Beta Optimization (Battlefield 1)
Reading various comments, one gets an ambiguous impression of optimization: personally, with a rather modest config, i5 3570, r9 280x - the settings are fully ultra in Full HD - about 60fps. The minimum saw 55. Everything seems to be fine, but many complain about the optimon.
Who has how much and on what?
Five-Six
Set the Resolution Scale to 50% in the video settings. Maybe because of this.
solovey2003
where does the network and FPS? if it was thrown back, double shot, the damage did not go through, then this is a network, and here the client part is stupid.
Turok307
After half an hour of playing all my 12GB eats, in Alpha this was not. The picture is soap, weapon balance, no classes. Again, after the release, they will balance for a couple of years, to be honest. As I was disappointed in the beta, most likely I will cancel the pre-order.
At ultras, fps is 50-60. The only problem (very significant) every 5 seconds the game freezes. I came out from behind the shelter to shoot, hung, hung - you are already dead. Changing the settings doesn't help. I5-4590 8GB GTX 970 systems.
IIpocTo_urpok
the same problem on gx7 770 i5 4570 - reduced the resolution scale to 30 - the whole round worked perfectly, only high latency jumped 2-3 times, and the next round starts to freeze again ... My brother does not have these hangs on a weaker computer
I read the comments and sit mocking the guys who say about the 900 series 10 series that everything is cool with them, the latest models and there can be no talk of friezes, the point is in the 600 series 700 670 2gb in 720! the resolutions for the minimum and medium are the same frieze and the fps sinks to 30 places for some unknown reason and I catch a mini freeze for 2 seconds
SPR1GGAN
Gtx1060 is this top? Top is 1080, well, 1070 can be attributed to top cards
Guys, the problem on my 970th gives out at low to 30 fps, and on the ultra, and in general maximum 20 !! what is the problem ? updated firewood for the last.
Intel (R) Core (TM) i5-3570K
24525 MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
200 to 6o fps at a minimum of no freezes, no lags
fx 4300
gtx 960 4gb
8gb RAM
windows 10 x64
resolution 1280x1024
settings for cars were set to average
for 64 players, sags to 31 fps, on average 50, but I did not see 24 players below 50
Is there SLI in Battle, or is it still necessary to wait for the full release of the game ??????
i5-3570 + 750ti + 16gb RAM, medium settings. The minimum FPS was during the storm - 44, the rest of the time 55-70 FPS, percent 70-98%, vidyaha 100% (that's understandable)) everything suits, the graphics in the game are chic, the optimism is good, the gameplay is also good, only a lot of vegetables in the team )
In general, I started the game on i3 4130, GTX650, 8gb in the window at the lowest to play comfortably from 30 to 45 fps, although there are rare friezes, but the full screen freezes is already terrible.
Shock Burst
I consider my 970 top, since all the games, if not ultra, then near it, if only I bought a 980 at one time, it would be possible to change it all early at the same time with 970, it makes sense to overpay 10k xs
According to the subject, on the default settings 80-90 FPS, the config in the profile I set
ultra, it became 90))
who has a drawdown of the FSP, perhaps there are not enough frequencies on the test