Disappointment in modern games.
Surely you also fell for the idea that now in the games is a disappointment. But is it from the point of the gaming industry, or it is the perception of the player, really?I'm wildly nostalgic for the old games somewhere until the end of 2012. Any new game I have is in my head to compare with the old. He began to play computer games in the early 2000-ies.
And I do not know: either I'm stupid or do not go skiing. Because to live in the past and look back - no good. You need to live in the present. But to me, these modern games don't like me, I have some cons I see. I forcibly can't bring myself to like a certain game. That's the question.
Because for me, games are the only thing I have much interest in. Of course, I'm not some nerd who plays 24/7. Play in moderation, work and earn. But that was the feeling before, when waiting for the announcement and release of a game that you wildly liked, and waited a long time for her sleep and see her in her sleep. Now no such feeling.
So in General, it's a problem that I don't like new games and I live of old, or indeed the game is now wrong?
MagicHero
Yes 2012 I wrote about, then he, too, fit game was. For example, Battlefiled 4, which I still play.
From your list I only played Far cry 3 and Fallout 4. The other type of the Witcher and strategies I don't play, so they can not say anything.
If you take into account, for example, in 2007, CoD MW 1-2, Stalker, ETQW, Crysis, Portal, L4D, GTA 4, Fallout 3, Vegas, Batman Arkhem, Mafia 2, Battlefield 3. In all this I played and I like these games, maybe missed something.
Int0xicate
CoD BO2 is better CoD MW 1-2 (movie), Crysis 3 better than Crysis (krayzis the first is that the graphics sucked and the gameplay was terribly boring and after several attempts was not able to complete the game), Fallout 4 better than Fallout 3, Vegas (the biggest problem of the 3rd folica is the color palette that just killed all desire to play, although I'm a fan of the first 2 parts), GTA 5 better than GTA 4 (for all positions as optimization and geypley, in suratku not played but in the cartoon to hang you), Batman Arkham Knight, Batman Arkham better (I mean the first part). As you can see even continue already better than what you have listed and then the question is why are you disappointed in the modern industry if new games even the series get better?
... the first krayzis is that the graphics sucked...
... THE GRAPHICS SUCKED...
(long silence) ... graphomotor never cease to amaze me :-| ...
Games not dead, dead only desire to spend time with him. Maybe the author of the banal duckling syndrome.
Anderby
Anderby wrote:
It is also, incidentally, infantilism to think that food appears in stores, replica in the movie itself is written by the actors, and games are made by enthusiasts.
Not really. There are a number of released games from the publisher, created by enthusiasts, and existing in the form of mods before the advent of investors.
The gaming industry as a whole built by enthusiasts. Their endeavors formed its further development. Otherwise, what businessman would invest in absolutely unpredictable industry?
MagicHero
MagicHero wrote:
Crysis 3 better than Crysis
It's too easy.
Old Codger wrote:
graphomotor
As something bad.
Gauguin
Well, you know, to appreciate the game only the graphics, not paying attention to anything else, how unfair?
Int0xicate wrote:
Surely you also fell for the idea that now in the games is a disappointment.
Not always, I loved not so long ago released game Tales of Berseria, quite fit was GTA 5, though the fourth part I liked in the story and gameplay more than GTA 5. Seasonal Hitman 2016 too pleased, however was very short and a muddy plot.
Int0xicate wrote:
And I do not know: either I'm stupid or do not go skiing.
I don't think you need to go to extremes. Although need to accept that some good series tend to okazualivatsya. For example, the series of TES. Morrowind was at the time very much challenging game, Oblivion has already taken a somewhat simplistic view, but have not yet come to polyanaline Skyrim where you can't even repair weapons and armor, and magical components are simplified so that came down to buying /finding books. So I personally don't even expect TES 6 because I believe there can be a disappointment...
Int0xicate wrote:
Because to live in the past and look back - no good.
Yeah, well...? There are a lot of old toys that can involve no less than a modern-publicized garbage. Here, for example. Dreamfall: The Longest Journey (2006) good enough to not skip, and the first part of The Longest Journey (1999)is also quite interesting. Space Rangers (2002)will surely be able to beat ME Andromeda on many points. Of course, it's hard to beat all-all games, but this does not mean that everything old is not good.
Int0xicate wrote:
So in General, it's a problem that I don't like new games and I live of old, or indeed the game is now wrong?
There is a close relationship. Games depend on players, players depend on the games. So while there will be demand for any bullshit, and bullshit is no where to stay. We also have two bad games to choose less bad, about somehow so...
Int0xicate wrote:
So in General, it's a problem that I don't like new games and I live of old, or indeed the game is now wrong?
