The hobbit
Accidentally came across this message http://www.kinopoisk.ru/level/1/film/278522/ Interesting, isn't it? And who else knows and can say anything about this?Well, Frodo they had a kind of leader, so in any case Saruman and Grimma would have been released.
in any case?))) in any case, Frodo wanted to let go of the second one, but only his order did not work and 3 arrows stuck into that one at once =) so this is our case for you =)
Now let's sabzh
In the book The Hobbit Gandalf is about 50 years younger than in the sun. Therefore, the actor who played G in The Overlord must look a little younger. This is a dilemma. It would be better if they first filmed the hobbit. For me personally, if another actor plays, this film will immediately go into the category of not very expected.
Yet. In the book, Bilbo was about 55 years old. According to the logic of things, an adult, wise actor for years should play in the film, but in VS Frodo also does not shine with gray hair, even though he is also over fifty (according to the book, it is true that they say that the hobbits look younger than their years, but not so much!)
And more - Film genre
The book "Sun" is a rather dark, but still a fairy tale, with its funny episodes and joyful inserts.
The film is dark and dark, hopeless and bleak.
But it would be cool if the Hobbit was "tuned" in the same way.
should look a little bit younger
Has everyone forgotten that Gandalf is Maya ?? !! He is immortal! He has been living for unknown years! From the Primordial Era! For him, 50 years more or less is a trifle ... For someone who smokes the sky for the third ten thousand years ...
in the sun, Frodo also does not shine with gray hair, even though he is also over fifty
Heh ... VK begins with Frodo's birthday ( and Bilbo ...). Forgot? He was only 33 years old ...
Mithrandir has already come to this world as an old man (by the will of Iluvatar, apparently), just like Saruman, so nifiga he does not need to grow younger.
People, I have 2 questions:
1) How did Saruman die according to the book, but how according to the director's version?
2) Somewhere here they wrote about Gandalf's staff, about his future fate. What kind of staff were you talking about? ...
1) How did Saruman die according to the book, and how according to the director's version?
According to the book, he was killed by Rottongue, in The Hobbitania (Shire), by cutting his throat with a knife. There was no corpse left, for the body turned into smoke ... In the director's version of the film, Rottongue pushed him against Orthank ...
2) Somewhere here they wrote about Gandalf's staff, about his future fate. What kind of staff were you talking about? ... The
staff with which Gandalf began the Guardians' campaign, disappeared, sank into the Mori Abyss ... This is according to the book and from the film. And where he got the new staff, neither the book says, nor is it visible from the film ... Galadriel gave out, apparently, a new one in Lorien ... Moreover, to match the change of name (there was Gandalf the Gray, became Gandalf the White) she gave out a white staff, with graceful carving. He walked with him until the end of the book / film, and when he sailed to Overseas (Valinor), the staff was with him ...
PS Just watched the film again. Mlyn, I completely forgot that from the top of Orthanka Gandalf fled (riding an eagle - remember?) Also without a staff. And at the advice of Elrond, he again appeared with him ... Apparently, he has a solid stock of staffs ... Hidden in all the villages of Middle-earth ...
haha your dead
I know =) and what does it mean?)
Well, why did they stick into it?
Well Del Toro makes an excellent entertaining movie for "visuals". And you don't have to worry about the direction - even though the style of the book is childish, but the events there are not sour unfolding and you can shoot them oh-ho-ho. The same massacre of three armies under the mountain or how the dragon burned the water city, and the Dark Forest is worth something ..
massacre of three armies under the mountain
If you mean the Battle of the Five Armies (or Armies), then it was exactly 5 (!) armies - people, gnomes, goblins, eagles and wargs ...
5 is even better!
PS
Apparently as a child I was a terrible racist and did not even remember the army of eagles and wargs ..
News!
Peter Jackson Begins Writing The Hobbit
Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh and Philip Boyens have just signed a contract to write the screenplay for Guillermo Del Toro's The Hobbit.
The same trio are known to have been responsible for the scripts of The Lord of the Rings trilogy, and their work for the final installment of Tolkien's film adaptation, The Return of the King, was awarded an Oscar for Best Adaptation. Now, a few months after it became known that Del Toro will become the director of the future tape, the above-named trio will finally officially start writing the film version of The Hobbit. Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh also executive produced the film.
As expected, "The Hobbit" will be in two parts, and both Del Toro is going to shoot at the same time, as Jackson did. The first episode will tell about the adventures of young Bilbo Baggins and Gandalf, while the second will cover the 60-year period between the events of The Hobbit and The Fellowship of the Ring.
The Hobbit dilogy will begin production next year. The films will be released in 2011 and 2012, respectively.
for more details see http://www.kinopoisk.ru/level/2/news/796119/
Yeah ... For a long time the Lord of the Rings trilogy lay at home, I was too lazy to read, I thought it was not interesting. Recently I read, books are awesome, but I have not watched any films, nor have I read the Hobbit with some other book with a complex title. It's a pity...
A book with a complicated title - is it Salmarion? Even if you really want it, it is very difficult to read it, I never mastered it.
The Hobbit, on the other hand, is very easy to read, because it is written like a children's fairy tale, and not as voluminous as The Lord of the Rings.