\"Monopoly\" and hedgehogs with them...

ihappy
ihappy wrote:
There is a theory that intuition is the answer to the part of the brain that is unconscious or subconscious(sort of the same thing).
And then you give such a definition of unconscious...

It is easy to give people the Feces, but to take away almost somoene

A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Oh Yes, the beginning of philosophy &)
It is not a philosophy, it's a fact.
Estimate of the situation, sight deceives you, and hearing.
You know that every person sees hallucinations, but in an emphasis does not notice. This also applies to the auditory hallucinations. Although they are easier to notice(hear) than visual. Since most visual hallucinations we just help to see better. Our brain simply draws the picture. And does it constantly.
As well, we have this psychology that we all, without exception, in the first place looking for confirmation of his words.
If a person believes in God, he most likely would believe in the appearance of an angel in the sky. Because it confirms that God exists. Although it does not prove that God exists. But the man himself be fooled and not notice it. Also atheists.
The deception is normal for a person. Including self-deception.
And believe me, if there would be a deception, then most likely we didn't. This very much influenced our evolution(although there were in the process of evolution).

A. Soldier of Light wrote:
And do you have this ) That's really one you shouldn't deceive is yourself )
So, why I feel and not trust. So how is it that neither is cheating.
But yeah, this confirmed everything.
But this does not mean that we should silently accept. When silently accept this(not particularly consciously), you start in God(in particular) to believe ;)


A. Soldier of Light wrote:
It is not necessary to believe it is, and that's a fact ) Just not all the same, not everyone listens...
By faith, I mean faith in the type of God. That's like a figure of speech meaning that I think that most likely it here and there.

ihappy wrote:
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Only that's not deceive ourselves

OOO you are mistaken.
We live in self-deception.
Especially when it comes to this as feeling inside )
But, I believe in intuition. Since intuition is a trainable skill. There is a theory that intuition is the answer to the part of the brain that is unconscious or subconscious(sort of the same thing).

A. Soldier of Light wrote:
And these feelings people Express, right or wrong.

This does not mean that the people are right.
Since logic dictates that the loser would be orders of magnitude more than those who won. Therefore, negative feedback will be orders of magnitude more.
Playing millions win, for example: Circulation: 1221 from March 4 - 653268 a $ 4 621 507руб.
How cruel you are.)

summer wedding walked, the entrance was on the lottery tickets.
first time tickets were taken, left hand for fun and he was winning, 5000 R. :)
what kind of lottery do not remember that sort of housing.

ihappy wrote:
It is not a philosophy, it's a fact.
Controversial, as a fact obvious to all, and if not, then there will be people who will argue... ^_^
In principle, this also applies to matters of faith and not only. For example, when a person is in a coma, and then says that he saw something, and scientists explain it, but how to prove it? No way. Explain how you want with clever catchphrases, to sense that ) you can't prove there is no soul and so on. That's why I say... philosophy. The term fact I have strictly -)
ihappy wrote:
You know that every person sees hallucinations, but in an emphasis does not notice.
Can see, and can see reality. This is all possible and I have not denied.
ihappy wrote:
As well, we have this psychology that we all, without exception, in the first place looking for confirmation of his words.
If a person believes in God, he most likely would believe in the appearance of an angel in the sky.
Again - wrong understanding of the essence of faith, and I have tried in the past explain this to you. Based on the quotes, first person - a believer - invents the subject of faith, and then looking for signs, right? 8) Smacks of insult to millions of people in the world, but Oh well, who am I to judge you )
ihappy wrote:
Also atheists.
An atheist to be easy.
ihappy wrote:
So, why I feel and not trust.
Because you're an atheist ^_^

A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Can see, and can see reality. This is all possible and I have not denied.
To see the reality generally is not possible.
The human eye sees a very small spectrum of the radiation.
we cannot see radio waves, we do not see microwaves, we don't see x-rays, we actually see a very small part.
But that does not matter. Our eye sees not in mode online. We always get a belated picture of the world. At the same time in 400мс we see nothing at all.

Hearing the same thing. We hear very little.
And the taste? Oh we are poor in this regard. Kakieto birds can feel much more than we do. Or odors. We again feel a small fraction of the actual smells.

Alas, we do not see reality. We see the projection of this reality in our consciousness.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Again - wrong understanding of the essence of faith
And I'm not talking about the essence of faith is here said.
Again, learn the essence of the conversation to see. You're always about the third start the discussion. I'm not talking about faith and not about the essence of faith.
I'm talking about what people are looking for confirmation of his words, and not strangers. It is a fact, ask any psychologist. If you think I'm wrong.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
An atheist to be easy.
Yes, right now.
To be an atheist, one must know.
To be a believer, you just have to believe blindly.
The difference in belief and atheism is that Atheists rely on the knowledge, and the believers on faith.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Because you're an atheist ^_^
no. An atheist is the result of knowledge. And not Vice versa.

