Which is better: AC or AC2 (Assassin's Creed 2)
Which is better, AC or AC2First you need to play the second and only then compare the two parts, but usually the first part is always interesting the second, for example Gothic :)
I think the second part will be better, judging by the screenshots and videos. We will see.
usually the first part is always interesting the second.
It seems to me not in this case.
Nuuu ...)) comparing AC and AC2 is like comparing a calculator with an iPhone ... of course the calculator is more original ... and the batteries do not need to be changed so often ...
Part 2 is better, of course, motivated by newer graphics, gameplay, and the continuation of the plot.
current for this topic, the creator needs to be banned for a couple of hours to understand that 2 is better! here and the fool understands that it is better! those who launched the beta crack and saw the game at full maximum speed, they will immediately say which is better! I personally put it to the maximum and am happy with the game! all the best is yet to come!
About two years ago, a friend took the AC. Well, I had a lot of lag (Winda)))). Then after a year I put the AU on the new Windows again. Everything ran, jumped and flew at maximum speed. BUT !!! For some reason I didn't like the game. Then, after 6-7 months, after seeing the console AC 2, I decided to go through 1 on a new one. Having passed completely was very happy. Then I thought: take - do not take AC 2 for PSki 3, but changed my mind (expensive for the game). Well, now, if, for some reason, the PC version does not buy it on PS 3, despite the price ... By the way, at 2 it seems the graph is better, it's just that everything is somehow hmm ... Is it green? :)))
The second part is definitely better. The game has become much more varied, there are no annoying tasks. And the plot is more detailed.
The first is better, the atmosphere of the early Middle Ages is cooler than the newfangled x *** from the Renaissance, but as for the additions and improvements, if they were made in the first, it would be three times cooler)
And as for the graph, they generally stupidly added lighting particles like in the imperial total var, when any object begins to independently illuminate everything around, instead of a simple reflection of light. The most complete nonsense, when there is nothing more to add to the graph so that the user's computers begin to slow down) Those who like to play should be bred for an upgrade.
Devion
+1
Yes, for me the Middle Ages and the Crusades, I love this time, besides, the plot for that time is historically justified. The rebirth is not so interesting to me, and it is nonsense. Hashishins (assassins) are precisely the offspring of the Crusades. It is a Muslim radical organization that emerged as a response to the lawlessness of the crusaders in Palestine. And in the second part, for example, even tombs: one assassin is a Mongol, another is an ancient Roman, the third is generally another Egyptian, etc. pfffffff, and who the fuck their corpses were brought to Italy O_o. Would have taught something developed history. Give the atmosphere of the Middle Ages and historical accuracy in 3 parts !!!!!!!!
the second is better !!! There the plot is cool and the gameplay has been improved.
VaRen
Here everything is mainly drawn to graphics! Even though the graphics are not perfect, the main thing is that the plot is interesting!
I like both parts of the game. Although part 1 is boring, but the plot is interesting.