Quantum Break (technical problems)
Here's a Temka for a master race 4k 60 fps version (lol)
On my own behalf, I want to say that the port is complete lewdness
meanwhile, Remedy has degenerated like a baker's fak
and this is some kind of shame and disgrace
in short - these are the first games on the UVP do not judge strictly, v10 and dx12 shit that does not support anything, to play 4k ultra you need 8 GB of video, if you have it but does not work ..... well, lower the extension, etc. ...
Quantum Break will be available on Windows 10 only from the Windows Store on Tuesday, 4/5 at 6:00 AM PST. The game is an Universal Windows Application released for on the Universal Windows Platform, meaning that it's the next step in merging Windows and Xbox One into a unified ecosystem. It's a relatively new platform for both Microsoft and developers, and to my knowledge Quantum Break is the third AAA-game ever released on it (after The Rise of Tomb Raider and Gears of War Ultimate Edition). You can expect some bumps in the road during launch, it's a learning experience to us all and hopefully we can try to resolve any issues you might run into.
I pre-ordered the game for Xbox One and haven't received my pre-order bonus item Windows 10 code.
Microsoft states on the game product page on Xbox One marketplace that they will deliver codes to customers via Xbox system message within 7-10 days after the game has launched, meaning Friday 15th of April latest.
Does the game support overlay software for broadcasting / streaming, benchmarking or mods?
That's determined by UWP, and currently the platform doesn't support overlay software. Microsoft is aware of this and are working on improving UWP.
I'm receiving a "File IO Failulre" error notice and the game doesn't launch.
It's an issue caused by having a Unicode based user account. We're working on fixing it ASAP, will update this thread with the latest status.
Does Windows 10 support SLI or Crossfire?
Multiple GPU set-ups aren't currently supported by UWP / DirectX 12.
There's something wrong with my savegame.
Please make sure you're running the latest version of Windows 10. Older versions have a bug which might cause a savegame error when playing a game with multiple user accounts on the same PC. To be sure, switch your account before signing in to the Xbox app and launching the game.
How much bandwidth does the live action show streaming require?
The game includes 4 episodes of the live action show, each episode being approximately 25 minutes. Streaming these will be similar to streaming a half hour TV show on typical video streaming services.
My high-end AMD GPU doesn't run the game in 4K / Ultra.
Please check if you have the latest drivers installed. Having 8gb RAM is recommended for 4K / ultra settings.
The game looks grainy.
The film grain effect becomes heavy on some TVs when the sharpness setting is too high. Also check if the cloud save has picked up your Xbox One game version gamma / brightness settings and pumped up the PC settings simultaneously.
Jack looks like a pirate.
DRM might've accidentally triggered. Make sure you've logged into your Microsoft account before starting the game (thanks NeoGAF!).
The game doesn't fit on my hard drive.
Check that your game download / installation hard drive has enough space. The installation package is about 45 Gb, the live action show is streamed so you don't need to worry about fitting additional 75 Gb on your drive.
The game is taking forever to download.
Microsoft is working on this and trying to improve server caching.
The game runs slowly on my system which meets the minimum spec.
The game defaults to your screen resolution. Try lowering the resolution from the game's display settings.
Can I limit my framerate?
The game supports 60fps and the framerate is based on your system resources. Capping the framerate isn't supported.
Why is the PC version only on Windows 10 and sold only through the Windows Store?
The publisher decides where and on what platform to distribute the game.
How can I quit the game?
It's like Brokeback Mountain all over again ... You can exit Quantum Break just like any Windows 10 application, move the mouse cursor to the upper right corner and the regular [X] should appear.
new crutches surfaced - on 6 nuclear, the game does not start at all during the course
[quote name = "Maddoctor" post = "5137660" timestamp = "1460018285"] No. With this to the console players pliz. They will tell you about optimization and potential there. Here are only facts, personally verified. [/ Quote] I only see here how someone is trying to justify the purchase of a system with 980 on board. Although all the facts indicate that the game is badly optimized.
[quote name = "Limenox" post = "5137656" timestamp = "1460018064"] Submit your config. [/ quote] Submit, check.
All I see here is someone trying to justify buying a system with a 980 on board. Although all the facts indicate that the game is badly optimized.
Shown, check.
Let's clarify the situation.
Facts are an irrefutable thing and I, for example, do not see that you provide at least some of them here, except
links to unclear what sources and unclear what reviews, unclear from whom.
I, in turn, like some other people, write about how the game works for me.
I can't speak for others, and I posted a screen here and said that I could also file a video proof, although
to be honest, I am extremely lazy to do this.
Also, there is already a message that the game works on 760 (far from the freshest map). And it works at 1080p.
Goes judging by the commentary at the minimum, which is analogous to the Huang version, again with the exception of the reflections turned off at the minimum.
I saw firsthand both versions.
I don't think you need to be Mendeleev to understand that if we lower the graphics quality by the same 760 to at least 900r (I'm already silent about 720-Huanovsky),
then we will get not low but rather medium-high settings, which is actually higher than the soap on the console from the MC, since the PC version does not contain such
fiercely blurry pictures. At 720, and at all at 760, there will be Ultra in this case, or the same low-medium (+ reflections) Juan's but with 60 fps.
GPU 760 is much more powerful than the analogue 7850-7870 installed in the console from the MS. And this is also a fact.
It is also a fact that the person writing about the game on 760 has not yet indicated whether he was overclocking this card.
The fact is that the game hasn't received a single patch yet. These are all facts !!!
Facts-which is understood by any PC gamer who is a little bit versed in hardware and technology, and not a biased console gamer either.
