These games are better old or new?

jarud
P. S. revenge))
I mean? For finger pointing?))

Yes))

Older the better...but some new and sometimes surprising:)

Alba felis
Yeah..
jarud
Now lost the thread. You previous post I took revenge? Hmm...

revenge,what are you?

jarud

What... Um.. Cute. Cat...

*hmm... he said something about revenge, now pretends that nothing happened... what could it be?*

the angry dinosaur - don't eat my cat!

jarud
It was delicious! ^_^

Well viplan it quickly! :)

I have a stick))

jarud
Just don't hook it on my tail!!

Do not cling!!

Festr..
Cling to me! Cling to me completely! Fully cling to me! *shaydabeg Asadullaev face*

Festr..
No, no don't need to cling to.
And then you're a dangerous creature, I saw you, is this your handiwork??
Spoiler
A second before the big PI...

FC Shakhtar Donetsk
He's my fish tooth poked...

che then I do not understand what the fuss is about here...the old game was certainly interesting, but until not out a new. I was much more interesting to play quake 2 after the first part and the Duma, then that...Oh yeah was cs 1.6 and Halfa will agree that many have forgotten about the first quake, and just as growth has varied addiction to games, I played KSS on the grid and all.

new better than old in 90% of cases. all are not called and here heroes 3 certainly was better than all subsequent games in the universe. well, add that TES 5 I was more fun to play eat the 4th on the account of a third not to say for throwing poop

Among new face and a good, not inferior to the old. Choose a compromise: a or ;)

Don't know how in other genres, but among the classic, thoroughbred PC shooters first-person new is definitely worse.
Perhaps this is due to the fact that developed for some time now mostly focus on console, PC is already secondary. And ports from consoles are usually poorly played on the PC.
Play, for example, in some Crysis 2 or F. E. A. R. 3, or Far Cry 3, and from them emanates the a"console in General design that in detail that in the gameplay. Now, if on their PC versions better job... Although they would have then all to alter.

There is still, of course, a lot depends on what people are looking for in the game. Here I want design, atmosphere, fun but not stupid gameplay, setting to like... but with these requests I can play for a long time not in that, in addition to Unreal, Half-Life, FarCry, Doom 3, Half-Life 2 and Halo and F. E. A. R.

So for me old PC shooters obviously better, just because no FPS older than 2005 I stupidly don't like.

Here and there are cool

Old is better because they were made with soul and now almost everyone is stamps, not the best quality. I said ALMOST because among the new games are sometimes also found worthy.

old better they unsteamed was uteplyali. from Novyj only portal hooked SV poslednee while the rest of banalno shit in shooters krumov vsyakoy. early on tiger was to break away nelissa.

New games are now mostly rolling in HS, I'm not talking about the stupid attempt to cut the dough developers and publishers in the movies and cartoons and shit.
Many students think that the new taxis with grafon. But it's not.
Let the kids and play in the sruzis, their opinion has not formed yet.
Quality does not mean new, high-quality talent means the realized product.
As old school has its pros and cons in Iguodala and twin tips has them.
And that rather depends on the presence of a brain of developers themselves at any time, and how they are willing to say about myself..