Denuvo has fallen! (Doom (2016))

alexzet3
is subjective

Everything is objective. Either you're plowing or you're out of the industry. Not everything is clear, and it always works out. And not everyone succeeds. Somewhere there was not enough experience, somewhere a budget, somewhere else something.

I see from the last one, two good ones.
Well, if you take this year. I see good doom, deus ex, uncharted 4, xcom2, dark souls 3, tomb raider, blood and wine ,. These are good games in the sense that they can be played to the end and enjoy the gameplay and sometimes the plot. In my understanding, it sucks when you demolish the game in the first hour.

and ten sludge for a couple of evenings.
I don't see any connection between the duration and quality of the game. If the game is completed in 10 hours, it does not mean that the game sucks.

rather a quick fix, and hope for advertising
Advertising does not always help to sell the game. The most important thing is the reaction of the gamers. If it is negative, then no advertising will save you.

Protocol10
Tomb Ryder-2, I disagree, IMHO sucks
meant that for me personally, it's a good game that I want to replay
and there are few
gamers' reaction? They are mostly a herd-example Dogs, Suckers and the
game code shit, but people hawala

Does anyone have a volcano working in a ripak?

alexzet3
Tomb Ryder-2, I do not agree, IMHO sucks

And what is the suck? In the first part, you put 10 points in your profile.

The second part is identical in gameplay. The plot, well, also the level of the first part. But at the same time, the first part you have a ten, and the second sucks. Everything is clear with you)), you just throw words to the right and to the left without any argumentation. OK good luck.

Protocol10
The first part, it was after a long break,
plus some novelties in the gameplay, well, for me personally, I didn't play adventure games,
that's why such an assessment.
In the new one, nothing new, even worse, running around the same locks endlessly! In the old one it was the same, but less,
maybe she looked.
On the screenshot you made, you can see the game is 13 years old, wait if I'm not mistaken 16,
but everything is the same, sorry, but this is not a new part, this is by the

way objectivity - a myth, boy, if you grow up, you will understand!
only the machine is objective, and it depends on what algorithm the creator laid down))

I’ve dum3 first went through a pirate, then I acquired a license for my daddy's lave.
Now I tried doom4, I see it as a day, I won't give them my money, oh I won't, but it's very cool to chop up monsters for what halva ...)))

alexzet3
I understood you. If the game is nothing new, it sucks.

Here are your COD scores
Call of Duty (10/29/2003) 9 out of 10
Call of Duty 2 (10/24/2005) 9 out of 10
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (11/10/2009) 9 out of 10
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare ( 11/06/2007) 9 out of 10
Call of Duty: World at War (11/11/2008) 9 out of 10

Nothing new, but you make nines for everyone? A stall came out in which there is nothing new, but you call it sucks. OK. Objectivity is clearly not yours, my friend.

By the way, objectivity is a myth, boy, if you grow up, you will understand!
only the machine is objective, and it depends on what algorithm the creator laid down))
Well, what kind of nonsense are you talking about. Go at least to the wiki and read the definition of this concept.

Protocol10
yes! There are games where, even without innovations, it is interesting
to play, and more than once
in the code (old parts) I did not run the whole game on one lock!
in 1 part still somehow rolled, but the second time ??!
but they gave me three bows and 5 pistols !! on *** ???

yeah, in Wikipedia, it's clear
you are 15 years old,
look later in life, in 10 years,
although ... many even at 70 believe
age is not an indicator of naivety

alexzet3
Ok. Good. Look. You started the conversation with the fact that the developers do not strain and do not throw all their strength into the game.
- "well, or such **** they have the strength! that after the throw is garbage))"
- "rather a quick finish, and hope for advertising"
- "but that other studios are throwing all their strength into playing nonsense"
- " yes! there are games where even without innovations it is interesting
to play, and more than once "

So the point is that any next part of COD is a quick fix and hope for advertising. That is, it turns out that you yourself blame the developers for being lazy, they do not make innovations, the main emphasis is on advertising, and so on. But at the same time, you yourself play these games with pleasure and say that it is interesting for you to play them, and moreover more than once. So why then, according to your words, the developers throw all their strength into the game if you are already interested in playing them and playing them repeatedly if you already hava this threshing floor with great pleasure?

Protocol10
they became a finishing touch after about MV3
and then it is generally not very good to compare pure action with an adventure game ??))
he took it differently
))

alexzet3
they became finishing touches after MV3
Yes, they are all parts of finishing touches. Every year they rivet the same thing, but people like you praise, give nines and tens and ask for more. At the same time, the same people on the forums whine that the developers are lazy, they rivet the same finishing touches every year without innovations and leave due to advertising. Then a new part of the code comes out and again they mold nines and tens and provide sales and again go whining on the forum. And so everything goes in a circle.

And then it's not at all very good to compare a pure action game with an adventure game ??))
Larka is not a pure adventure game. This is an action (action) and adventure and platform game.

Protocol10
well, this is the problem of idiots who give such ratings!
for me personally, the code died after the CF
before that there were no finishing touches! each was different, and it was interesting

in that and the salt! that they tried to combine, but at the exit, not one of the three
and the barn-3 in one