USA undervaluation and overvaluation of Russia
Do not you think that we underestimate the USA and what they should cost more, and we, in turn, should cost less?After all, what have they done for us? All. What are we to them? Nothing.
Like water in the sand, all goes, all their actions and efforts against us. Sack of shit - that's who we are. No response from us.
Only the gods do not require return, and people require. They are tired of being gods, and live not for themselves but for others - for us that is. Already can't become, it requires.
Follower Perelman
Watched some material on the subject of our dispute. In fact understand, you and I both poluprov. What happened is a case of not quite ordinary, but it is not the first and not only from our side. The danger could only measure academic intelligence and high technology and in the long term Yes, depending on many factors. In a further argument is pointless, as did the fact that the shoal is there, despite the fact that in the subsequent harm from approaching events seems so minimal, before that, there's nobody. I was glad to be enlightened (no radiation, thank the gods)) - for podcherpnul a lot of new things you otherwise would not learn.
Nevoeiro
In such cases to raise a stink we must first always and everywhere, as soon as immediately. Not only our being may directly depend on the timely filing of such information. But inflation is not a good action. And all of this, scientists need to speak and not human rights defenders, ideally.
Nevoeiro wrote:
And your perception is.
not quite the same
and I don't smear Russia as you stubbornly want to prove, but only to emphasize the attention on the fact that human life is less valuable than the same West )
you will argue with that ?) or, again, we need facts )?
dog
we are both enlightened in some degree and understood what a dangerous place we live in )
Mayamenstate wrote:
Do not you think that we underestimate the USA and what they should cost more, and we, in turn, should cost less?
Cost more? I mean? 8)
Mayamenstate wrote:
After all, what have they done for us? All. What are we to them? Nothing.
And you who is this? Ukraine or Russia? Because she and this did for US... something. For example, permission to NATO planes to fly through vozdushnoe space of Russia is did nothing? Orly?...
In fact, the author just trolls. A fat stuffing &)
Wing42
Funny 8) This raw materials appendage of the U.S. President chose, and hacker attacks around the world has produced, and its oligarchs a bunch of real estate bought in Europe and not only, and pushed the United States in Syria, and has not given the leader of Turkey to be destroyed in the local version Maidan", and the vetoes in the UN, and ignores the many sanctions the U.S. and Europe, continuing to build the Nord stream 2... But Yes, write more about appendage ^_^
Wing42 wrote:
Just do not close your eyes to what is happening in\with Russia, and you're dirty, you're just a Russophobe, you immediately lick Pindos and so on. Simply look and see. But we are not about politics never.
And here I fully agree.
Follower Perelman wrote:
history tends to repeat
Slogans is certainly fun, that's just the slogan works both ways ;]
Follower Perelman wrote:
In Russia the habit to hide
and nedopustit witecki information that would not fall face in the dirt so to speak
I remember one boat in this year aground, and not to fall face in the dirt, the West began to invent tales )
Now the truth is the court... rather, the Tribunal shameful about Boeing) Who and how obosr/ll an open question, although the answer is already clear 8) Hint: not Russia ^_^
Follower Perelman wrote:
and I don't smear Russia as you stubbornly want to prove, but only to emphasize the attention on the fact that human life is less valuable than the same West )
you will argue with that ?) or, again, we need facts )?
No, in this case, the assertion is not something extraordinary, so special does not require proof ;]
dog wrote:
In the major English-language media about a year ago speech was not conducted.
Last year there was an interesting action series... was called it Skrobala ツ
Mayamenstate
Mayamenstate wrote:
After all, what have they done for us? All.
Too thick.
Mayamenstate wrote:
Like water in the sand, all goes, all their actions and efforts against us.
To pay catsan
VOVAN WOLF
I love listening to USA, and now looked in nycity times a Lethal weapon, well, they have beggars who esle lucky to live trelle 40%.Why don't you see the good in their Homeland? Although secretly I do not see except nature. But this is my home, and as her mother did not choose. I like her though not beautiful.
Warrior Morgoth wrote:
But this is my home, and as her mother did not choose.
and drunk the tears dripped in a bottle hawthorn...
Hello
We only own production is used. And brandy for 25,000 can be travanut and hawthorn.
