\"March 18, 2018...\"

A. Soldier of Light wrote:
So you gave the answer, but did not give the answer? What, what? Schizophrenia or something?
Yes. But you.
You have my condolences.

Elections without choice. ash stump that he again himself choose.

18марта - same output? That well nafik, trudges to school, I haven't hit my head.

dredreal wrote:
Elections without choice. ash stump that he again himself choose.
No, he himself can not choose, just rating it so high (the fact) that the other stupid has no chance)

A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
rating him so high (fact)
The numbers on a piece of paper - completely. And among the people - so myself: someone who believes him, who does not believe. But in any case, it is better than its competitors.

Wing42 wrote:
The numbers on a piece of paper - completely. And among the people - so-so
It is a false statement.
You are not able to speak for the whole nation. Since you have no information about each person. You can be in the company of people who don't like Putin. But this does not mean that all the same. Just around you are the people. And those who do not think so, around you no.

For this and statistics. And if she says over and over again, the exact same information, then I believe it is true.
To deal with fake statistics is a hard job and most importantly grateful. It is immediately evident from the truth.
Whether Putin has a rating of 50%, not 68%, the homosexuals would have long ago all that's lying. But alas, I can't. As even liberalnie oprostite, talking about the same thing.

A. Soldier of Light wrote:
No, he himself can not choose, just rating him so high (fact)
The real fact is that the turnout is just over 30% - in this situation, what nafik high rating" and what kind of elections are we talking, if it is a failure?
And by the way Fraud - has not been canceled, none of the area. Who has the money calls the tune, for others.

Wing42 wrote:
among the people - so imagine: someone believes him, someone who doesn't believe.
Yes, but among the people this is about nothing, unfortunately. Here you're with someone in real life talk, what did they think? They are the same people who this overall rating is someone. And here we talk about the entire country. And who has accurate information? A better question: what *you* believe? ;] There's official, I'm here for him and only judge, and what else? )
WanRoi
By the way, I think the turnout should be absolute. Absolute maximum as possible. After all, if the people you complain about that favorite the chances are high, and you don't like it, well ahead, all the polls -) This is especially true for the Pro-Westerners that don't believe in elections and so on. And when they are in an argument to provide the turnout, this argument works against them ) they Say that in the elections they will not go, as it is a farce and so on. Well, then don't complain that you chose ^_^
As for rigging, I can see one thing: it is not necessary, when the favourite a huge advantage in the votes. Now, if between the two candidates was 45% and 55%, then Yes, another matter. And no, there is no need.
PS
How do you like the idea of giving a consolation prize for the candidate which takes the second place in the elections (the winner took first, followed by votes someone always second)? The prize is that the candidate in second place receives the post of Prime Minister ))

A. Soldier of Light wrote:
so, go ahead, all the polls -)
Hmm, here's what I wonder: how the military vote of the population and the jailers. Or they have special privileges?

WanRoi wrote:
The real fact is that the turnout is just over 30%
What's the turnout? I think you have the word the appearance I know, but none.
To determine turnout, we must first the turnout to fix. And this event should pass.
Or do you Wang???
WanRoi wrote:
in this situation, what nafik high rating" and what kind of elections are we talking, if it is a failure?
Failure - failure can be after the event. Never a failure before the events.
Well, not to lose even when the game was not.
Again, the problem with the definition of words.
WanRoi wrote:
And by the way Fraud - has not been canceled, none of the area. Who has the money calls the tune, for others.
I understand you define it, because it wants you to believe?
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
The prize is that the candidate in second place receives the post of Prime Minister ))
And it would be cool if I would win Sobchak))
This is a circus would be.

ihappy
Do you think I do really? I mostly don't care who's there and how runs the country, as personally for me it is neither positively nor negatively affected.

A. Soldier of Light
Well I'm still the talkers on the PG I read.

WanRoi wrote:
wonder how the vote part of the military population and the prison guards
I also wonder, by the way 8)

Wing42 wrote:
Do you think I do really? I mostly don't care who's there and how runs the country, as personally for me it is neither positively nor negatively affected.
I like to say that your statement is false, as you do not have full information to make their claims.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
I also wonder, by the way 8)
facepalm
It is not sacred information.
go to Google and find out.

ihappy wrote:
For this and statistics.
In authority and who funded? Suppose the firm producing briefs crappy quality hires statistical Agency for the study of demand and consumer evaluation of the quality of their product. And hiring, specifies the data needed by the firm (not necessarily corresponding to the truth, nothing grandmother or what paid yet) who would like to demonstrate to the public. Who will refuse, and someone will agree. With her and conclude a Treaty for many, many years.
ihappy wrote:
And if she says over and over again, the exact same information, then I believe it is true.
Amazingly, there are people who do not believe. And there are they? Perhaps it is, after all, someone writes a hard-hitting comments to various political, social, propaganda and news videos. Welcome to Youtube and see for yourself. In the same way, calculating the approximate ratio of for and against to judge real interest the number of supporters or opponents.
ihappy wrote:
To deal with fake statistics is a hard job and most importantly grateful.
Why? What is difficult to replace the numbers 3 and 33? Who and how will check? Not grateful? Is it a good fee, and for whom the mere possibility to lose a job is not a guarantee of gratitude?
ihappy wrote:
It is immediately evident from the truth.
Really? Can you give examples, well at least one.
ihappy wrote:
Whether Putin has a rating of 50%, not 68%, the homosexuals would have long ago all that's lying.
And unless they stop doing it?
ihappy wrote:
But alas, I can't.
Alas? Also cluck or just sorry?
ihappy wrote:
As even liberalnie oprostite, talking about the same thing.
The names of the questionnaires, references to their studies will be specified? Or would again have to rely on assurances that believe it's true.
ihappy wrote:
And it would be cool if I would win Sobchak))
This is a circus would be.
You think it's cool? For you, the election in the largest country on Earth circus?
Spolecnosti questions - simple answers. Or it will be difficult for such an Expert as ihappy?

ihappy
Dude, in your town elections never happened?
What are you going to determine if you already have statistics of past elections.
Smoke less, but I have a feeling that you are a child who knows nothing of what is happening in the world.