A. Soldier of Light wrote:
You can't prove there is no soul, etc
To refute something(and here is the point)
Need someone to prove it.
Who proved that soul exists? The Bible? No! Who?
From a believer I constantly hear, prove there is no God, prove there's no Ghost and TP.
you guys don't understand. The burden of proof lies on whoever makes an assertion.
You say the soul is? approx. Prove it! There is no evidence? So your words are a lie.

ihappy
ihappy wrote:
To be an atheist, one must know.
Not quite. Atheism occurs rather from ignorance than from knowledge.
If we talk about religious faith, it is not exactly the faith that you have in mind in everyday situation (I trust him, etc.) is knowledge. The knowledge have other epistemological roots than scientific. Scientific knowledge is external, empirical roots. Knowledge of the religious - rationalistic, a priori, internal. But like any knowledge, it is extracted with difficulty.

PS by the Way, one of the few cases where I prefer the English language Russian - this is a case of faith because in the English language religious faith is indicated by special word Faith that helps to avoid linguistic confusion.
ihappy wrote:
The human eye sees a very small spectrum of the radiation.
we cannot see radio waves, we do not see microwaves, we don't see x-rays, we actually see a very small part.
But that does not matter. Our eye sees not in mode online. We always get a belated picture of the world. At the same time in 400мс we see nothing at all.

Hearing the same thing. We hear very little.
And the taste? Oh we are poor in this regard. Kakieto birds can feel much more than we do. Or odors. We again feel a small fraction of the actual smells.
Thank you, captain, but we know that, at least, since the shadows on the wall of Plato's cave. Reality has a perfect nature, and the senses give us only the images.
A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
You can't prove there is no soul
It is impossible because the existence of the soul is self-evident. This is the primal reality is available to us, the famous Cartesian cogito ergo sum. Even the outside world is more in need of evidence than soul (to you re not a false suspicion on my account, I'll note that the existence of the first, I do not deny). In fact, the line Descartes-Berkeley-Hume a stone was left from materialism, affirming consciousness as a starting point for learning something, as Western rationalists at all. But thanks to the demagoguery and assalto French, and later German and a little Russian materialists, in the cache memory (that neprosvyaschennyh people is called common sense) mass returned truths of materialism.

P. S. Turning the subject of the soul, it is a prerequisite, not a logical step. The proof is based on obvious assumptions, without which it is impossible. If you deny the obvious premise, it collapses the very idea of proof and knowledge, and there comes the destructive skepticism, like what were the sophists in Greece.

ihappy wrote:
To see the reality generally is not possible.
The human eye sees a very small spectrum of the radiation.
A small range is also a part of reality, not Julia )
ihappy wrote:
I'm talking about what people are looking for confirmation of his words, and not strangers.
Well... people are looking for both. Here you said that there warehouse is burning, it's your words, but I don't see, however, I'm curious, I go back and look )
ihappy wrote:
To be an atheist, one must know.
What I know? Know you mean scientists say they are studying. To be an atheist, you just have to believe in God - that is the essence of the term atheist )) Theist - a believer, an atheist is the opposite.
the topic is not about it ))
ihappy wrote:
To be a believer, you just have to believe blindly.
Sometimes, fanatics are )
ihappy wrote:
Atheists rely on the knowledge, and the believers on faith.
Inaccuracy. Knowledge-based everything, even the fanatics of faith read anything, use scientific knowledge in everyday life, in everyday life, in short. Just the term believer or atheist is very narrow, so to speak. They specifically mean, have faith in God or not, more of these terms mean nothing except this time in the human world.
For example, if you told me that there tank fell from the sky (gave an example that is very real: a tank dropped from a plane), I can believe, and believe it or not, and in any case this belief or unbelief does not hinder me to go and see, and it's not about whether I'm a believer in God or an atheist.
ihappy wrote:
The burden of proof lies on whoever makes an assertion.
So. The atheist claims that there is no God - that proves it, lol ^_^
And that? Oh, you just don't believe? Well, then no questions. See how simple? )
The believer believes, and does not approve. The soul, too, believe it or not.
ihappy wrote:
You say the soul is? approx. Prove it! There is no evidence? So your words are a lie.
Not a lie, because the definition of a lie requires the knowledge of the truth. You know that there is no soul? No, I don't know, you just know one thing: you soul not seen, and that's all. Speaking from a Neutral Position, objectively, the soul can exist, but maybe not, it's up to the end is unknown, PT. God is the same. So believe it or not, no claims.
Another thing, when I talk about my worldview: there is a place and God, and soul, and everything scientific, including...

Yesterday I won $ 100.