Because the PC I got later (2000), before it was consoles. Super Nintendo, Nintendo 64 and PS1.
I have 2003, but I'm not obsessed with 4-5 series of games as you. What have you got there? Foul, Heroes, StarCraft, DS, Heretic? If 2-3 call will be a big success for you.
NVN - no. BG - no. Wizardry - no. M&m - no. Gothic - no. TO - no. Isvind Dale - no. Disicples - no. You and Diablo do not know.
If you're going down for all this (and I to fuck just forgot) you for 5 years coming is enough, and to even think about new games it will not be necessary.
It is not important that all revile the 4th part, as a herd. It is from this not become worse, quite the contrary :D to Dwell only on the 3rd part - that it is bad. Heroes they are Heroes.
If you're going down for all this (and I to fuck just forgot) you for 5 years coming is enough, and to even think about new games it will not be necessary.
I don't know about five, four-then a lot of the time it turns out ) is Not exaggerated if you're a little?
If 2-3 call will be a big success for you.
In your eyes? And I need it? No :] besides, do not forget one thing: not all known old game may be my personal taste. For example, I the length and breadth came when Fallout 2, but Diablo so hooked, even though I had played the version on PC and PS1.
I have 2003, but I'm not obsessed with 4-5 series of games as you.
A matter of taste also.
I don't know about five, four-then a lot of the time it turns out ) is Not exaggerated if you're a little?
I think you're a big boy and don't sit all day behind a computer. I personally with my current way of life would be enough for 10 years. Fortunately, this is my way of life to last, hopefully not so long, and 70 percent of the oldest notable RPGs and TBS I have played and passed. So for me it's 3 years old.
Besides, do not forget one thing: not all known old game may be my personal taste. For example, I the length and breadth came when Fallout 2, but Diablo so hooked, even though I had played the version on PC and PS1.
But not to the same extent that you are not hooked more than 90 percent of the old notable games. Then I'm afraid you're no oldfag, but just a fan of 4-5 well-known series.
New,but there are exceptions:
Gothic 1,2 3,4 better
FlatOut 2 is much better than FlatOut 3
The old LEGO games are better than new
Well, everything.
Gothic 1,2 3,4 better
About a third, and even fourth could be to say nothing, the fourth is all hell knows what, I still have not played, reviews enough.
Old better. But among the new also the excellent come across.
Oh, by the way.
Is better Doom 3 or Doom 2 than Rage.
Doom 3=Rage. And that shit.
Better Heroes of Might & Magic 3 (and 4) than Heroes of Might & Magic 5 or 6.
Fifth heroes a lot better than the fourth.
StarCraft better than StarCraft 2.
Never.
Better The Elder Scrolls 3: Morrowind than The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion.
No.
Doom 3=Rage. And that shit.
You have bad taste and biased opinion on the game, just Doom 3 equated to a dull Stew. It's just funny and fail.
Fifth heroes a lot better than the fourth.
The same canoe with taste. They are better than mystery...
*StarCraft better than StarCraft 2.*
Never.
You also grafodrocher? Or what, in your opinion, in addition to graphics, the second old Man, better than the first?
*Better The Elder Scrolls 3: Morrowind than The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion.*
No.
Well, this is just trolling. Drink yadu )
Tenneesse
:) not surprised you're in the bath for the reason that specified in the profile.
You have bad taste and biased opinion on the game, just Doom 3 equated to a dull Stew. It's just funny and fail.
Rage is boring shit, Doom 3 is boring shit. Where did I go wrong? Gumtree - laced concoctions about anything with complete darkness and pathetic attempts at horror (the incredible pathos of the appearance of each man, which wrings from the same gunfire). You can here something to challenge?
The same canoe with taste. They are better than mystery...
The fact that it is a very decent remake of the third in a new graphic design. Fourth full of idiotic innovations (like a stray mobbo and heroes in battles), which play them normally impossible.
You also grafodrocher? Or what, in your opinion, in addition to graphics, the second old Man, better than the first?
This is me patriot Pisi rubs that graphics doesn't matter?) Hah. I'm quoting your people.
Gameplay better. You can create an army much more, there are some frameworks to 12 warriors, the new physics (also affects the gameplay. colossi, for example, can through the hills to walk), more maps (again - more room to maneuver, etc.) + very cool cutscenes in the campaign, well, you mentioned graphics.
Well duck th worse?
Well, this is just trolling. Drink yadu )
Man, I Troll only Pitch-children. Morrowind seemed very boring, and I played it at the time.
Gentelman
You're sick. Free.
Personal opinion about the game can't be challenged, only to point out his inadequacy, inferiority, lack of objectivity and just sick of the taste, but many like-minded people stupidly made to confirm the correctness of the output :-)
This means, in principle, that each as he would remain unconvinced (sorry). Such cases.
Rage is boring shit, Doom 3 is boring shit. Where did I go wrong?
As follows from the previous phrase (which can be copied, not only forgetting to put the copyright:)), it is not in error. Mistakes here and there can not be. Impression of the game is a personal matter, but this opinion is judged on the taste. It is as the arithmetic mean of one group of people (gamers), stratum of society, community, team or just like-minded people on the site, which abound on both sides... Can only hope that it is not heavily loaded, trying to defend their right to define your tastes as"sad and flawed :-)
I Troll only Pitch-children.
To blaspheme the sacred is trolling, even if you did not realize ) Well, you never know. For example, people used to cuss, he is a natural part of speech. And it may seem strange that someone starts complaining...
As for Morrowind, the masterpiece among cheshek considered to be too many to some special master had started to carry outright heresy to the legends )
Fourth full of idiotic innovations (like a stray mobbo and heroes in battles), which play them normally impossible.
