The choice of processor v.7
In this topic we choose processors.Before ask question, it's highly recommended to read the theme FAQ: Processors
Do not forget about the rules of the forum.
Old topic here
X_ray_83
By the way, Yes, the price of a bomber just over 11K people where to get, in that time, 2700 15K cheaper nowhere to be seen, but there is a summary table of the performance of the Riesen from the first to the third generations?
SUSUL1
Here Ryzen 2700 and 1700
https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3489-amd-ryzen-5-3600-cpu-review-benchmarks-vs-intel
Hello. There is an I5 3450, although on the alik order I7 3770 and K version. How appropriate is a replacement?
I don't want to change the whole platform.
Rico Chico wrote:
How appropriate is a replacement?
If it's performance, it's not appropriate. LGA1155 is physically obsolete.
If you're just a replacement, maybe it makes sense, it'll be better. Tokma to expect from him something will be naive, because of the above.
Rico Chico
What mother? if the acceleration fits then 3770k it makes sense to take and the increase will be due to the acceleration and stability of the frame time due to streams
if the mother is not to disperse then it is easier to take Xeon e3-1270 v2 the same i7 3770 but without construction and frequency is not 3.9 but 3.8, the replacement for this stone, will take the into a weave and reduce the frieze and jump of the framework, but on the phps is not a quick increase
You've got a comp on i7 2600, and 3770 is the same, compare the performance on these computers and decide for yourself whether you need it or not.
but you need eight gigs of opera unequivocally.
SPR1GGAN
ASUS P8Z77-V
Do you want to say it's more powerful than the i5?
I watch it 2600 loses 3450.
Rico Chico wrote:
I watch on tests he 2600 loses 3450
I don't know who's losing to whom, but if it's a weird test.
it's both in frequencies below your i5 and on the cores
The mother is by the way suitable for dispersal, but not strong, drove on it 2600k to 4.8 but the batteries began to warm up after a minute of dough up to 90 degrees, I think 4.5 it should pull, and there if you joke the radiator on the power chain and the ventiolor to sing then you can try and more.
but in general, now 3770k has already fallen to 8k, you can take it and it, consider the top on our socket, and there you already decide on the price of quality, it is worth it or not.
By the way, the mother has a lot of fine settings of the system, already now you can train in the acceleration of your pumti and percent
here's an example of the acceleration of your ing percent along with memory
The processor was able to accelerate to a frequency of 3900 MHz. To do this, the multiplier was raised to 37 (105 x37), the frequency of DDR3 - 2240 MHz (105 x21.33), power voltage - to 1.125 B, power voltage DDR3 - 1.5 B, Turbo Boost - included.
I didn't pay much attention, I always thought that 3450 is more powerful than 2600.
The 3DMark received plus 2,000 parrots in the physical test. In Total War Warhammer 2 is the opposite minus 1.5 frames, but it doesn't care.
That's what happened.
Spoiler
Is there anything that 2600 in the specifications has supported DDR3 frequencies lower than 3450?
Didn't get a little last comment, what's the point? In fact, the greater the frequency, the better, on the contrary purely physically can not be, only if it depends no longer on memory
Percent should be taken with a backlog for years 5-7 forward 10 cores minimum.
It's a question for connoisseurs. Which is better, is there a big difference or not?
Oasis777
Second
Much better to it deshman z370 and less operational at 3600. It's going to be good.
But to be honest, my choice is Ryzen r5 3600 (x)
Oasis777
9700 - 8 cores 8 streams
8700 - 6 Cores HyperTreading 12 streams
The first one is better.
For games better Intel i7-9700
nickSIA
Which games are better? Thank you for the answer. I'm just priced out...
Thanks for the advice with the i7-9700.
It's for games.
Intel Core i9 - 9900 - do not get out of the skin and all the money to lay out for this??
Ryazancev
I did. Atp.
But to be honest, my choice is Ryzen r5 3600 (x) - for games like all Intel advise still ...
Oasis777 wrote:
Which games are better?
The i7-9700K is better for games.
Better yet, the i7-7700K, but it can't be found in stores. )
Lodurr
Thank you for your advice. That's kind of filled three things:-)
Spoiler http://pc4games.com.au/processor-intel-core-i77700k-kaby-lake-4200mhz-lga1151-l3-8192kb-oem?ymclid2675011102755300001/frommarket'https://market.yandex.com.au/product-protsessor-intel-core-i7-7700k/1716356308/offers?track?tabs
And what is it better??