Wang said...

Krucinski the quiet badass
well you have 3 options: you're his friend, you're him, you admire him - all 3 options put you through the floor, just there where Gaugin. Vocabulary?) Well, Yes, selective delusion Playgroundsmore scale and a complete disregard for any arguments that is characteristic for youth maximalism. Local star)

Gauguin
Watson, once again you mess up, the reception that I used is not called an analogy, my young friend, you have not had time to understand the philosophy and logic and have tried to bring up the rhetoric, demagogue you our). Advice to you, hand over the first exam ( judging by your active interest in the 3 above-mentioned University disciplines and a complete lack of understanding, you have a crucial moment in the life of any student and they are waiting for you in the 1st year, after passing the ultimate Test of a Young person). And what about the Trinity - Gaugin, mind projection, it's your trump card (yet) in any dispute - do not trample itself in the dirt)

ihappy
of course not answer, but given our podsazhivanie can and will copy the answer from the wiki or through Google search with key words great mysliteli, philosophers, logic and give an answer from source) is a Funny character.

BeliiHlad wrote:
of course not answer, but given our podsazhivanie can and will copy the answer from the wiki or through Google search with key words great mysliteli, philosophers, logic and give an answer from source) is a Funny character.
The whole joke is that no matter how much he didn't answer every comment will be to drive it to a logical impasse.

BeliiHlad
BeliiHlad wrote:
the reception that I used is not called an analogy
Yes, he has another name. Specifically Children's surprise the young Logika White Coldness
BeliiHlad wrote:
Advice to you, hand over the first exam ( judging by your active interest in the 3 above-mentioned University disciplines and a complete lack of understanding, you have a crucial moment in the life of any student and they are waiting for you in the 1st year, after passing the ultimate Test of a Young person). And what about the Trinity - Gaugin, mind projection, it's your trump card (yet) in any dispute - do not trample itself in the dirt)
Don't try to Troll, you people simple-minded enough, so too much emotional tension. To the already verified line infantile level projections you Skalnik Gee-Gee you put the dull arrows and collective parody of sarcasm. And these are your smileys ... they get too much pain. Even the Wing 42 has learned to mimic the calm, seriously, take an example at least with him.

Krucinski the quiet badass
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Wang held a hooters - it's time to know and honor. Heh, heh... get out get out of my topic!
Sorry, but no, I can't miss proletarian tragicomedy Chill White.

Gauguin
Gauguin wrote:
Even the Wing 42 has learned to mimic the calm, seriously, take an example at least with him.
No doubt, evil is simple enough. Now, if my faithful Gauguin learned to at least imitate the reasoning of his words would be our common colossal achievement.

Gauguin
And nonsense it all progressed, my young friend, soon your paintings will turn into a set of unrelated words and Durkee briefly, I understand that for you it's too hard, but tried a Little more thinking before you hit the keyboard)

Wing42
Is he capable of in the arguments? Miserably losing on every front, it is trying to escape from the humiliation of changing the subject - the lack of arguments is already a side effect

BeliiHlad
BeliiHlad wrote:
soon your paintings will turn into a set of unrelated words
Your has become, however, you don't much care.
BeliiHlad wrote:
Miserably losing on every front above
To your entire nervous verbal slurry above was added to the auditory training. However, it was only a matter of time.
BeliiHlad wrote:
he's trying to escape from humiliation
Even if such an opportunity were you nobly saved me unibuses yourself, Mr. logic without analogy.

Consolegaming balloons CDA to the level of the craters on the moon. Here to the fortuneteller do not go.

Gauguin
gaugegauge do you even read what you write? Why each one of your answers is not the topic? )

Gauguin
I felt sorry for you, our young clown. Or are you so clumsily Troll or suffer from stupidity. Instead of having to come up with something original and his own, you're referring to My own words and translate their meaning itself is. I even at 7 years of age had a rich imagination. Do you read a book, and don't be the laughing stock of GHG 24/7.
P/S forgot to mention your Main pearl in this thread
You wouldn't be too surprised if there were more competent in matters of faith. Faith in all sorts of pagan events, like prophecies, psychic, astrology, charged water, etc. - this lielauce, and in the second a sign not of faith, but rather lack of faith and superstition that is not only undesirable, but sinful.
Was more literate in matters of faith and then show that you not only in matters of faith, but base knowledge is ignorant of the word at all. Remember to never shame - faith is the acceptance of something without evidence. The scientific approach is based on facts or at least scientific theories. ANY belief is unscientific, never write such heresy, I'm starting to think you're not a young Troll, and retarded.

