Graphics in Far Cry! (Far Cry)
So I thought if it was possible to do even better veri hard ... and suddenly it is possible ... I play 1680x1050 2x anti-aliasing and everything is at max..30-25 frames +) at lower resolution everything is large .. monic is not small just +) there is version 1.33, I don’t know if it’s worth switching to 1.4 what it will give in the schedule ... we areunsubscribing not that you forgot the great headlights edge =)
Change the monitor to 1920x1080 120Hz + a powerful system unit with 2 video cards and you will get the highest possible quality picture ... I personally am more impressed by the frame rate than the graphon in general, because playing at 120 frames is very comfortable!
Jack Carver [Dr. Moreau Island]
AGREE !!! Someone appreciates the realism in graphics, while others - purely artistic beauty. I am for the latter!
Traigen
And I like to argue with reason. :)
Deadh2000, two video cards will not be stable. Moreover, with 120 frames, the image no longer moves, but flies. Because of what the same "comfort" falls.
Guys, enter the conversation. Please, otherwise I can't understand the meaning. (:
Moreover, with 120 frames, the image no longer moves, but flies. -Khhh ...
This is nonsense!
Jacks0n, why? For me, for example, the game is going too fast. Even too much. I did not find a solution.
I would be able to shoot.
JetRanger, in words. So in words.
By sight, it seems more than 150 FPS. The game does not just move, frame by frame, but moves at the speed of a running person. Constantly, damn it, some bands that appear every 15-20 seconds and instantly disappear. Perhaps, the video card driver will be updated to a newer one, but I don't think that anything will change. But it's worth trying.
Stripes, you say ... This, of course, is bad. Although what has to do with FPS, I still don't understand.
Have you changed the refresh rate of the screen? Once my image in games suddenly began to "strip" for no apparent reason, but as soon as I changed the refresh rate from 60 to 75, this ripple became almost invisible.
Jacks0n
FPS in games is not the same as FPS in movies or elsewhere. What's the
difference between them?
Jacks0n, what's the matter then? I can't put down the HDR and DX11 effects in advance, the steam version hasn't been updated to 1.3.
TRIGEN
What a surprise so surprise! (c) I really didn't know this yet. Although if I had known, I would still not have turned on this HDR, I do not like it.
JetRanger, what's wrong with that? Unusual?
There is no patch 1.3 on FC incentive. That's all there is to it.
JetRanger
I agree with Jack Carver, the game looks much better than the modern multi-platform, and if you also put mods on textures ....
Just for some, this is a child's game, and the graphics in it will always be better than in other games.
By the way, many people want Far Cry on the Crysis 1 engine, that is, CryEngine 2, but I, on the contrary, want Crysis on the Farkrai engine. Because, no matter how many people don't like the first krayzis, but it has vomiting shooting physics, it's nice to hit enemies in the Farkrai
Jak Iv Kusto
I would also like Crysis at the first CryEngine. It's just that my video card is too weak for CryEngine 2 graphics - it does not pull it at high settings. But about the physics of shooting in Crysis - in vain you say so about it, personally to me and in Farah and in the Crisis it is equally pleasant to shoot.
Jack Carver.
I agree that, in general, earlier the picture, although technically inferior to the current one, was much nicer to the eye, and largely due to the lack of post-filters that are fashionable now.
JetRanger
Still, shooting there does not feel as good as in Far Cry, in the Farik the recoil is so soft and pleasant to shoot, but in Crysis it is twitchy.