If you can measure yourself by, to gauge your tastes from the outside, it is very good, amazing ability ))
Although tastes differ, but talking about something else. On the relation to all new games basically. If you are old 2010-2012 games, I can't understand the reason for the dislike of the games 2017-2018, because the level of dialogue is very similar, although it's been six years, and this is no joke. Compare, for example, the graphics in the game Duke Nukem 3D (1996) and rage (2002). The difference - 6 years, and it is very noticeable if you compare the chart. And Quake 2 and Unreal 2? Also 6 years difference, but you sure see that one - the old senile beside the other, according to the chart, if. Things are different now: for 6 years, the dialogue changes slightly, the only difference is in the details (hair, grass, more diverse, etc)...
The problem is that about and not only modern players perceive the game very differently. Those who have always played for the challenge and the actual games still play well now. And those who searched the games notorious plot, the atmosphere and deeper meaning, quickly losing interest.
I have never in my life had nogames. On the contrary, I often experience despair. Games too much and all want to go to the maximum.
And here's another tip for sufferers - try something new. Never get hung up on something one. Whether it's an old game new, certain genres, etc. I can now play fierce hardcore 70-90s. And tomorrow, to include a modern game on the highest difficulty. The day after tomorrow to play in a retro jrpg, then a jrpg, then a tactical game. Retro platformers are replaced by modern platformers. Constantly experiment with games and genres. It is not necessary to go in the frame.
Int0xicate
Doing the same work you become a master of his craft. Develop and want growth in your career.
You just evolved!
I think in any year you can find cool games (I personally have the opposite problem with time for all the games that interest me),only problem is that the trend consolida and forgiveness games on the face,although again thanks to Kickstarter, even in today's situation, we have such great games like Divinity: Original Sin 1,2,1,2 Pillars of Eternity,Wasteland 2.
If you take the shooter,then there is of course sad,console kintz with avtoregen and the aim rules,DooM 4, perhaps the only Titan of the old school which is really very much in 2016,here's a game where after every shooting get just a bunch of impressions,I really hope that in the future will be like shooters,there are of course a wolf but it is much simpler and more primitive.
saa0891
On a PC, no hardcore. Always been savestate and other cheating. Hardcore native console and arcade fun.
Avtoregen and auto-aim is on the stove. Second, you can always disable it. And the first eve players. You see, it is complicated. And hardcore pekashniki almost never ran the game on maximum difficulty. In the best case just high put. But citerat terrible.
Ghost Hunter wrote:
On a PC, no hardcore. Always been savestate and other cheating. Hardcore native console and arcade fun.
Funny,I suggest you at least follow Xcom 2 on the terminator,and hardcore is not the case,and much more complex mechanics,variety and when the player you want to use your brain like a version of the game that I have listed above.
Ghost Hunter wrote:
Avtoregen and auto-aim is on the stove.
Of course it developed follow the General trend of development,although again come across such diamonds as DooM 4.
And to add. Play with avtoregen on the maximum complexity is often more difficult than fixed health. Because too little health and too much damage. I can without any problems go Doom and quake on Nightmare. But for example Gears of War 2 on max just unbearable. But then again, even on ultra, these genres are nothing special. Unlike some native arcade genres.
saa0891
There's no hardcore. Difficult, stressful, furious, but not hardcore. All of this follows the method of brute force.
Ghost Hunter wrote:
There's no hardcore. Difficult, stressful, furious, but not hardcore. All of this follows the method of brute force.
You do not understand what is hardcore.
saa0891
That's hardcore. Here we need a transcendent response. You'll take years of training and not the fact that to learn to play. Here is pure skill, no brute-force attack, saves statov no, single SIM in the entire game. And then, this game is quite passable.
Add. To play these games you need a gaming monitor with input lag of up to 9 MS. Connect the monitor only analog cables. All digital is useless here. Controller or arcade stick or a good joy. The clave doesn't feel pressing. Well, a lot of patience and perseverance, commercials about 5 years of schooling =)
There is pure cramming. Just learn all the attacks after hundreds and thousands of drains. The complexity is achieved hypnotic music and spread recommended that tires in the trash for a couple of hours, not pellets. And next game again to cram every attack?)
Typical Asian approach, nerdy for the nerd. Whereas Western game making their hardcore games offered to use the head. The ability to think quickly, it useful ability to Dodge specific attacks specific boss specific game on a specific difficulty level. Because games a lot, will sweat to learn, and my head is always with you. An example is the two genres. The wargames and simulations. The last refuge of the hardcore. To solve the problem with available resources, trying different options and selecting the best, not to hit the buttons like a madman. This is useful in real life, unlike.
Saves...the saves don't help you with a platoon of green streight and two guns, which in forehead the tanks do not take, destroy five German tanks supported by infantry. But they will give you the opportunity to go to bed. If the person refuses food and sleep for the sake of the game, especially as squalid as the next bulletball, he needs psychiatric help.