Well? How do you like it? (Battlefield 1)
How do you like the new setting and the huge leap back in the technology of war? For me, there were still not enough bows and arrows to finally meet our expectations, but DICE is not ACTIVISION to torment us - they will still make at least a good gameRusik
So, probably, it's time for you to tie up with games, it's not about games (if you're tired of everything in shooters) ...
The trailer does not show the game, but advertises.
The main task of the trailer is just to evoke that very desire - to buy.
Do not expect the truth in games, especially from foreign publishers. They rewrite history as they want.
Han Viro
At high, without any performance-consuming options will go.
I even had Battlefront at 50 fps at minimum and 30 at high
deIIis
well, with such fanaticism as at 15-17 years old, I can no longer play, but in battle 4 I am not satisfied with a lot of things either. bf1 hit me precisely because the game will be about World 1, all this modernity and games about the future with blasters is already up to the neck
Rusik
DooM suits ...
I would pre-order, especially in the appendage + 1 game-Wolf last, but so far I have no money - a crisis.
Spoiler
This is a big victory for Batla over Cal, just a huge one needs to wait for the gameplay
For the first time since the release of Battlefield 3, I will not take Battle at the start. This is really some kind of Battlefront: (I don't even need Battlefront for nothing (they wanted to give me a version for PS4, I refused). And from the point of view of morality, DICE went this way (the path of World Wars) in vain, when there were rumors I thought it was a rather slippery slope and an insult for those whose grandparents went through this Hell. These are the Balagan guys. You either do it realistically (only a few will buy the game) or arrange a show (there is a chance of a ban in some countries or there will be a scandal and discontent) I'm not interested in either the First or the Second World War.ps.correctly on NeoGAF people wrote about Battlefield 1.
GeRRLord
By November, but I think it will be postponed to next year.
Although, let's not guess.
Khan Viro
Agha. If everyone had such "buckets", then there would be no need for DICE to create frostbite that goes even on microwaves
deIIis
deIIis wrote:
By November, but I think it will be postponed to next year.
will not transfer. this is the main title of the studio. Star Wars, however, managed to do, and released without any problems. and this will be done. The specialist pulled the announcement to the last, so that it was definitely without hyphenation, and the exact date was given right away: the game is almost ready - it will be allowed to play in June.
meagarry
COD when it comes out ... Otherwise
they will collide with their heads again)
deIIis
deIIis wrote:
And then they will face each other again)
different audience.
meagarry
Agree.
COD is mostly console players.
The future, all the cases, give them, so that they look spectacular on the tivi of the large diagonal.
Who else, but I do not like the theme of the 1st World War and the atmosphere of that time ... (As well as the theme of futuristic wars). It was 100 years ago. None of the participants are already dead. This era is long in the past and it is difficult to understand it. Ugly uniforms, primitive firearms, farting maize and scary hulking coffins on caterpillars - all this is not at all attractive.
I think with the right balance and approximate historical accuracy, the game will turn out great.