BeliiHlad
BeliiHlad wrote:
I even at 7 years of age had a rich imagination
It is a pity that in the future you went to rapid degradation, judging by your infantile posts in this thread.
Besides, unlike you, I do not fantasize, but just stating a fact.
BeliiHlad wrote:
you refer to My words
...which in turn are link to my. Many passages points (in your case in this formulation). But in vain, you are too simple-minded and emotionally unstable for these techniques, as I said.
BeliiHlad wrote:
I felt sorry for you
Repeat this phrase a couple of times and with a smile, to no one doubted the pain that is behind it.

BeliiHlad wrote:
Was more competent in matters of faith
Now, tighten your humble mind and think about what kind of faith was discussed.
Spoiler
Spoiler
Solartalk TSS
Solariscentral

PS I Edited the comment, especially for particularly slow-witted.

BeliiHlad
BeliiHlad wrote:
well you have 3 options: you're his friend...
No, not a friend
BeliiHlad wrote:
you're him...
...Oh Yes, only a local fool can drive tutoshnih fierce modders nose with impunity and act in two ways at once. But again, do not guess - no he is not.
BeliiHlad wrote:
you admire him...
I wouldn't call it admiration, just his manner of entomological dissection of insects impressed me more than anybody else. The work of a true entomologist always pleasing to the eye.
BeliiHlad wrote:
all 3 options put you through the floor, just there where Gaugin.
And it is this manner of conversation you and discriminate. Unlike you, and indeed from almost all the PG people, leading anyone debate Gauguin can bear what his heart desires snowstorm, stupidity, nonsense or genius (it's his right, but like any other) is not turning to the assessments of the personal qualities of the opponent. To these categories the height of the plinth, with which you, unfortunately, are.
The question arises, if he well do without these personal assessments of the opponent, then why do the vast majority of the others (and you in particular), which they claim is much smarter than him can't do without these assessments?

Wang, Mayan calendar 2012 , end of the world to 2000goda, even leaflets glue, and then what? will the horsemen of the Apocalypse my future build?

Krucinski the quiet badass
really?) look at all his posts above, in a conversation with me poor so bombed that in every response to me has at least 1 itself is. And often several of them, do not tell me tales, about their absence. Stand by my opinion about the 3 options for you. And on account of you are modders can't keep track of All the bots,so it is quite valid option

Gauguin
Now, tighten your humble mind and think about what kind of faith was discussed.
about whatever was discussed, my young pupil, the essence of this post was what is faith and she is a scientific and is superstition, prejudice and so on and it lielauce. Despite the fact that faith ( of Any religion) and superstitions etc., etc. are ideas which run parallel to science, Does it not intersect - they are fundamentally different approach to the facts. But I understand that on a basic level critical thinking is not much that will develop sitting on PG.
And by the way, Gauguin you more and more merge down - you have written many times about the pain behind the smiles - projection-you feel pain - I feel for you. Sorry, what facts are you stating? Besides a complete disregard for any arguments you did not show Anything. Well, this is the essence of the online dispute, there is no appraisers. In any real situation you already threw a Shoe at me or shook his finger at his temple, because it's not even trolling - you are talking about And you're talking about B talking about B you go to And. Moreover, neither 1 of those not giving even the slightest argument. And every time you transition to a new subject made in the style of you (asshole, stupid, a bad man, and other epithets not particularly gifted IQ person), and I D'artagnan. Talk to someone from adults, they will explain to you that before you can say you are wrong and I am right you need to give at least something remotely similar to an argument. You have half of the forum writes about it, but it's either the skin of a Troll is too thick, or the number of convolutions is too small and, as a result, a completely incoherent jumble of words on the template that I mentioned above. Enough already.

BeliiHlad
BeliiHlad wrote:
what is faith and she scientific
Gauguin wrote:
this lielauce, and in the second a sign of faith
You have problems not only with logic but also with reading, you need to chew everything bit by bit.
1) there is No relationship between science and faith I do, which is evident from selected quotes. Just goes to domestic superstition from science, and from Orthodox Christianity.
2) As a citizen of a Christian state, I was referring to the literacy of the Christian faith. And according to her superstitions, like jasnovidenie and other koldunstvo people is a sin and heresy, and the Russian people calling themselves Christians who believe in such are illiterate in matters of their faith/dvoeverie.
BeliiHlad wrote:
you have written many times about the pain behind the smiles
How do you say...smart man with a normal state the fifth point does not use smilies in principle, even ashamed to talk about it. So, don't take offense, your itching and/or naivete is obvious.
BeliiHlad wrote:
projection
Arrows also do you the honor.
BeliiHlad wrote:
I feel sorry for you
I asked you to put a smile for fairness, but that's fine.
BeliiHlad wrote:
Besides a complete disregard for any arguments
It is impossible to ignore what is not. The first argument after many desperate Pietrasanta was presented to you in the previous post, and that it is based, as it turned out, on your misunderstanding of the meaning.
BeliiHlad wrote:
or the number of convolutions is too small
You have already shown your profanstvo some topics, now it has affected and neurobiology. Thumbs up.