Impressions from the beta (Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2017))
See here experiences there, although a beta version was available October 4th (for those who did pre-order), and all will be available from 6 October. Completed beta testing on October 9.I tried the game today. Menu globally there are 3 variants of the game:
1. The single-campaign. Here, in beta of course nothing, just start a small movie with a is the single-campaign.
2. Multiplayer. There are three modes of play: galactic assault 40 players (that in the previous version of the game was called attack of the walkers), starfighter assault on the 24 player (that in the previous version of the game called squadron), strike to 16 players (this is infantry mode)
3. Arcade. So named that in the last version of the game called tasks, i.e. singles that match with bots. Here available for just two matches for the dark side on the map Naboo. Yes, Yes, there was the era of the clone wars. You can play for droid (there is a choice of specializations - assault, heavy infantryman, officer, sniper), Darth Maul or the droid B2-RP. The meaning of these assignments just to fill a certain number of kills.
For droids like to play more just for the officer, because he knows how to put turrets. The sniper as it is not taxied in narrow corridors, and the rest too quickly overheats the weapon, with mediocre damage. The droid B2-RP how to play did not understand, he also slowly rechargeable missiles no other much damagesee no weapons (there is a rocket jump and strafe, but he is in the corridors of little use). Blasters are the most common. For Darth Maul the most fun - stuffed frags very quickly (in-game skills he is like Darth Vader, only a long sword and moves faster).
About the performance. On my system (Intel Core i7-980X 3.33 GHz, ASUS Rampage III Gene, ASUS GTX1080 8Gb, 12Gb Kingston DDR3-1333, Windows 10) performance of Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (2017) of course slightly worse than the previous part, but nevertheless you can play all settings ultra with scaling of 150% (in principle, and 200% is also not bad). Zoom you want to include it, because in the game there is still no normal smoothing, there is only FXAA and TAA, which is essentially no aliasing, and blurring. And the zoom setting in fact and realizes the only true true-antialiasing SSAA. On the chart, IMHO, it is about as it was in the previous section, like in the Battlefield 1. Poor can not say anything. The only think that dark gamma, and gamma settings in the game, and the brightness is not corrected. Sound smart, like in the cinema.
In fact, it is not much different from the first part, only a lot of customization options with the cards that fall out of boxes like in mass Effect Andromeda. You can get trading cards by playing, but you can buy. I think grace these boxes, the gameplay in consequence will be tied. Well, until something like this.
actually nothing except the graphics in the game and no,game is not addictive like бф1,well, no in them the identity as in BF3,4,who are happy to play still
Played in the first part of Sonya quite a bit,so can't compare,but overall the game is not bad,the cartoon will chop is possible,though space fighting is made a cool and impressive but managing fighters discourages to play in space,land battle, too epic but still no atmosphere of those old battlefronts,the same situation with the new movies of star wars,in General, the game prohodna,download and go it alone, to remove,to buy only at a discount in the new year,the game for a long time will not last as battle.This is the conclusion.
Well, you could say the beta ended. The final opinion is. Performance the game runs fine and it requirements no more than 1 battlefield. There is a mode direkth 12, I first turned it on then turned it off. No difference, neither in picture nor in performance is not noticed. Apparently it's setting the fashion, if it is not, it is considered not cool. Another of the decorations, are prevented coming from nowhere and flying birds and leaves. And the leaves are flying, like on the street at least a hurricane, while the surrounding trees barely move, and the bushes and plants encircling the walls, perfectly still. Generally occurs graphical dissonance with the surrounding world, which feature the birds and leaves looks unnatural and just annoying. The sound of the game is beyond praise. But the fact that the release will be Russian voice, sad (especially considering that the game is not very little + assumed future permanent dengosos for the boxes). As for the gameplay, all the standard infantry classes, IMHO, the most useless officer. When playing solo, they just have nothing to do (and to command the actions the game does not). Not the gun damages the turret some sort of cotton, and very quickly egged. But the specialist class is very good (and his gun, the sniper rifle is better), but if you have to take the card to increase the multiplicity of optics, you can skirmish with happy new year. The heroes now have other, but if it falls, is shot down very quickly. In fact heroes are now normal units, with unusual weapons and abilities. About space battles. The aircraft in fact was as fragile irons prowling from side to side, and stayed, but due to the fact that their speed was lower, handling is improved and now easier to play. Moreover, with the view from the outside and from the cockpit (in the last part of the aircraft with the cockpit view became completely unmanageable). Overall I still like the game. The only cards... but I'm afraid this is a common trend pay to win, which simply have to accept.
All very nice,the optimization is great,the gameplay is standard(BF 1,BF 4).
Spoiler
Lags terribly I go and always throws me back, the Internet does not pull, and on account of the counts of all the rules of fps 90
gennaz wrote:
the gameplay is standard(BF 1,BF 4).
Not quite. I would say the gameplay presented an battlefield 1 minus all Squidoo-command-the tactical component, which battlefront 2 had left only the specialization (and substantially less distinct than in battlefield 1). In the game there is still no global map, you cannot choose place of re-spawn, even the side for someone to play can not be selected.
Super graphics, but the gameplay is monotonous ) And the alone will be the same rotten, as in the Battle of the 1st?? Who-thread knows?
DayPsycho wrote: And the alone will be the same rotten, as in the Battle of the 1st?? Who-thread knows?
I'm afraid to release it no one will know. Still the only game in which dice has been the single company was battlefield: bad company 2. I don't know dice was doing there single, or are they only for multiplayer answered.
The first was the wildest jauniem. Bought on sale for 200, played 2 hours, it is a pity spent time. The second is almost the same janise, but better. Infantry unrealistically poor, the dice looks like the beginning of the 2000s, not 2017! Miserable microscopic maps, no destructible, 20\20 instead of 40\40, palika laser and began to cut the flesh(in Jedi Academy was cut -_-). But flying in space failed, like in the cinema sitting! Another would be the race from episode 1 added! Ah, Yes. System luchboxes gorgeous! EA seems to have invented a new distribution system Pay and Pay!
By the way, Yes, destructible in the game at all. But probably in this lies the main secret of high-performance games at similar level of graphics. And whether you want the destructible in star wars? If you offer a choice 30фпс and destructible or 150фпс without destructible, I would chose the latter.
For me, the duck Battle 1 is better in terms of graphics. Yes, even Batlfront the first of Dixon and it looks juicier.
Tactical component - low, as in the first Batlfront.
System cards don't like. This means that there will be no, what you will achieve by myself, all exclusively on randomness, even guns. This is stupid, by the way.
I am sure it will be a long time to fix other studios, as now corrected the first Battle. And after a year the game will have good gameplay, but not at the start.