Therefore, I do not need to justify anything, given a MUCH better picture in 2k (1440r).
I am writing what I saw myself and what I know de facto, but what I don’t know I am not going to write. I have no such habit.
Modified April 7, 2016 by Maddoctor[member = 'Chuvakstepan'], Well, that's what I was talking about.
At 1080p, 7950 is enough to play at Juan fps, but the resolution is higher. And it is it that in this game improves the quality of the picture the most.
The settings also improve, but to a lesser extent.
But yes, yes !!!!!! I'm crooked, in GameGPU too, and trying to justify the purchase of their cards :-D
Well, the fact that the lower limit is not due to 7850 (a la Juan, there are also drawdowns there and not stable 30 fps), but 7950-7970 is explained by screwed dx12,
instead of dx11 on Juan.
[member = 'Maddoctor'], gamegpu themselves write that at a screen frequency of 60hz, freezes begin, and on a 120hz monica everything is a beam. and they tested as a result on a 120 hertz monitor
eyes start to hurt from the picture. Well, she's really dirty, very much. Further meter everything is daubed. I play on medium-high, if I put the shadows on high, then terrible friezes begin. The game really goes very badly at first, and then it starts to produce a more stable picture. But it is clear that the port is somehow careless.
[member = 'Chuvakstepan'], I'm playing on a TV (projector) and I'm fine. There are no friezes.
I did not start on the monitor.
[member = 'DrakeN'], Don't forget that there is dx12, not 11 as with Juan.
Plus, there will be more patches for sure. But to say, like some, that you need two Titans to play is worthy of a clinic.
I actually led to this all this time.
Is the grafon cooler than Arkham Knight?
I have long resigned myself to textures - 2 GB is no longer enough for high ones, and in this case, apparently also for medium ones (in Knight, however, only low ones work normally for 2 GB).
I was nervous at first, but through scientific experiments I was convinced that the difference is very small and is expressed in the clarity / sharpness of the texture, which is visible only if you stand and stare at it. In dynamics, naturally, there is no difference at all.
Other settings are more important - detail, lighting (I still have not decided whether HBAO is good or does not give nichrome: icon_cool :)
But 30 fps at low KB for graphics is too little.
And as they wrote in the subject, if 780 is freezing ....: icon_evil:
Well, either wait for patches, or - "come on, come on, but goodbye!" : icon_mrgreen:
[member = OneOfThem],
And on the last Tomb Raider, how did this card show itself?
My processor is weak by today's standards, and this eternal holivar about not revealing the potential of the card ...
I periodically remember about it, then it passes)
I am constantly afraid that the FPS will not grow, and I have already changed 2 cards, and he is all grows and grows: icon_cool:
Mine - AMD Phenom x4 3.8 GHz.
Raider on high, no anti-aliasing, no soft shadows, with HBAO and sync in Geothermal Valley about 35-37 frames. In closed - under 50.
About 970 in times of normal prices gave a hint - showered with tomatoes. Once again. : icon_wink: It was necessary to take. Low textures in this game look like they are not loaded in other games, no kidding. Just tin.
On your process, the game, unfortunately, will not start at all, they did not support the old ones at all.
PS
On vidyuha level 760 I highly do not recommend taking it, the game looks just awful at low settings, this vidyuha does not pull averages even close. Modified on April 7, 2016 by OneOfThem
[quote name = 'OneOfThem' timestamp = '1460045718' post = '5138073'] Low textures in this game look like they are not loaded in other games, no kidding. Just tin. [/ quote]
I already saw in the video comparison: icon_lol:
This was in Betman before the first patch, though with the only difference that if you stand in front of them for a long, long time, they still loaded)
And about the prots where infa? Something is generally some kind of tin. Is it really necessary to cut their support on purpose? : icon_eek:
In general, I have already decided - let them go through the forest. Really - 1 game of average importance. Going from a good 7 to an incomprehensible 10 ...
Without KB, we will somehow live, the sinister Souls 3 is on its way - it will not let you get bored for a long time.
And there you see, in half a year they will finish like Batman. And 10 ku including: icon_lol:
And about the prots where infa?
Something is generally some kind of tin. Well, you see, they program on new libraries that are optimized for new versions of instruction sets, which are supported only on more or less new ones - and that's all, PPC, the old ones don't work anymore.
About the fact that the old ones do not start, I read it on overclockers, I don’t remember exactly, but I don’t recommend taking risks, I definitely saw this information.
KB is not friendly with gamepads at all? PS3 shaped gamepad with Moushenjoy does not see. Or is it Stora's fault?
[offtopic] [member = 'nagibator666'], motioninjoy is a useless ad crutch. I recommend this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ASRlTxtrM [/offtopic]
Modified April 7, 2016 by ZiGRaDWell, in short, I also tested this program code for 450 rubles. At 770 gtx at high it is a slideshow, at medium it is unplayable, at low it is "almost playable", if you can call it that, although I won't even try (20-30 frames). Money down the drain. At the highest settings, I did not notice any incredible graphics either. In general, I am not even upset, because this is what I expected.
neighing from the statements of the GameGpu they say at 280X at very high in the FHD it gives out stable 35-40 (generally more than 30 fps)
if what I say as the owner of this card
[member = 'SergeyLifenko'],))) I wish I had ordered a pizza with this money, by God.
[member = 'NightmareRUS'], 4k bro, 4k
I have been fighting with MS support for 2 days
[member = 'SergeyLifenko'] PPC, I hope you get your money back.
Although initially I did not want to buy it for that kind of money. And right now for 450r. confirmed for myself this whole situation.