Left 4 Dead vs Left 4 Dead 2 (Left 4 Dead 2)
Actually the title theme is seen. I myself am in left 4 deadDj Vova[RUS], you're the proverbial sheep. Campaign I Hate Mountains is NOT official. In this, it's no sequel.
I am for the first part - it is somehow calm, and even scary to play beginners, while the second part has no atmosphere, there is only the gun. Tsvetotype890 we go cook not who is cooler and who is better. left 4 dead 2 may be steeper, but left 4 dead has its advantages which are not present in left 4 dead 2.
communist10. ...better graphics... no, it is the same in both is source, + in part 1 a lot of fog in part 2 of his never seen.
Joxer. Significantly updated, it shows What? water + guts does not make the graphics a little better.
TWIST love l4d, lighting, surface gloss and sound system. As well as bugs on older graphics cards (commercials, 2004-2005х years).
Shephаrd, you're right, but left 4 dead doesn't go (full graphics) on the graphics card 2005х years. even on my 9800 gtx sometimes lags. And left 4 dead 2 is running smoothly(for some reason) but when you play left 4 dead 2 that much RAM is because of the Gore etc ... (in gambling read )
For me both parts are equal,the first part was like new,and the second is supplemented with new chips.
Yes, and the second is not imbued with this atmosphere as the first part.
PS: In the second part, also updated the water. Just remembered.
I personally believe the second part of the addon first.
First out is better, and secondly, more weapons and mobs + new maps and the Persians.
My vote for first. Although the second too ))
Also in the second more bosses, but in 1 the story more serious and more realistic. so part 2 will be weaker!
The plot? Hmm... it seemed to Me that it is non-existent in Left 4 Dead, as in the second part.
Are you saying that in the game there is no plot? Are you crazy, in both parts, all campaign story-related.
Tell me does it make sense to take the 1st part with the 2nd and cancrena they use different?