The same. Well, no taste, no. The fourth Characters must be seen as a strategy for only 50%. The rest is RPG-constituting, as strange as it may sound. This Quartet is unique among the entire series.
that's quite a decent remake of the third in a new graphic design.
Trimmed in many respects a remake of a decent can not be. Only graphics and takes over the soul of... somebody. To equate the five to the legendary third part also a form of heresy.
Well duck th worse?
Don't know, not played... :DDD
Edited.
2 Kahneeta
And you have shit. Free.
Personal opinion about the game can not be challenged
Personal opinion? I'm about gumtree cite the facts. There besprovodnaya crown? No lengthy? No attempts at horror?
we can only point out his inadequacy, inferiority, lack of objectivity and just sick of the taste
Decided to taxi without an argument? What is this lepota in General? I then have about any of your point of view I can say.
To blaspheme the sacred is trolling, even if you did not realize
Holy? Weird.
The same. Well, no taste, no.
Well, Yes. Just Heroes 4 for everybody. The Amateur shit.
The rest is RPG-constituting, as strange as it may sound.
And there from an RPG?
Trimmed in many respects a remake of a decent can not be.
Oh, and what is writenote fifth characters compared to three?
To equate the five to the legendary third part also a form of heresy.
Obviously you somewhere on my mind. Where I said that I was their equal?
Don't know, not played... :DDD
Cock, th.
For example, I can play 5 Heroes in the first place because of the graphics and interface. Maybe if you get involved, then the gameplay is there and good, but why the need it, if I from the visual part of the Heroes 5 want to puke after luxury in this plan Heroes 3. Especially killed appearance of Inferno and its monsters (and the animation in battle), some sort of parody. It is not serious. Another would be pokemon there added as a separate castle.
And that is why, as a herd, screaming that Heroes 4 is the shit remains a mystery to me. The impression is that it's just a stereotype. Playing Heroes 4 with intervals a little less than a hero 2,3, nearly 10 years, and no significant weaknesses there was not noticed (not to compare it with other parts, but taken as a separate game). Although the difference in these parts are striking, and the replayability of Heroes 3 for a couple of steps higher, but its advantages it also has. More detail on this matter, I have already spoken earlier, has no desire to repeat.
Fourth full of idiotic innovations (like a stray mobbo and heroes in battles), which play them normally impossible.
The same. Well, no taste, no.
Well, Yes. Just Heroes 4 for everybody. The Amateur shit.
The rest is RPG-constituting, as strange as it may sound.
And there from an RPG?
You horses, save. You, of course, done that Salatino quenched, but 4-ka - a unique phenomenon in the series. These gorgeous RPG-shnye tactical battle groups of heroes, pumped absolutely unique, inspirational campaign, a platform for creating brilliant RPG-cards, of which there were dozens. There are a lot of cons, but the pros just huge, if they mean something to the player.
As for Morrowind, the masterpiece among cheshek considered to be too many to some special master had started to carry outright heresy to the legends )
The legend, confession, heresy. It's all your arguments, Salad. I have the feeling that you are actually not playing these games. You've even obsession with 4-5 series no. You represent, to boast, to assert itself. And the time you spend in verbal fetishism on the forums and stupid dreams.
Well, I'll tell you something that in Morrowind the NPCs are in place - a serious disadvantage in comparison with the same Oblivion.
Trimmed in many respects a remake of a decent can not be. Only graphics and takes over the soul of... somebody.
Now, Slatina, let's imagine that Heroes 5 was released in 1999 (with appropriate graphics), and Heroes 3 in 2005, too, with appropriate graphics.
Let's see - in the fifth, each being an average of 2-3 real features (and sometimes 6-7). In the C grade also about half of the features we see the proud no, and think about it, even the creatures of the 7th level.
In the fifth there is an alternative improvement in the third - no.
In the fifth pumping system will give a light to any modern dragon Paju and will compete with the best systems from Hensley. In the third pumping is based on 3 upgrades 15 abilities (5, 10, 15 percent). This is the level of Batman.
The original campaign 3 heroes was just terrible. In the fifth campaign one - but what is its magnitude, what plot connection.
The fifth in a multiplayer game is duel mode, in the third - no.
Special racial abilities in the fifth make the game as different characters is truly diverse. In the third racial characters are different... 1 primary characteristics..
So, a Salad like normal people (not a pathetic verbal fetishists and posers like you) called three in 2005? I do not cut-do shit?
Old games much more cling. The first impressions from immersion in the virtual world of old games seemed to be something unknown and new. Maybe we're just stuck. For example, the younger generation make me play Doom. He asks, how can you even play the game with this square graphics, and we (who grew up on these toys) could remember the past (Doom, Dune, Resident evil 1-3, Silent Hill 1 part Diablo, 1 part).
Well, Yes of course the old better, but why play the new...
Old times are good, and play one of them, why climb on a forum of new games, with its objective criticism? And then decided that Heroes 3 is better 5? I prefer the fifth, and reverse does not prove it, because personal opinion, it is all different and undeniable, and you are writing the game xxx the first part, better games xxx the second part of forget to put IMHO. By the way, why there is no subject which color is prettier, green or blue? A comparison of games such as Morrowind and Oblivion, heresy, and like the true fans love the series, not for the number of skills and the interface, but for quite another.
And why put IMHO? Tea is not downs, I hope, will understand that the post of the person under the name xxx belongs to the person under the name xxx.
New games to convincingly play crap then this game, or keeping a timid hope that turned out all the same shit, it is good to compare.
Older the better... Although some new ones too... nothing Fallout 3 ( In the first 2 unfortunately failed to play...) Skyrim... (Please don't throw stones !) IU 1-3.