DozoRRR
finally looks implausible. GTA with i7 [email protected] litate have at least 80 fps on ultra.
DozoRRR
to Ousterhout Nada 2 limit maps in a minimal resolution.
sale in Minya on FXE where the grass uh 40-50fps in 1600x1200
MunchkiN 616
not only that, you have not replaced their гтх690 the bottom AMD on Intel so you have more and Monique square?the guy you're crazy!what is the meaning of this system?vseravno that the tires of the Jaguar to put on the Cossack,or Vice versa,and roll around town on this
p.s. by the way MB do you know how can I solve the problem?playing world of Warcraft and the best custom resolution is 1440х1080 square as soon as you try to create a 1600x1200 or above-all kind of rules without mistakes,but myltse the myltse,I play in a square format with a higher resolution and teksturki?this bun dsr in any does not want to multiply 2-3-4 times square resolution,they seemsonly FullHD
W3aMisterWinner
the map then Yes, Nimoy at this resolution with this CPU raskryvaetsja. only in rare games like GTA but there is not enough memory so posuti card is the weak point.
at the expense of AMD I was nesovsem rights. I voschem was a bug of the chipset or memory controller from what it started to run slowly and I had to disperse and to disperse the bus. so in principle it works just the same dragon HS the Inquisitor passed on the ultra 50-60fps with occasional slowdowns due to the graphics card. in principle I think this a good idea given that peck was taken not to Igor.
at Intel, I began to go bad but how long the case will take. and expensive much.
if you have full CD you by and large can't do 1200 in height. this requires a multiple of 2 or a multiple of the monitor for acceptable quality stretching.
and available 4к3 you should have something like 1280x960. specifically, in the example of this game and adaptation are multiple solutions to a widescreen format, I haven't checked but sdrv this case should be put to the aforesaid resolution. however, I these functions do not test. and any smoothing posuti makes soap. the SDR itself depends on NVIDIA fire wood and if you do not see all sorts of 100500х4000 Warcraft neither supports SDR. or if the game fundamentally does not see the resolution, play in window th. look for a way to drive the desired.
I like that shoved in 1600x1200 1920x1080 in order to make screenshots but then I needed VGA and switch. Yes, and then repeat the couple failed.
MunchkiN 616
Warcraft 3 supports 4K resolution,it looks very nice then,but stretched and incorrect( you need the square anyway.And I play in a custom resolution 1440х1080 very personal,I don't know why when setting custom 1600x1200 goes myltse( well, okay not a problem,I can not see a square dsr( MB add in the future the option to increase any resolution in the x2-X3-x4,and not just native
W3aMisterWinner
SDR and should evaluate any solution in n-times. and you can't set 1600x1200 because the SDR is going from 800x600 Lule squeezed and stretched.
stretching and getting large or compressed visual image is a different problem to me until she had engaged poskolku games don't support anyway 4к3 I don't know.
http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/the-witcher-3-wild-hunt-hearts-of-stone-test-gpu.html
And here is domination over everything else i7)i5 was specifically here even poslabzhe than Biserka( although in any case fpsu excess. But these hangpu tests are always different,and different scenes sometimes measured even if 1 game with different patches,and always they results vary greatly(depending on version)
W3aMisterWinner
FX strange thing, every year 83хх more urgent and urgent...
Let's see what Folaut 4 show she refuses to i3 start or will go into 2 streams
SUSUL1
well, the crust of the fifth they will catch up and MB even surpass...But i7 is out of reach)as practice shows, even fx at 4.7 GHz can't catch up to 2600 in stock)hehe
W3aMisterWinner
Well, two years ago it confidently shouting that AMD shit, and what better to take than i3 8320=)
And we must pay tribute, Intel with its annual improvement of 5-10% gained up to 30-40% performance compared to the same Sundy and even more relative to the i-7хх against FX and exhibited. While AMD does not have its own factories and has to wait for the transition to a smaller process technology factories, third-party Intel rivet every year for a new model...
We will look at Zen, they come up there. Because unlike Intel, they love the bullshit experiment.
That's just the marketing they have shitty...
