Crackdown 3
Release date: 2019
Platform: XBO, Win10
Developer: Reagent Games
Genre: Action-RPG
Modified on September 14, 2018 by Ozu
The prize "The most ridiculous shit of the exhibition" goes here, simply without options. For what purpose are they doing this misunderstanding at all?
With a price tag of $ 20, maybe a couple of people will buy it. But if the MCs push it for $ 60 ...
1 hour ago, Maximus said:
It means they canceled Scalebound, but they didn't guess IT.
I think they would have canceled that too if they still had games for the fall. But they are not
3 minutes ago, P3X said:
I think they would have canceled that too if they still had games for the fall. But they are not
I don't think they could have canceled the game, the game has a penny budget and they will beat back the development costs anyway
I wonder if cloud technology is so bad that it won't be shown until release, or do they think everyone has just forgotten about it?
At 23.07.2017 at 22:09, TheVS said:
I wonder if cloud technology is so bad it won't be shown until release or they think
yes, in general, some kind of strange garbage, maybe they will show multiplayer at least in game, let them add a step-by-step mode there on a completely destructible map and get a worms clone
in general, in this story, the most pity for Terry Crews, people so wanted to get into a video game, but got into a crackdown 3
ms as compensation, he must select a character in gear after such
The strangest thing - well, you realized that it is impossible to design a game for full destructibility, well, they removed it, but why not leave at least a partial one? Looks wild when firing a rocket launcher, and even the bench does not break there
30 minutes ago, SENEL said:
There it is ... destructibility only in the cartoon type promised.
And in order not to scare away - they will not show multiplayer before the release.
11 hours ago, SENEL said:
There it is ... destructibility only in the cartoon type promised.
At the beginning of development, destructibility was supposed to be in the single too, wasn't it?
Just now, Brontozyvr said:
At the beginning of development, destructibility was supposed to be in the single too, wasn't it?
Destructibility was promised only for the cartoon. Because otherwise it is an online binding of a single and the inability to play after the servers are disconnected.
But if you drop it in Google, in the very announcement, then the single should have had minimal destructibility with restrictions, whatever that means.