3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
s
stalker7162534 14.12.19 04:18 am

Fools love to swarm.

Leonid Filatov's a wonderful actor. A lot of great roles. But the one remembered most.
Though to criticize the film, criticize and sensibly - say could not, could never, happen this in the USSR. to the Prosecutor and the prisoner lived in a communal apartment. But art is not a reflection of reality, in addition to reflect the reality of art encompasses more and more. So the fact that the film just used a metaphor in order to bring together - for dialogue - something that nezavisimo.

Leonid Filatov in the movie "the life of the chief of criminal investigation Department".
listen to the song Okudzhava performed by the magnificent Filatov.

just a minute and a half.

And now for srach. What can you tell about the observable fools gathered in a pack? Speak about a pack of fools to enrage.
Spoilers load of the subject - that annoying fools who rushed EN masse to use the fashionable buzzwords.
131 Comments
Sort by:
R
Ryazancev 14.12.19

Gauguin
Guys you need to pravoslavi forum.
Spoiler

P
Pilat. 14.12.19

fierce bulletineditor

z
zdrastE 14.12.19

Gauguin
Gauguin wrote:
Let's either no abstractions or explanations.
dude, same thing I tried to achieve you, he didn't... and I just got tired of it.
Sspoilersite about higher morality and absolute morality good on a full stomach, sitting in a comfortable bureaucratic Deputy chair and having the account with a nice number of zeros anywhere in London. then, of course, possible to speculate about morality for the sake of morality.
and for the others whom you consider degenerates (including his parents and himself along with them), such arguments are harmful and dangerous. a threat though, because surviving person needs to think about its very survival and the survival of people close to him, all other thoughts will only distract and give false targets.
it is enough for you really?

C
ColonelJason 14.12.19

Nevoeiro
Nevoeiro wrote:
But for most people, fool the one who thinks differently,isn't it?
Most people are not retarded enough to be able to be specific in their judgments.It is clear that the fool thought differently,and down, and retard, but most have enough brains to understand that he myslelf not just different, but wrong. This clarification forms the semantic load of the word fool.
vftor
vftor wrote:
But ColonelJason believes that the word fool comes from the adjective bad
ColonelJason doesn't want to expose themselves to ridicule by releasing their counting with regards to the origin of the word, it just informs others of what is written in the etymological dictionary.
stalker7162534
stalker7162534 wrote:
And notice it's inherent from birth, regardless of the fact that investing in human parents and society.
You are now a little surprised, but everything is given to you birth, was formed in an evolutionary way, and laid down in your genes. The concept of good andevil the mechanisms necessary for survival of the species. To understand the obviousness of this fact (which is true), is sufficient to recognize for example the fact that these concepts are very different in different ages , and different Nations, i.e., was performing a purely utilitarian function of social control. Yes, and for individual human life, morality is very variable. It is bad to kill people? Of course. Bad to kill people who attack you?No, everything is OK. Morality, PF..

N
Nevoeiro 14.12.19

vftor
well, you do the same yourself and denied) who said YOU choicesa so you or scientists,they can't be wrong ,there's a chance?
there are no fools among the people,and if you compare with the animals it is another question.
And your Coffey,nonsense)

N
Nevoeiro 14.12.19

ColonelJason
Most people are not retarded enough to be able to be specific in their judgments.It is clear that the fool thought differently,and down, and retard, but most have enough brains to understand that he myslelf not just different, but wrong. This clarification forms the semantic load of the word fool.
One side and the other?

C
ColonelJason 14.12.19

Nevoeiro
I don't see any sides in the fact that words have meanings and they regulate the dealings with in the dictionary.

N
Nevoeiro 14.12.19

ColonelJason
agree spazz or a retard of myslet not original,but not the same essence,they are another you differently,and options?
fantasts and storytellers not,then they are fools or those visionaries?
the thing is that the fool made the mistake of knowing that to do so is impossible,but with another reversal under what conditions?
No one not a fool,but he was not smarter than animals!

N
Nevoeiro 14.12.19

ColonelJason
words their meanings change,but not in this case.

