Trilogy Impressions (Grand Theft Auto: The Trilogy)

GTAman
But this is not so.
Why not? A bunch of flaws and "features" from the mobile version clearly speak of this. And the graphics are different due to a different engine.

I don't know, maybe I'm such a shit ... but I got a trilogy.
Not to say that everything is perfect, but in the absence of other versions. Prior to this, the last time was SA on PS3, here there is really a mobile port with poor resolution. The only thing that the achievements were delivered, and here, although clumsy cartoon faces and animation curves, the drawing is not bad, the effects seem to be snobby. Not for its price tag, of course, but ...
You can look at blizzard, who raised permission in 1st Starcraft and sell it

I'd rather wait a couple of months for the fans to make mods for this remaster.

GTAman wrote:
But this is not so. Nobody said about mobile versions that they have "plasticine graphics", which is natural, because there is a different level of processing. In addition, the totality of what we end up with somehow fits into the term "remaster".
When I run GTA: Liberty City Stories on the PCSX2 emulator and using the emulator, I improve the picture, enable wide screen support and increase the resolution, make a shortcut on the desktop that immediately launches the game in the emulator so that you won't even guess that some emulator is working at all - this does not mean that I or the PCSX2 developers made a remaster of LCS.
If, before selling a car, I blow out rusty thresholds with polyurethane foam and paint over it, pour sealant into a leaky radiator, and anti-knock into the engine, can this be called a repair? Or more like a short-term hiding of defects, i.e. fraud?
If crooked macaques with the help of automation, practically without any quality control, stretch textures and models, and make primitive crutches so that the old mobile version AT LEAST SOMETHING displays a picture through the new graphics engine (without even having to understand how the engine works normally) - is it a remaster? Judging by the publication of the gameplay in the form of gifs, and not a normal full-fledged video, they perfectly understood what they did, so this is purely a scam with concealing obvious defects.

Here I see the reviews about the game and I understand that people got drunk, before any pixel garbage they were happy, but now the cartoon graphics and everyone started to cock, AE 4 was done because Rage is difficult to port to android and aios
I personally don’t care about the graphics, the main thing is that the game is interesting
. gta interesting all three, well, only gta 3 did not go straight in
But everything and sa very much even

Lover of games
Because there are a lot of bugs and cut things compared to the original, very hack work, especially on a pc. And the interestingness is the merit of the game itself, not the remasters.

GTAman wrote:
This is bad, but what is the connection with the price tag of the remaster? If the originals were left, would the remaster's price be acceptable?
Xs, maybe. As the owner says, some of them sell the same daub on the NFT exchange, no one died from this, and the costs must somehow be recouped. If in the stores it was possible to buy the original version for the same price, the players would not have booted so much. And it turned out that the old affordable (and high-quality) offer was taken and replaced with a game product identical to the natural one (exaggerate) in a bright cover at a completely new price. So there was a conflict between supply and demand, in the absence of a choice, you somehow start to study more critically what they put on the counter, weighing the price / quality ratio.