PC Performance (Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales)
Well, gentlemen? The time has come. We share the performance on your PC. Is the game better optimized than the previous part?Performance is great! Optimization at the level of Marvels spider man. There are no freezes as it was in the last part. Comp in the photo
Yes, everything is fine, the graphon is top, Miles just hovers like a feather, but I'm not a fan of spiders, so if when there's nothing to play at all then, otherwise the game is perfectly implemented on a PC.
Another game in which I encounter poor support for amd processors. Not all threads are involved, because of this, the video card is not loaded and, accordingly, low fps. The last part has the same problem. It's the same in Cyberpunk, but there enthusiasts released an AMD SMT patch, due to which the percentage began to work at full capacity and the FPS increased by 30%. I don't understand how to get rid of this problem. Changing the percentage is not an option.
Ryzen7 3700x and RTX 3080
Elanu
Notebook msi proc i5 10400h card 3050ti 4gb 16gb ram
On average it goes to 35-60 frames. I don't turn on the rays.
Detektor1989
You with such iron will be downvoted wildly right now, here most of the systems of the "homeless" level
Elanu wrote:
Another game where I'm having poor amd support. Not all threads are involved, because of this, the video card is not loaded and, accordingly, low fps.
strange, on my old i7-5960x with 6900xt everything is good in principle
Palych Rokov
Well, Intel is not AMD) It is with AMD processors that the problem is (specifically with Ryzen), and I'm not the only one like that. Many are lucky, no problems. And most importantly, neither changing Windows nor firewood changes anything. Only patches correct.
Elanu
Similar problem. The last spider was on ultras, on this I even cough up 32 FPS on average. Proc from AMD, Ryzen 5 2600
The 100fps going along the blade
shows 5600x + 6700xt! So your cheap motherboard in 450 does not take out 5600.
Walking on the blade
Lord, what kind of people did they go .... A lot of minuses were set .... Just because they saw the actual iron in the profile, and nothing more. If I wrote the configuration by hand, they would not believe it, and they would also set minuses. You won't please.
X_ray_83
Not a fact, b450s are also different, my tomahawk works quite well with 5800x
ZoomLion
So if you mindlessly upgrade, the feeder will burn out, because it seems to trot it, because 100fps in this game on ultras without rays!
and I again have 5 fps, as in part 1, he doesn’t see the map again, more precisely, he sees it, but from 5% to 20% it works, you have to go into a hard game and only then it’s normal but still doesn’t work at 99%. (as in 1 parts they are for laptops didn’t release anything, and in DLS b = the same problems)
Detektor1989
so what was the point of you laying out your configuration if you have it the most up-to-date, and at the same time saying that everything flies? the ash stump will be downvoted, because nobody cares that everything flies on top-end hardware, so if you posted the 2012 config and would have shown 60fps on ultras, then everyone would be surprised.