C
ColonelJason 14.12.19

Nevoeiro wrote:
agree spazz or a retard of myslet not original
What do you mean I agree? I did not say that. Downs and oligophrenic very original thought.
Nevoeiro wrote:
fantasts and storytellers not,then they are fools or those visionaries?
the thing is that the fool made the mistake of knowing that to do so is impossible,but with another reversal under what conditions?
I don't understand this set of words.
Nevoeiro wrote:
No one not a fool,but he was not smarter than animals!
News: man is an animal. Do you have education of some kind?
Nevoeiro wrote:
words their meanings change,but not in this case.
In General, it is the constancy of the meaning of the existence of civilizations. Change your meaning of the word very occasionally and through a long transformation processes and not due to the fact that in their ignorance people misuse the word on the forum.

G
Gauguin 14.12.19

Hello
I already told you that the moral debt depends on the circumstances and its violation is equally disgusting as the oligarch and the poor. In degenerates is the same idea of morality is based on the utility, circumstances, survival and depends on the conditions. Actually, that's why is now so popular utilitarian and evolutionary moral theory.

C
ColonelJason 14.12.19

Gauguin
Tell please, and that requires true morality in a situation kill or be killed?

A
A.Soldier of Light 14.12.19

ColonelJason wrote:
Tell please, and that requires true morality in a situation kill or be killed?
Answer: to die. A higher morality does not imply any violence against anyone. But if there is a third answer to the question, it's run or to defend himself without violence to the attacker (turn fantasy, in short).
Hello wrote:
you read the even know how close to the end, something besides his scribbling?
The question you have asked myself actually, because your post is not, it is in the style of the old man grumbles something unintelligible -)
In the case you told nothing, except a sharp negation (garbage), it's the only thing that was clear. Well, to argue you're not very cool, but sorry )
stalker7162534 wrote:
so morality, good, inherent in the person initially.
That is what I see. Erase the human memory, so he remembered nothing, and it would still be as if by instinct to assess any incident with the filing of its genuine morality, which cannot be erased. Because we can act differently, ignore etc, but do not fool yourself, the man himself knows, if I analyze my feelings, feelings that he feels, looking at a particular event, act.
nagibator666RUS wrote:
people by nature will always stray into the flock, tribe, community, country, state, nation.
There is nothing wrong what you meant. Where and what is wrong with that - a mystery. Help to solve it? 8)
Gauguin
But repentance must be sincere, and unfortunately, only the penitent knows precisely how genuine it is...
Gauguin wrote:
In degenerates is the same idea of morality is based on the utility, circumstances, survival and depends on the conditions. Actually, that's why is now so popular utilitarian and evolutionary moral theory.
Now whether? Materialists and evolutionists in the past. Well, how else to explain the morality, if you move away from the concepts of God and soul? Evolution! =]
Ryazancev
Why just there? ) Morality does not depend on religions, morality was in the Soviet atheistic society...

R
Ryazancev 14.12.19

A. Soldier of Light
As I'm away for a devout friend and his even more devout wife opened her mouth. I decided to logically think about the commandments and teachings of Christ. Wife said that I am talking heresy and immediately betrayed me anathema. You simply there is not enough authoritative Priest for discussion, he quickly will tell the XY. They all clearly on the tenets. I was just a word that says Gauguin.
Spoiler
Well, not scientific! Where experiments with evidence.
Spoiler

P
Pilat. 14.12.19

I see this topic causes them to stick together))

A
A.Soldier of Light 14.12.19

Ryazancev wrote:
As I'm away for a devout friend and his even more devout wife opened her mouth. I decided to logically think about the commandments and teachings of Christ. Wife said that I am talking heresy and immediately betrayed me anathema.
Must have been funny to watch like 8) it is Easy to imagine. And it's not about us, although I can only speak for myself, let comrade Gaugin he will give their opinion )
Yes, in your example of bigotry from the religious believer. A sad spectacle. We it do not need any priests are not required )

N
Nevoeiro 14.12.19

ColonelJason
many words, few deeds!,don't understand so tupen! your Logica.
not understand so ask.
AHA VONO THAT UNDERSTANDS CIVILIZACIJU))))

N
Nevoeiro 14.12.19

A. Soldier of Light
WHY IS THAT FUNNY?

C
ColonelJason 14.12.19

Nevoeiro
Nevoeiro wrote:
many words, few deeds!,don't understand so tupen! your Logica.
not understand so ask.
AHA VONO THAT UNDERSTANDS CIVILIZACIJU))))
I understand that Russian is not your native language?

N
Nevoeiro 14.12.19

A. Soldier of Light
do not you think that we're obsolete?I'm bored of one and you?