strange work of the computer in games

Givemethedust
for the gifted. if he saw higher performance in the sledsplay (due to the fact that the frame limit is higher on high-speed monitors), then why the fuck should he have the same frame rate?

Givemethedust
vsink enabled = number of frames is limited by monica (75Hz = 75fps, 60Hz =
60fps ) vsink disabled = number of frames is not limited
so is it clearer?
another question: is the top-starter vsink enabled? if yes = turn off, if no = dig further.

theoretical fps from under the program has nothing to do with
the V-sung matrix ; in turn, it does not imply cutting for the hertzon of the monitor, although most often it will work that way.
So for example, I have a 50Hz screen on it, it will be 50 fps with hundreds of fps,
here the example is not very clear because the fps is high. Now, if there was such a thing that pedmak 3 gives out 30-40fps on ultras, and for some reason I have 25-30. then there was a good topic for thinking and searching for problems.
For example, I know perfectly well why I manage to sweat 690 at low resolution - and the patamu that I have in my firewood is forced af16 forced smoothing of alpha textures x8. the quality of the mip map is maximum. shading of background lighting (shbao) is maximum. therefore, in my zhta 5 where moose run fps, if the engine is accelerating and dusting on the machine on ultras, around anti-aliasing and textures, it will go up to 46, and in pedmak 3 there will be slightly less fps than in the gamma gamma test and, accordingly, it will be under 50 fps on my pitch resolution, but here already rather a processor.
often cunning pitch bakers to show that they have a lot of fps, I force the anisotropy of x8 or 4 and the mip map to low. from which all sorts of buckets that have few graphonoblocks sometimes seem to be 5-10 maybe more than on the ultra-ultra ultrasounds of the drivers.
he himself threw on a radeon a couple of sonnets of parrots.
therefore, trust tests and personal performance with a large percentage of statistical spread and a high error of high fps.
and the textures there are blinking is another story. Recently, the firewood campaign has become sick. here.

pekabir
for the gifted. if he saw higher performance in the sledge


let-play (due to the fact that the frame limit is higher on high-speed monitors) then why the fuck should he have the same frame rate?
Do you even understand what happens? He says "my game works worse", and you say: "don't care, you have a 60 Hz monitor and you can't see more than 60 frames." I don’t understand in any way why you associate refresh rate and performance? Do not care how many frames per second he sees, if what matters is how many frames the game produces. In this case, this is what matters.

pekabir
understand you that my vert synchronization is turned off in some games
and therefore it will be more than 60 frames. I want to understand why I have less FPS in many games than others!
why far cry 4 slows down for me, even without anti-aliasing, why Fallout 3 new vegas, Deus Ex Human Revolution, which my computer should click like nuts, freeze every few minutes. and here I do not understand the synchronization. ??? cons to put this the simplest, and accuse me of being a freak who has no place on the screw, that I have a bunch of viruses, or that I do not know what a BIOS is and I don’t guess that the frequency of the RAM may not be 1600, but much less. look carefully at the picture above.
Givemethedust Thanks for your understanding .....

Mass Effect87
Understand that I have vert sync turned off in some games
and therefore will be more than 60 frames,
so you have all sorts of shit going on.
Or am I explaining painfully complicated things here?

Mass Effect87
please tell me what program that you have in the game shows the temperature and fps

I look at the Genom94 temperature in aida 64, or msi Afterburner. fps look at riva runer, sometimes Fraps

pekabir
Okay .... look where the settings are fatter,

I don't think that my 970 msi gaming can be much worse than 970 ichill to play 20 frames at the same settings! exactly one to one as in the video, I set the settings. removed all programs from startup, set a high priority in the task manager, then overclocked the percentage from 3.5 to 4 gigahertz, raised the frequencies of the video, decreased the frequency of the video, I did not notice the difference,
and sometimes my igruha was up to 30, I was just in awe that you do you say that?

We must try with a new video card, maybe a defective one was caught

as soon as the day off, I'll try to record my video if you don't believe me ..

maiak
wherever you can get it .... you will probably have to take it to the service center. I took in the citylink in St. Petersburg.

Mass Effect87
I had no drawdowns even 660 years ago.
"additional boot parameters" from msconfig screen

pekabir

curve build windows, 100 years without defragmentation and driver updates

SP-minus
interesting and how did you define it .....?
Windows is not an assembly. by updating drivers, what do you mean? update the network card drava or what))?

Mass Effect87 can you
guess, or suggest what your problem is?

LOL! Locked the system on ONE core!

pekabir
not everything is as it seems ...
no difference! it won't if I put one or 4. This misconception does not affect performance in any way. it can only increase the Windows load. but since I have ssd, I will not see the difference
and I checked it, it gives absolutely nothing.

Mass Effect87
you should have 8 set there, or auto! it's not clear why the fuck are you trying to change the number of threads

pekabir
well and where should I have 8 ??? I have an i5 4690k .... 4 cores 4 threads. I did not change anything there. and so it was .. and removed the tick and changed the number. absolutely nothing