Powerful computer ( 100% CPU Zarazka ) (Call of Duty: Warzone)
Comp I58400, 8GB of RAM, 1060 (6Gb) . Constantly percents are loaded on 100%.In Page at maximum speed is normally played, in any game there is no problem...
And then as soon as fly to the match starts friezes, especially in turns, when damage is received, and when shooting, that is play is generally not possible when freezes no FPS consistently shows about 100.
Threw off the settings on the most possible minimum, the situation is the same...
Who faced and solved a problem - prompt.
Lex-one
I already wrote above that this problem is on many prots, and not only old ones.
ElectroZalupka
How would you soften. 6600 is already 6 years old, and in technology it is considered very old.
It's like comparing iphone 3g and iphone 6, heaven and earth are simple.
The same problem the percent is loaded at 100 percent .. And even in the menu ... Because of this, constant heating goes on ... The percent does not reset frequencies at all ...
In short, I found a solution to the problem on the stream of one multilingual streamer. We go into the folder with the game and right-click on the launch file. We select the properties, then there we find the item optimization of the full-screen mode and run as administrator and put a tick in front of these items. Profit. A constant load of pro gives and the game begins to behave adequately.
Lex-one
What nonsense are you talking about? The game is far from the most Dishchensky processors also loads it by 100%, and sometimes Dishchensky ones are better lucky.
I am suffering with drawdowns up to 40 fps with 1080ti and i5 9600k, and the druzhban with 1050 ti has a normal flight. And my system makes no difference at low settings I run or at high.
Gray_Wolf 95
What do you want from 6 cores?
Nibos is not overclocked yet and the memory is at 2666.
Intel drags only in overclocking both the processor and the memory, that's right in the ass.
And if you put the stock, then suffer.
And drawdowns up to 40, is that 0.1% fps?
Or 40 all the time?
And what to talk about, see how you and your friend are going, maybe there’s a drawdown for you, a comfortable gameplay for him.
Lex-one
Don't be a mega brain. Fps jumps from 120 to 40, a friend does not give less than 60. Prots like i5 6400 and 1050ti with 16gb ram.
Changing the graphics settings does not bring anything, this is not a hardware problem! In the same battle with cooler graphics, the result is much better, and at the ultras!
You are clearly not all right with your head once you think that the i5 9600k is shit for such a game.
ps With your Rx 570, intel 6700, I suppose everything flies at ultras at 4k and 140fps))
Gray_Wolf 95
Are you only capable of being sarcastic?
I tell you show the gameplay from both systems, with statistics, so that you can analyze and see what the problem is.
And then it seems to me you're just lying.
Gray_Wolf 95 wrote: ps With your Rx 570, intel 6700, I suppose everything flies at ultras at 4k and 140fps)) My
wife does not complain.
6600k in rzagone with RX580 pulls with a minimum FPS up to 37/40 frames. Processor load 80-90% for the game will be enough at 60 frames with this video card.
Spoiler
The 3570 processor is paired with the gtx 1060, does not export even 50 frames, the processor is weak.
Spoiler
i5-8400 with gtx 1060 takes out the game successfully with an average FPS of 60-70 frames.
Spoiler
Conclusion: 4-core office, especially not overclocked, it's high time to landfill. The dispute is not about anything.
Gray_Wolf 95 wrote:
Prots like i5 6400 and 1050ti with 16gb ram.
6400 runs on the bus on the Z170 up to 6600k. With such a video card so as not to give out.
Lex-one
Lex-one wrote:
Nibos is not overclocked yet and the memory is at 2666.
Lex-one wrote:
And drawdowns up to 40, is that 0.1% fps?
They don't even know such a concept. For him, this is a fabulous minimum, but for you and me this is the average FPS. They operate here with the average, but not the minimum.
Vovan Wolfovich
So I told them the same thing.
I personally have 200-210 shots without emphasis on the GPU and are loaded by 30-40%
Lex-one
On which system? There are two computers in the profile. And both, with those video cards, should be taken out in an easy game.
Those. I do not understand, you are waging a war in an attempt to prove that 4-nuclear percent copes with this game hard.
P.S. I don’t understand, 9600k should play this game easily. It's not a topic at all.
Vidos
Here you need to understand at what FPS it plays, with what resolution and settings. But he should not notice drops with an average FPS of up to 40, if indeed 0.1 and 1 are not included there.
Wolfovich vovan
vovan Wolfovich wrote:
Ie I do not understand, you are waging a war in an attempt to prove that 4-nuclear percent copes with this game hard.
I'm not waging a war, I just tell them that their processes are already old and can't cope with the game, and not a curve game. They say the developer cheated with minimal requirements.
The guy wants 200 fps for 2500k, when his stone is 60-70.
I'm sitting on the ryzen 3900x, my wife has a second computer.
Lex-one
Lex-one wrote:
that their processes are already old and cannot cope with the game.
He thinks that hitting 9600k. Refinement, 4 cores. Minimum and mean the minimum settings and FPS in 30-k.
Lex-one wrote:
A guy wants 200 fps for 2500k, when his stone is 60-70.
200 frames 9600k is capable of producing at a frequency of 5000. What is 2500 from 2012?
Well, okay.
Vovan Wolfovich
"I personally have 200-210 shots without emphasis on GPU and loaded by 30-40%"
You are clearly not talking about warzone
Lex-one
And, now you also have a system with rtx 2080ti in your profile. You updated quickly)