Well? How do you like it? (Battlefield 1)
How do you like the new setting and the huge leap back in the technology of war? For me, there were still not enough bows and arrows to finally meet our expectations, but DICE is not ACTIVISION to torment us - they will still make at least a good gameMan_without_conscience
Handsome! Release of the game at the end of October.
If you have money, buy games that you like.
Note: you need to see Zootopia - a sea of ​​positive, otherwise only cruelty in games.
Spoiler
Most intriguing is the number 1 in the title. The only analogy that comes to my mind is the First World War. Doubt this is due to any restart. I am pleased with the freshness of the idea, besides, it seems for a long time that some studios have wanted to make a shooter in this setting, and since they are doing it, it means that enough ideas have accumulated to present the game to the public. I really hope for success, but I am wary.)
Well, personally, such a step from the side of the developers only causes respect for me. They did not follow the lead of the publishers and decided to experiment, while the same developers of Kalda, under pressure from the publisher, do not want to do this. How else? You never know what, maybe the experiment will fail and very few people will buy the game, otherwise it is better to follow the trodden path. Only the whole joke is that the majority of players like the future, and Activision, like any other publisher, relies on the opinion of the majority, which is logical. Nevertheless, the setting of the First World War is very interesting to me personally, but I perfectly understand that it will introduce a lot of restrictions. Perhaps because of these very limitations, the game's life cycle will be significantly reduced. I can't say for sure, but there are fears. Most of all I am not even attracted by the multiplayer, but by the single. It's even interesting what developers can come up with. Hopefully the company isn't just a dumb set of missions. But while the fact that the gameplay was not really shown is upsetting, but the game and all sorts of packs for it are already being sold. Most likely, we will again be given a stub for 2k, and in order to play a full-fledged game, we will have to buy some kind of premium analogue, which will cost several times more than the game itself. EA has always sinned about it. I don’t know yet whether I will buy or not. We need more information, but I, unlike some, do not give 10 points in absentia to the game and call it a masterpiece, based on only one CG video. But fears that the game will suffer the fate of Battlefront, I still can't leave, because there are all the prerequisites. Just as really funny are the stupid exclamations of the crazy fanatics who rode on their hatred, who still continue to compare the Kalda with the battle, although they became even more different. Apparently these people are incurable.
I wonder what ... Once upon a time, was it a rumor, or did they even have an idea, BF 2143. They also built in BF 4, so to speak, a bridge between BF 4 and BF 2142. BF 4 has test engines from Titan, the first prototypes stepping robots. And then now they cut off everything to hell and go into the 1st world ...
What can be said about the small teaser, nothing. When a full-fledged gameplay video comes out, then you can discuss it.
Andrey Kryuchkoff
Well, we know how DICE works - they have a common scheme: maximum realism, minimum casualness
Khan Viro
wangyu are the same systemic ones as in the hardline, and if the mantle is filmed, then in general, at 280x, it will fly to the fsd.