4k 60Hz or 2k 144Hz (30t.r.)

WaFFeN WolF
I for the sake of preserving the FPS, even taking into account the renewal of the card in the near future, took a fulchd on 27 inches-Acer Nitro XV270Pbmiiprx, and in 2k to squeeze 144 hertz you have to try again
WaFFeN WolF wrote:
And 970 and the truth supports only (Dual Link DVI, HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.2) well at least HDR started to rivet with this series))) there is a fix for 970 - DP 1.4
and about this info did not know, wanted to buy a display port 1.4 just for comparison, but could not find with minidisplayport version at one end, and here it turns out and there is no sense, generally sit on HDMI 2.0 and normally gives out 165 hertz in 1080r

SPR1GGAN
27-inch-Acer Nitro XV270Pbmiiprx 1920x1080, with such features;
Pixel size - 313 microns
Pixel density - 81 ppi
HDR10 - 250 Kd/m2 (6 bits q FRC)
Your eyes haven't turned into pixels yet???
"Sometimes the bigger the diagonal doesn't mean the better!"

and to squeeze 144 hertz in 2k you have to try again.
I'm sure the 2070s are quite good at handling this, not to mention 2080Ti
The 970 in FH4 on high and 2 x 2k gives out 65fts....HDR play is a pleasure...
144Hz I'm not chasing it, I can put 120-100Hz and it will still be better than 60Hz...

WaFFeN WolF wrote:
Your eyes haven't turned into pixels yet???
That's the point that no, then read these comments in reviews, went to the store and long searched where there these pixels, as well as where the best picture on 2k resolution, for itself it did not find, in 4k already the difference was noticeable, but it is an henrile for the price and fps.

WaFFeN WolF wrote:
"Sometimes the larger the diagonal doesn't mean the better!
in this case it was really better and I did not regret that I gave these 1.5k p for 27 inches instead of 24, those who regretted the monique, too pixels did not find
yes, and to get off for a card 80-100k is fat for me

WaFFeN WolF wrote:
Your eyes haven't turned into pixels yet???
That's the point that no, then read these comments in reviews, went to the store and long searched where there these pixels, as well as where the best picture on 2k resolution, for itself it did not find, in 4k already the difference was noticeable, but it is an henrile for the price and fps.

WaFFeN WolF wrote:
"Sometimes the larger the diagonal doesn't mean the better!
in this case it was really better and I did not regret that I gave these 1.5k p for 27 inches instead of 24, those who regretted the monique, too pixels did not find
yes, and to get off for a card 80-100k is fat for me

SPR1GGAN
If you're happy, I'm just happy for you! And I didn't want to hurt you...
I also walked for a long time and watched firsthand what it all looks like. Thought to take the SAMSUNG C32JG50 qi : 31.5", wanted more screen. But from what I saw I just fell into a slight shock, in 2 stores ds'e and eldorado twisted trailer NFS Payback
Spoiler
And I saw a eerie grid of pixels in very light parts of the scene, it immediately caught my eye, I stood less than a meter, as if I was sitting in front of the monitor at home. Nearby was 27" Monitor Asus TUF Gaming VG27A similar to the haract. Acer Nitro XV272UPbmiiprzx, the difference in picture (quality) was simple, heaven and earth...

SpoilerSAMSUNG C32JG50 : 31.5 q Acer Nitro XV272UPmiiprzx 27
2560x1440
Pixel size 272 microns q 233 microns
Pixel density 93 ppi q 109 ppi

WaFFeN WolF wrote:
If you're happy, I'm just happy for you! And I didn't want to hurt you...
Yes, I just wrote off my opinion, no hurting I did not notice, you also expressed your.
WaFFeN WolF wrote:
NFS Payback trailer
I looked at him now on his moniker, I didn't notice anything.

the difference in pictures is there between the display port and hdmi? Didn't test?

SPR1GGAN
SPR1GGAN wrote:
the difference in pictures is there between the display port and hdmi? Didn't test?
On 970 dp 1.2 so from 1.4 washed away yet. Read from above what I got out of the way .
They write that DP 1.4 is needed for the work of 144Hz freeSync.
FreeSync goes only with nvidia 1hh series
Now I'm sitting with my family from Monica HDMI 2.0 q 144Hz HDR

P/S - in a couple of months I will test DP 1.4 with the new nvidia))

What do you say, which one to choose?
LG UltraGear 32GK850F-B 31.5 (VA, 400kd/m brightness, 8 bits)
Spoiler http://www.citilink.com.au/catalog/computers_and_notebooks/monitors/1079650/

ASUS TUF Gaming VG32V's 31.5 (VA, 400kd/m, 8 bits)
Spoiler http://www.citilink.com.au/catalog/computers_and_notebooks/monitors/1374051/

LG GL83A-B 27 (Nano IPS, 350 kd/m, 8 bits q FRC)
Spoiler http://www.dns-shop.com.au/product/423746f639023332/27-monitor-lg-27gl83a-b-27gl83a-baruz/opinion/

LG GL850-B 27 (Nano IPS, 400kd/m, 8 bits q FRC)
Spoiler http://www.dns-shop.com.au/product/e8b6d7d222a61b80/27-monitor-lg-27gl850-b/

Asus TUF Gaming VG289 q 28 4K (IPS, 350 kd/m, 8 bits q FRC)
Spoiler http://www.dns-shop.com.au/product/1232c8913e831b80/28-monitor-asus-tuf-gaming-vg289q-90lm05b0-b01170/characteristics/

WaFFeN WolF
27 and 28 inches don't even look - too small. By modern standards and 31.5 inches 4K - the most it and seeing 3070, 3080 quietly 4K stretched. But if 31.5 inches and 2k, I do not advise - soapy picture.

Protocol10
Acer Nitro XV272UPbmiiprzx 27 I liked, after my 21d. 27 seemed great but then got used to it. I'm sitting 70-80cm from the monitor.
4K and want, but 60Hz is not that ...

WaFFeN WolF
I took 32 inches 4k 60 Hz Philips 326M6VJRMB. I play with frisink constantly, so in general everything is fine and no 144 Hz is not necessary. Friesink makes the image very smooth to play comfortably. Mostly I play singles. In the cartoon played only that year in the new code, too, everything was fine. Before that I had a monitor aser 27 inches 120 hz and do not feel much difference.

Protocol10
I considered PHILIPS 326M6VJRMB 31.5 but (thick frames glossy, VA, 60hz, not necessary RGB) and all this for 45t, not ahti...

WaFFeN WolF
I see

People Help!!! Is there a punt? from the curved monitor if I, do not always sit strictly in the center and sometimes in 1.5-2m from it. I don't know what to choose:
ASUS TUF Gaming VG32VQ 31.5 VS LG 32GK850F-B 31.5

WaFFeN WolF
Of course it's a flat monitor. Compact, practical.

Marsj
Compact, practical.
Asus 713×425.68 × 96.26mm
LG 715.2×423.9 × 57.1mm
They are both 31.5d

I connected a TV set 4k and 60 fps and forgot about the monitor 144 Hz and 144 fps, 4k is just a super clear picture

torn22
Personally, I would choose a larger hertz than a 4k and 60 Hz monitor. Especially in online shooters, there is a big hertz, it’s, well, prooooooo tasty) Provided that the FPS matches her👍 However, who cares. But on the long diagonal it’s awesome to play football in strategy and football☝️

I chose 34" 21:9 3440*1440 165Hz, 1000R, there was a wow effect after 1920*
1080
144Hz look at a super-clear, but at the same time "torn", twitchy picture.