Capture the whole world (Rome: Total War)
Has anyone tried to capture all 100 of the provinces on the highest difficulty level and hold for a few moves, and then take Rome?I igras for the house of Julii, and were built only for the Praetorian cavalry and catapults (if possible)
8-10 cavalry units and 4-5 catapults the total number of about 700 people and was able to take out 3-4 of the enemy's army of thousands and a half each!
four cavalry on the flanks, built by wedge and catapults in the center shoot fire at will when enemy comes he is already pretty broken, and then distributed cavalry troops at the enemy and almost immediately after this simultaneous swoop, the enemy is running, catch up and finish off. Managed to kill Brutus 1400 and lose at least 70 units.
To take the city voobzhe simple: find which side is easier vniknut square critcism by
catapults punched a hole or two and throw the cavalry into the square trying not to pay attention to the enemy, grab the area of the reserve there 1 squad and throw the rest of the cavalry troops coming to the area and all.
to defend the city even easier if there are 5-6 riders place them in the square and waiting for the enemy, when it comes with nakoku the volume for the game with practically no losses (more than 1 just does not fit in the corridor on the way to the square) and all the enemy is defeated. Gourmets may be advisable to put archers on the walls, but without it everything is OK.
If someone managed to take over the world one way please write how.
Thank you.
Have of Scipio seems too often uprising to happen in the African provinces. Or just me so lucky?))
AriX17 & Tribun
Yes, Spain(especially Korduba), and Jerusalem is really a pain in the f...
Miserable distant city I after the destruction of the faction you give the rebel.
Still these cities are unprofitable, although there is the illusion that they are profitable due to low population.
Egipetskie city I captured, still do not hold. But to cut the people I opposed.
And Jerusalem is a fact... shit town
Hurray, the forum is alive!!!!!!!!
Turbo Pascal
And to cut the people I opposed.
Yes, it is a pity to kill people, but often the only solution.
I think the one who carves the population of their own Empire, shows the inconsistency as a player STRATEGY.
It cuts the roots of the idea of the beautiful game.
If the game is seen only as deftly control the units on the tactical map, you have to play Cossacks.
I also captured seleucide all cards, but it is in the original. The population was cut only from the barbarians. And constantly transferred capital to the center. As a result, all beneath me and leaves a message like I got all I know of the it world.d.
Turbo Pascal
If the game is seen only as deftly control the units on the tactical map, you have to play Cossacks.
I play them!
I think the one who carves the population of their own Empire, shows the inconsistency as a player STRATEGY.
So what to do? If you just capture a city, it will revolt constantly.
When the city was captured, it's always been that like. The capture is not a sin to cut a little people, troops for trophies, went on a war of conquest. But then when the town is part of the Empire, to cut the population - wrong.
After all, given the goal of 50 provinces, and not the whole world. That is to capture 50 provinces and to create a prosperous and peaceful Empire, that's the mission! If the whole world, is not obtained.
Cossack at me on the desktop. Every six months I put 7 opponents, the higher the complexity, money, money, money and cut the whole world))
maybe if and buzz that create the core of the Empire with a thriving Central provinces, and the periphery to use as a source of income, is constantly cutting out there active (provoking rebellion). although this smacks of something unhealthy))
Of course, to exterminate the population is not good, but it is the fault of the developers, that's a given.
Now try to do it playing as Scythia....if you capture the same Stay or Arsakio quite real (in the sense of not facing rebellions every year), here in Africa has been - here for it and have serious concerns.
There are 101 or 102 Provincie
and all that is in the North-East violent (yellow face)
and in the East(almost red))
I solved this problem radically, to cut the population it really is not morality. So I added to the temples of the level of happiness. Pantheon does not give 50% and 150%. Since the improvement affects all the factions, only better.
Cheaters on the soap;)
Clear the grove of joy to add. But the Pantheon!
And Fig need the whole world? Need a little crazy to be, probably, to once again capture Femicare and Tara.
I'm new here friends!
Naschet capture the whole world! I'm here for the Kingdom of Pontus. Year 169 BC, the Difficulty of VH/VH! Asia minor, Mesopotamia, two of Armenia and Egypt, the Balkans are mine. Continue to play uninteresting.
And in the beginning cada fought back from Egypt, Parthia and the Seleucids, was horror as inter!
You talked about 100 cities, and I have 30 neinteresno. Where is the patience?
When the city was captured, it's always been that like. The capture is not a sin to cut a little people, troops for trophies, went on a war of conquest. But then when the town is part of the Empire, to cut the population - wrong.
When the city part of the Empire, rarely cut people, when he's rebellious - cut all in a row. About the suppression of the uprising read :) the Rebellious city the same as the rebels that are on the highways and kosyachat all trade.
The whole world is conquered for Egypt.
Their
I identity for Egypt))
Mirmilon
The interest is there, when you have someone to fight! If you play in the East, after its complete takeover of Rome except there is no longer anyone! Now, if there is still megaceryle showed up, or the Spaniards of God under the tail hit, Yes! And so banal avalanche kepadaku any army of Rome is censured. I started 5 times for Slavkov, came to Greece and Sicily and scored.