Lags and fps 15-20 on new hardware (The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt)
Good day to everyone!, I ask you to help me with my new hardware, which is not very bad, the witcher lags terribly, only with the most minimal settings and with the minimum resolution it gives out a maximum of 15-20 fpsiron, no viruses, I don’t know what the problem is, help me fix the situation , also removed the grass from the game.My system requirements
vidyuha GTX 730 firewood updated to the latest version 365.19
ArcanBlast The
hardware is so-so, even my older hardware will be more powerful, but my maximum speed at Full HD is about 30 fps with drawdowns. I had to cut a little anti-aliasing, resolution, shadows and grass by a stop, and voila, 60 fps
ArcanBlast
Have you fallen from an oak tree? you have a vidyuha, not just under the witcher, she will hardly pull the games that came out 5 years ago, there is less than 750 (660) and you should not try to start
Bertenday wrote:
I have exactly the same hardware, only vidyuha GTX 750 (without TI), and also cruel lags, no matter how hard
I try. Come on? I have the same 750 ti, while at high 30-50 FPS, or are you one of those for whom 30 is unplayable?
The list of video cards for a comfortable game at high (not maximum) quality settings:
GeForce
GTX 480
GTX 570
GTX 660 (30-40 FPS)
GTX 750ti (30 FPS)
GTX 760 (40 FPS)
GTX 950 (40 FPS)
Radeon
HD 7870
R9 270 (30-40 FPS)
R9 370 (30-40 FPS)
All video cards below the level (in numbers in the name) will not cope with the game very well.
FPS varies on the power of the CPU and the amount of RAM, but the author of the topic has no problems with this.
the pozon has about half of the minimum required power of the video card,
so the witcher is not rushing, the
main thing is that he started,
but in this game the main plot of the
FPS and the grafon leave the grafon with a
large yellow pecaface.
I have almost the same problem and it is clearly due to vidyuhi. I bought a computer in the store there percent amd a10 5700 3.4. 2 TB hard. 8 GB of RAM. And the video card gt640 2 GB. And that Witcher 3, 15-20fps.
Now I want to buy a gtx 950 oc 2gb. I saw her performance on YouTube, but I don't know what about the processor. I want to ask if the processor in the game works from 5% to 90% ... Is this normal or is the processor weak? In general, I want to ask if the processor is normal?
ArcanBlast The
card is designed for multimedia and office programs.
In general, it makes no sense to twist the game settings - you still can't get a decent FPS.
Even if you overclock it and get a 20% increase, then even then you will not reach the required level.
Apparently, you took a ready-made block, because only sly-ass sellers could cram such garbage into a computer.
Roman Medved
processor is weak. most likely, it will drop in places below 30fps, for example, in cities, regardless of how many fps the video card will give.
I'm talking about ultra settings or close to them. how low or economy of cpu performance is scaled to the processor I do not know.
Roman Medved
It's strange that AMD A10 also came with a video card. This processor already has a built-in graphics unit, which may not be worse. (Overpayment for absolutely nothing)
About the game. With this processor and GeForce GTX 950, you can play at high graphics settings without problems.
I say this because I myself played on a similar configuration:
CPU AMD Athlone II X4 635 (which may be weaker than yours)
GPU AMD R9 270X (analogous to GTX 950 in performance)
6GB RAM (even less than yours)
As a result, I played at the maximum quality settings, only the tree rendering range was at a high level and the HairWorks technology was turned off. 40 FPS plus or minus 3 FPS. Resolution 1600 * 900. At 1080p, you can safely play at high quality settings and the FPS will not drop below 30.
askimus
I have fps below 22 on the i3-4130, GTS450 and 8 GB of RAM in the most loaded moments. The settings are medium and a couple of high. So it's hardly a matter of iron.
Brannan wrote:
the GTX 660 (30-40 FPS),
the GTX 750ti (30 FPS)
One amendment 750 ti gives just 30-40, contingent, at least because it is an analog of 660, and more than full, in something even slightly bypassing her)))
Roman Medved
You know, amd a10 in general is the same choice, to put it mildly, worthless, for comparison, the price-performance
is yours
http://www.nix.ru/autocatalog/amd/CPU-AMD-A10-5700-AD5700O-34- GHz-4core-SVGA-RADEON-HD-7660D-4-Mb-65W-5-GT-s-Socket-FM2_144301.html # tab = goods_descriptions
here is its analog about the same price, but much faster from the FX series
http: //www.nix.ru/autocatalog/amd/CPU-AMD-FX-4350-FD4350F-42-GHz-4core-4-plus-8Mb-125W-5200-MHz-Socket-AM3-plus_160496.html#tab= goods_descriptions
The fact is that AMD A series processors have a built-in graphics core, which in fact is not needed in figs, but the price of concrete, for the most part, replacing one vidyuhi will not help you, the same percentage needs to be changed because you have it at the level of old cores 2 and even this old man does it without difficulty
http://www.nix.ru/autocatalog/amd/CPU-AMD-FX-8320-FD8320F-35-GHz-8core-8-plus-8Mb-125W-5200- MHz-Socket-AM3-plus_146973.html
Here it is suitable for a comfortable game, oh young people, do not buy ready-made computers in stores, the assemblies there are poor, and even 3 skins will be removed for you, let me guess this camp for 40 thousand?
Brannan wrote: a
graphics block is already built in, which is probably no worse.
No, he is poor there, believe me))) the guy's overpayment is not for the vidyuhu just, but for the A series percentage, instead of him one could put FX
gt 640 22-30 fps (lok) ultra textures, shadows drawing and highworks bottom
Dude, to summarize the above - change the vidyuhu, I think this computer will have 960 pecs the most it will be
Roman Medved wrote:
Now I want to buy a gtx 950 oc 2GB.
Another shit from the 50s series (thrown away money, if talking about games). Already at least 960, or better 970. Or 780Ti is a great card.
Bertenday
I have a GTX 750 ... At maximum speed ... except for shadows (They are at low, because there is no sense), HW Settings (low), Vegetation ranges (High) ... and the rest is at prohibitive in FullHD ... 20- 25 fps ... And if you turn off HW and put Grass on Low, then 30-40 ... so either Crooked hands ... or did not disperse the vidyuhu ... (Count the same thing ...) ... (And I also have a percentage ... AMD FX (tm) -6300 six-core processor 3.5 ... 6 cores)