Their APU's for example would have to beat Intel in the segment of notebooks (set of characteristics they do not exceed frail classmate from the blue) but the people conducted brand Intel
SUSUL1
Well, two years ago it confidently shouting that AMD shit, and what better to take than i3 8320=)
it was,Carl!because i3 was given(and throws in most games)more fps.
We will look at Zen, they come up there. Because unlike Intel, they love the bullshit experiment.
I want to see Zen)if OFC will MB even svinetice,but as practice shows,if AMD rolls out a competitive product,and the price it will be at the level of the top of the competitor( amd fury evident confirmation.T.e. AMD rolled out the good cards and pulled up horse price.And so-what profitsee to take 980тай for the same price+he overclocked will be more powerful than 15-20% than the red which are not looking
W3aMisterWinner
The high price at the start of the high segment is fine, but scorer on the top-end solutions start middle and lower office segment.. And here the price battle will unfold.
Thanks to its leading position I7 today, Intel holds the high prices of i3 and i5. Of course it's good to have 70ФПС at WoT when the other has 50 on the FX... But when the kernels starts to miss because the programmers fingers straightened and implemented mnogovato, there's nothing you can do about it. By the way the FX I sometimes just disable the extra core using one mladinich games he would read not very bad, at least the results are superior to those that the reviews. The Witcher 2 the difference is more than 100% achieved. But Totalvar shogun was the single core oak...
As for AMD, I think they are always rushed with FX, as in his time with Атлон64. They have a Hairdryer 3 to roll out, on a new process technology modified a little... Yes, and then the wild multinucleation go to 22nm... But what did it do
But now, I think the mass introduction of ДХ12 will start the second coming of multicore, judging by the reviews instrumentary this API pushes to this. And Intel with their Steilacom the same for this push, I read somewhere that they are going to develop the niche of household 8 core
PS
In the test on overah to inelam shoved 4 nuclear AMD a10 I look the same without dealing with architecture, not sat and also increased the performance... But why are they in the FX series is not updated?!
SUSUL1
A lot of the flow is implemented in what percentage of games ? or programs during the year more than 5 kernels in the download no where seen constantly 3-4 kernel to load and 20-30% high, so all these Breda about the corn and a lot of the flow of fiction and the duck launched by AMD that would in any way your bottom percent to shove
SUSUL1
about WOT-I watched the tests on overclockersuk,everything from the card depends,Yes there are cards where AMD gives 50+fps,but there are those where the average fps they have on the bottom 40 fps(map Stalingrad is like)
p.s. 8 nuclear,and even the 6 core Intel in the desktop segment is available will not be long that's a fact and always wrote)
Esthetix
Yes, that mnogovato not widely implemented as the sum of the capacity combination of high power graphics cards.
here recently the old-timers of the forum believed that 4+4Gb croshere never will give a total of 8Gb of VRAM, and no one has said that it will be possible sets are not equivalent, crofer and Crofer and SLI on the same machine.
But the presentation of DX12 say that it was possible.
So we will see how quickly the developers will learn new instrumentary. I think that this will happen quickly, Microsoft not sickly invested in Windows 10 and already handing out bags of money to the developers
What can I say, there are rumors that WG threatening to introduce support for DX12 at WoT a few patches
W3aMisterWinner
WoT is generally a strange thing.
But I must say that the HD client is not so sickly look fat in terms of consumption Monsta video card and on high settings I have a HD7950 rests on the ceiling 40-50FPS it is for the graphics card
SUSUL1
Open secret anyone who thinks that AMD CPU shoot when you come DKH 12 and a lot of flow , it is deeply misleading. A lot of the thread gives a plus only when physical nucleus does not divide the power between the streams . But AMD's main problem is that 2 threads already as 0.5 kernel for this reason AMD merges almost everywhere , only the gap is not large in the archives though as the gap from my 5960, there is not any separation and draining on all fronts, that's when 4790к was then Yes there was a gap in the archives and at some points rendering in 3dmax while hyper threading was not included. Regarding the addition of memory in the VC , honestly I just do not use different slami since the 7950gt and any problems that lack of performance has never been noticed, high in than this can be a plus addition to 4K resolution , but it's not something that addition is not enough , not enough power, the GPU is not mediocre , I 980 swung on postoyanku 1680 on the core and 4K is sometimes not enough GPU.