Miserable smoothing TAA (Fallout 4)

bloomm
She is optimized for Battlefield 4 in 4K on ultra does not give 60.FPS
As the new 1080 is also no stability.

Bf under amd sharpened.

1080 in stores are not lying about what stability it.

bloomm
In the tests all have been already seen
I know that 4K is the future but give me 100.Fps on ultra atleast in Fallout 4

HACAMOMDELEHET
To be honest, I probably head against the wall would be killed, if I have the card for 50K to 60K is not dragged 4K)

Den4ikRZK
All she carries for someone 40-50 fps in 4K this is not the drags.

bloomm
in the future all monitors will 120-200 Hz
sure..
The meaning of them is lost if not 100+ FPS in 4K
So will...just later

You come in 2K16 Ohm all at 720p sit bazenoch?) At 1080, everything is good, perfect smoothing)

Grand-master
In Bosch the resolution it is practically not noticeable)

Fans mindlessly remove everything on ultra resent. )))
Antialiasing TAA absolutely not and it is differently better than FXAA.
First you need to disable motion blur, well, that would be understandable... or maybe someone is not? )
And secondly for the soap meets two settings in the launcher, this is a detail of lighting, and sunlight. They are the only parameters which give the soap.
Plus the volume of light is better to put SSAO to HBAO gives too much fog, and therefore additional soap. SSAO medium, not much and not enough.
For maximum effect, you need a good monitor profile. If TN, and even budget, the maximum reduction of soap in the picture you will not succeed. In this case I can recommend the mod settings - adjust the lighting and graphics / CLO - Custom Lighting Overlay.
Pretty simple mod, with settings of the picture right in the game. The only thing you need to do is save the game, after the liqueur according to your taste and enjoy sohraneny only with this mod, because if you load a previous save before this mod, you will have to configure the new.

lokkie
lokkie wrote:
soap is responsible for the two parameters in the launcher, this is a detail of lighting, and sunlight. They are the only parameters which give the soap.
They do not give soap, and only PixelNet the edges of the objects on which fall the rays, so it is better to put on ultra.
lokkie wrote:
Plus the volume of light is better to put SSAO to HBAO gives too much fog, and therefore additional soap. SSAO medium, not much and not enough.
HBAO gives the fog ))))) bring more nonsense. These parameters are responsible for shadowing and HBAO in this respect, better SSAO
lokkie wrote:
For maximum effect, you need a good monitor profile. If TN, and even budget, the maximum reduction of soap in the picture you will not succeed.
Need more nonsense, more nonsense ))) already monitors give soap. There is of course a 4K monitor will be better in terms of clarity but if you compare the image in 1080p and a regular full HD monitors that monitor the soap does not affect.

MagicHero wrote:
HBAO gives the fog
Imagine Yes. Just turn the game and see. Oh yeah, I forgot, your samovar ultra's not dragging xD)

lokkie
lokkie wrote:
Imagine Yes. Just turn the game and see. Oh yeah, I forgot, your samovar ultra's not dragging xD)
About what you have there is something pulling has long been understood that so can not continue to fill in about the ultra stable 60.
What about the fact that I did not dragging, too funny, computer course or maybe in fallout 4 on ultra 60 fps no problem.
On the subject HBAO on soap in General is not affected, it's SHADING namely the SHADE but this nublo as you apparently do not understand and continue to be another delusion.
Find the difference in these 2 pictures. Did the truth even in the summer when I was old GTX 780 so the rays here on average, the rest ultra and of course there are no ultra textures for 50 gigs which then has simply not happened.

MagicHero wrote:
About what you have there is something pulling has long been understood
Of course worked out.. shame. Another video posted as proof of your rukovodstva. xD

lokkie
why the theme jumped? but what about HBAO which most of you here insisted that was pressed back to the wall and as small children escaped again )))

MagicHero
Go galoperidola accept and calm down, primatel. )

lokkie
the typical response of a coward ))) I'm not understand you like a sucker? times even in the Internet I'm afraid to admit mistakes or nonsense that you usually write.

pfffffff
soap is soap
it is given a low resolution smoothing anyway (because to deny that anti-aliasing makes the picture better and more unreasonable). bad source of the content is textures and polygons. also anisotropic filtering is about to talk about below, anisotropic filtering x16 disrespectful. and I have such MIP mapping and sampling quality. but it can be attributed to the quality of the textures
the rest of sadiri and Grifoni give useful noble myltse (it does not degrade the original resolution independent of the screen, the detail in the scene) or don't give Soaps at all.

MunchkiN 616
JEM the way much soap sometimes, especially if you apply more smoothing.
It's like some kind of bug.

Bomber
have NVIDIA DSR like in the settings is anti-aliasing. as I understand it renders images in some high resolution and then applies a post process of AZM FHA then ouimet the image to monitornew
the idea is when you vperdolit on full BH smoothing JEM the great + some additional smoothing of the effect niveliruya if it was not
however, I practice these things are not checked
if you put like soap and paivana as a philosophical question. smoothing soap-free and is particularly not possible. for the purpose of smoothing is to suppress pixel sub Pixelate. in fact with osobo cope even ssaa and other forms of supersampling
the only way from izbavitsia is the pump OK and pump monitor to znaczaco pixel it was less than washes to see nanopierce eyes.

MunchkiN 616
it is 17 inches 4K? juicy crumbs pixels