerate elite. Honest elitism with a noble tip without clown parody of people power would have been much more healthy.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Give an example of how it would look, and relative to what? What kind of stupidity?
Relative to the blatant propaganda of immorality and immaturity for example, relatively degenerative vanguard, too. The good criterion of the noble religious country for that.

A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Of course, but the hatred many have, and very bad business when this racist come to power. In addition, fascism exalts one race or nation over others, that is demeaning to all except the title.
The perfect policy, but it is still better than letting the left tolerant degenerates to hijack political discourse and establish a dictatorship of marginalized minorities. It will destroy civilization much faster than the head of state ..ahem...prejudice. After all, at least conservative person would look at things in a much more sober look.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
So the money doesn't matter?
They are not the determining factor, so to speak. The elite of former times wealth was only a Supplement, in modern times, money is a determining factor (including inheritance). This explains the fact that today the rich boy from the top can be the same animals as the village bully, if not worse. That would never have been in the past century, with rare exceptions.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
And it think 8) Not in favor of your reputation
I can't be responsible for someone else's stupidity. Yes, and objectivity is more important to me than ambition, if I wanted fame, it would say here on nowake and pragress, seasoning is a term that students draw from novakopa.


PS By The Way:
Warning
Left-liberal comments on a gaming website.
And Modera a great sense of humor.

Gauguin wrote:
Anyone who is even slightly acquainted with the philosophy (and starting from the Greek) knows that the sensible and the essence of things - not the same thing. Identification this is either ignorance or demagoguery. It does not matter, this is filler of consciousness, the content of the senses which has a spiritual origin.
First, it is difficult in principle to understand, sounds like a set of words, that is nonsense, and if this does not clarify a simple man who is far from any philosophical doctrines, what's the point? This is bullshit, in fact, for the objects are defined in a commonplace way that I have indicated - it's definitely all clear. Hold the phone, here's a material object. And you call the same thing something else - why? Sense to define the subject in hand as a filler of consciousness? Subject your name has not changed ) It is outside of our consciousness and does not depend on it. And so - with any matter. I don't see here, nothing to argue about, or rather what and why *you* are arguing. Called material of all beings, of all sorts of particles and so on, and.. what's the problem then? )
Gauguin wrote:
Simply put, all the material things exist in the mind of God
Easier that doesn't make it any fraction.
Gauguin wrote:
matter which can never be perceived in the experience and completely independent of somebody's perception
That is, perception of the subject items do not exist? )) The camcorder has long denied this nonsense. Animals also exist without our perception. I propose an experiment: go to a mine filled with natural gas without odor and color (so you couldn't perceive), and light a match -)
Gauguin wrote:
If it is absolutely simple and even rude, the whole world - God head. This position of objective idealism is more probable than materialism.
First, there is no way to prove to *all* of God, and therefore this position is initially unacceptable. Secondly, it is the same theory like the theory of big Bang, strings and dark matter ) at the Ultimate truth we may never know, but because it makes no sense to speak of probability since your opponent you can just as easily say that matter is also likely, as God, and evolution of man as his creation ;]
Denying one, put yourself in a certain frame, limiting yourself...
Gauguin wrote:
I've ruled out bad if you hadn't noticed.
Fascism without all aspects of this definition - is not fascism, but something else. Do not puff brains ;]
Gauguin wrote:
dissatisfied with the current degenerate elite
Here I agree.
Gauguin wrote:
I can't be responsible for someone else's stupidity.
It's not stupidity, it is the inability to convey the idea so that was understandable. In addition, call it stupidity - the same kind of speculation -)
Gauguin wrote:
Yes, and objectivity is more important to me than ambition
It is not obvious that you have a lot of objectivity. You have an obvious bias in the opposite direction science mixed with philosophy that the common man is not clear, say so, full. For the position of a Neutral, objective, God is a possibility and not the truth, but because it is impossible to build an objective picture of the world, where either definitely has It or definitely not It (we don't know - that's objectivity, because if you'd know I'd believe in God, but exactly.. sorry, I would know)... If this is about your personal view of the world, is quite another matter. Just not Lala about probability, this is the way to demagoguery -)