And who watched the debate now Solovyov? xD If it was possible to evaluate the performance of all the candidates on a 10 point scale, in:
1st place would put them just three:
- Zhirinovsky - he is good at oratory, no matter how trying to beat it, he clearly defends his point of view, everything is clear and to the point. Yavlinsky at every meeting constantly TRILLIUM the Crimea, had a good laugh) and Still had Klubnikina(*) soup with strawberries and garlic, hehehe
- Suraykin the impression of ideological man, a real President is a Communist, too, when Shevchenko he called Bandera, and even used a little bit and he would get his face hurt) IMHO it is high time the party Zyuganov to disperse and on its place to deliver the active Suraykin
- Baburin, this 30 years now as cheese in butter rolls, some he overfed, smooth Yes, cheesy, but speaks clearly and to the point, although suraykin on a combination of factors looks more promising.

2nd place
Goes to Yavlinsky, though everyone understands who this is and what are its goals, has performed well, albeit without specifics, but tried for it

3rd place
Sobchak - nothing really from her heard, takes third place

4 place
Klubnikin(*) ran away (and not for the first time) with debate, because it can not defend its position. As for presidential candidate is a shame. Even Sobchak in the background looks better, although it seemed that the bottom has broken and to embarrass myself even more impossible, but as it turned out - can.

Solovyov from all those showdown a permanent facepalm when he is shown in the frame)

PS Even PG vs farm xD

WanRoi wrote:
ihappy
Dude, in your town elections never happened?
What are you going to determine if you already have statistics of past elections.
Smoke less, but I have a feeling that you are a child who knows nothing of what is happening in the world.
What such statistics? Well Pokie

Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
In authority and who funded?
It depends on the Agency.
There Rosstat. There are all sorts of Levada. And there are still foreign. And a lot foreign.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Suppose the firm
Don't need this shiz to write. It is difficult to comment on. Just nonsense.

Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Amazingly, there are people who do not believe.
Yes, of course. Many people believe that aliens built the pyramids.
No one is stopping to think.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Welcome to Youtube and see for yourself.
Well, I do not doubt that you have the source of information is the circus.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Why? What is difficult to replace the numbers 3 and 33? Who and how will check? Not grateful? Is it a good fee, and for whom the mere possibility to lose a job is not a guarantee of gratitude?
It can only say Amateur.
You clearly data never worked.
To do so is impossible. Large amounts of data allow to identify the lies faster than you can paint.
It is impossible to forge data so the same. It is simply impossible.
And for this we must make the coordination of thousands of people, hundreds of companies. That the data are everywhere the same.
In short, don't be ridiculous.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
And unless they stop doing it?
No.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
The names of the questionnaires, references to their studies will be specified? Or would again have to rely on assurances that believe it's true.
No problem. Come to the paddock and read.
And now you're proof his innocence. Or merge crank?
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
you think it's cool? For you, the election in the largest country on Earth circus?
Of course. In any country is a circus. For you such a show and need to organize. So you chewed and watched.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Simple questions - simple answers.
You haven't noticed, but you shiz.
It was difficult to comment. You head off foil?

ihappy wrote:
It can only say Amateur.
You clearly data never worked.
To do so is impossible. Large amounts of data allow to identify the lies faster than you can paint.
It is impossible to forge data so the same. It is simply impossible.
And for this we must make the coordination of thousands of people, hundreds of companies. That the data are everywhere the same.
In short, don't be ridiculous.
This Stuff how to hit the airwaves:
Spoiler
ihappy wrote:
What such statistics? Well Pokie
For your life, how many times have you seen the election of the President, political parties, deputies...

ihappy
ihappy wrote:
Whether Putin has a rating of 50%, not 68%, the homosexuals would have long ago all that's lying. But alas, I can't. As even liberalnie oprostite, talking about the same thing.
Oh, no wonder he introduced resguardo, raised the salaries of Riot police,expanded 282, where even to go out and speak, you need to get permission. Do not forget about the police reform to the police, after which the level of banditry has grown, and the amount borrowed for the huskies in the Internet grew. We can say more about it support that on the Internet, but for the money the people selling Home.
Over 500 rubles and a pair of compensatory time off, in an order going. Video FIRE! Fawn hard: where is the promised money to, from what organization sent You, ... Not say
As there is support
And security posters? Machines are guarded by Putin's posters. HAHHAH! In interention cheat votes, views and dislikes for the opposition. In the real world in support of Vladimir Kh. it's 3 people! He collected dunno how signature. Bulk once collected, the cloud people came and all this was visible.
Liberal?! The most important liberal Vladimir Vladimirovich H.:
Here it is!