A. Soldier of Light
Totally agree with you. We will not delve into history, but some of her time the Crimea, Russia conquered Turkey, and then about a hundred years gave to Ukraine. What can you compare it? Alaska, which the United States wrested from Russia about 150 years ago, and has now transferred to Canada. Then Canada decides to join the EAEU, USA it does not suit, and they're pulling Alaska back. But then Russia strawhat and says that it is a violation of the territorial integrity of Canada, her freedom of self-determination and imposes sanctions against the US and against all those who disagree with it.
What's all this bullshit? This is naked aggression. Although, who knows? Maybe they are dorks that like those planes it would calmly looked? But why do we now have to do the same? That is the question.
Mayamenstate wrote:
But then Russia strawhat and says that it is a violation of the territorial integrity of Canada
You have the example of Russia instead of Turkey? Funny, though ) And you are simplified, omitting details. To win, to take, to give, to give... each of these points (historical) requires in fact a separate analysis. For example, how the right, both legally and from a purely human point of view was the right decision to give Alaska to America? I heard that first, cheap sold it. Second, that tsarist Russia did not get anything for it (the money stolen). And again, it was sold for money, but Crimea has not been sold, so the point of your comparison is zero ) It is not.
With regard to aggression and other factors of imaginary wars, some countries, besides Russia, can blame all of this and the United States. That is the logic of the Western world against Russia could be used against them.
Mayamenstate wrote:
But why do we now have to do the same? That is the question.
You who and do what?
A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
You have the example of Russia instead of Turkey? Funny, though ) And you are simplified, omitting details. To win, to take, to give, to give... each of these points (historical) requires in fact a separate analysis -- And again, it was sold for money, but Crimea has not been sold, so the point of your comparison is zero ) It is not.
Like you said, it's just details. And the main thing - in a position of strength. Can any country as much as necessary to put ourselves in the place of the United States, but the United States it is not. Here we are talking only about the principle. That is, if you apply the same principle, omitting the concept of force, it turns out here so.
I believe that our Western partners, implying that it is not Russia that gave Crimea to Ukraine, and that Ukraine took the Russian Crimea in 1954. Well, as with East Germany - not the Soviet Union gave up, and Germany took.
And what about America? I do not understand the principles on which it belongs to the Europeans, together with Australia? On their own. If you need to ask, only them, and the Indians of America and aborigines of Australia do not need to ask. Why is that? Yes, and that means to ask? This is a manifestation of some kind of mentality? The type to say no? And the crying and the tears - it does not mean that there is? Or emotions this rabble they do not touch? Well, it's fascism. Once all were so - so mobile.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
You who and do what?
We - Russia. Why do we have to do the same, as do the US? If we will have to fly the plane, we have not to knock, because the United States did not hit? What do we care how the US is doing over there?
For some to share their wives is acceptable, but for others absolutely not. And what they care about the fact that those are acceptable? Let them stew there in his pot, in its own juice. Any spray from this hole get here.
Mayamenstate wrote:
and what does it mean to ask? This is a manifestation of some kind of mentality? The type to say no?
The position of the force is from the animal world. Yes, effectively, but too simple and primitive. A strong right is a right of the animal, not the person. People beyond the set of instincts, we are given the mind to subdue your passions and desires, to manage emotions, and so on.
That is? If we descend to the trivial – the use of force – we become more animals and less people. And from the point of view of morality even more ^_^ in animals there is no morality.
But this common position. Of course when it is necessary to stop force, it is necessary to use force, the only question is exactly how to use it and then what to do with the culprit...
Mayamenstate wrote:
Why do we have to do the same, as do the US?
Don't know who asked this question originally and where? -)
Hello
Potiri handle liberast, your usa proved that the battle of Prokhorovka nonsense! Just don't eat a lot to celebrate.
dog
Nevoeiro
here again something is amiss in the Danish Kingdom
https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-49028615
Hove caches
Follower Perelman
Pejovnik to take with me?
Well, if interesting is from Ozersk to Barrow 350km.
Follower Perelman wrote:
not quite the same
and I don't smear Russia as you stubbornly want to prove, but only to emphasize the attention on the fact that human life is less valuable than the same West )
you will argue with that ?) or, again, we need facts )?
Oh yeah you have a really bad understanding. I'm not saying that you obserat you on the basis of not lepih arguments say that you can crap.
The question was for what reasons can smear Russia, you these reasons are ridiculous provided. You already own your own words confirmed my conclusion.
Less valuable, it's a rhetorical question, it's life under certain conditions, generally pshyk, and so throughout the world.
Yes, you argue in the first debate had pissed away all their positions.
Well let facts.