For experienced (trolls, die alone) (Diablo 2)

Sweety_Mustard
Well, you have repeatedly tested the problem of increasing the sample, knowing the maximum damage by 1ppl, which will be exceeded by 8ppl rather quickly. I didn't even need it, I always noticed this difference. Well, "your proofs are not proofs" can be continued right up to parsing the disassembled code, which no one here will do.

Okay, I give up XD classics from PPL grew xn current, and why blizzy not thrust this changed with the damage and Art in patchlogi I xs: the C
FludoTron wrote:
Well, you're not one time the test
is the thing that the sample for There should be a couple of hundred thousand hits like that, in total - plus the damage bonus, as I understand it, does not apply to all attacks.

It's good that many did not see the release of Diablo 3 here, where the developers thought of increasing the damage of mobs in proportion to the number of players: D

Sweety_Mustard wrote:
the fact of the matter is that the sample for such numbers should be a couple of hundred thousand hits, probably, in total - plus the damage bonus, as I understand it, does not apply to all attacks.
conditional fallen beats conditional 100-200 damage at 1 ppl. At 8ppl, it will hit 144-288 damage. What hundreds of thousands of hits are we talking about if the 200 damage threshold is exceeded with a few pokes?
Base damage can be taken from here:
http://www.rubattle.net/diablo2/monsters/fallen/

FludoTron wrote:
What hundreds of thousands of hits are you talking about
just checking the statement is enough, yes - and getting a gradation for different ppl with a step of 1/16 - this is where you need a larger sample.
FludoTron wrote:
many people here have not seen the release of Diablo 3
and why, is it already out? XD Sor, here they just master the classics: C

yes, what hundreds of thousands
for 50 blows you will already know and the minimum and maximum with an accuracy of 5%
is if you do not know what exactly there is a spread,
and if you know that it is 2 times, then the accuracy is even greater, because now we only one number you need

in 50 strokes you will already know the minimum and maximum with an accuracy of 5%
nichrome to yourself, sensitivity! ))

firkax
hike, you did not understand anything. The scatter (xs, what is the step - mb cube with 20 edges) of data from 100 to 288, the required accuracy is 1% ~ (to get the desired coffe of 6.25%). And you mean that a sample of 50 is enough for this?
Damn, I lied again - the spread (initial) is from 10 to 20 with a step of 1, and on top of it there are coefficients from the level of the mob, difficulty, etc. For comparison, a sample for a coin with an accuracy of 70% - 2500 tosses, and there are only 2 values ...

Sweety_Mustard
Why would you get such precision? Initially, you questioned the very fact of the damage buff.

It is enough to compare the damage from a zombie in blood moore on p1 and p7 in the realities of the single and pg ladder

Manifold, this must be done on the sly, otherwise the firk will twist the handle and the zombie will start to criticize and shoot ;-)

FludoTron
Here are the damage coefficients received by a person from diablozone - I was confused by the wording, there are approximate figures hinting at field tests.

Sweety_Mustard
Well, on the other hand, it turned out close to real, albeit with a discrepancy of ~ 1.5%

Obsessed
Obsessed wrote: then the firm will turn the handle
Judging by the firm 's confidence that 50 hits will be enough, he has already turned.

Schefardin or what's a ziller with these traps called static? Does he seem very fast?

passed
Jacob? Who is this?

rambler87
type in youtube Jacob diablo 2

rambler87, Yasha Shniperson, skripach from Odessa

you are all about the same about D2))) hello people)) How are you doing here? How many old people are in the chat)))
Obsessed, T-fox who else from the old people survived on PG?

lordgarry, hello! : D we did not survive, we are "by inertia". ;-) when to play, oh wei? ))
* whispers loudly *: can you drive the firm out ???