\"March 18, 2018...\"

stalker7162534
Then you have to trace you by ip, and let a rocket. Psssss..........boom.

taburetckinvasily
He's like the Phoenix will still rise from the ashes, better spend a missile on someone else.

Interestingly,this topic created people friendlyfor you to put on the record of potential clients? xD it Seems to me that to indicate your choice,up to the actual elections themselves,and especially to impose it on anyone,is punished? Perhaps I am mistaken.

ihappy
ihappy wrote:
...on your sheet to be more responsive will not.
But for God's sake. I can't resist the temptation to respond to your. Moreover, in entomology (I told you in our interview, wrote about his hobby) as to science, do not require the consent of the insect on its preparation. Flea, fly, grasshopper or cockroach can until you're blue squeal that will no longer respond to the pricks of pins entomologist. He don't care about and it will continue to do so as long as it is interesting.
Besides, the poor insect and unaware that the researcher stupid bugs just as well not care about right or not study insects as the primitive thinking of these creatures is taken by the entomologist as a given. Important is the process of sticking needles in a mortal carcass worthless aphids...

However, I got carried away and, as they say - it is time to return to our sheep (only in a figurative, folk sense).
Lack of basic knowledge of rhetoric and truly asinine stubbornness in wanting to be always right is pushing our magnificent ihappy to a rather controversial statement that if you follow his own logic may not be very pleasant most ihappy.

Need examples? They have me.
Known in our swamp, our former and now theirs verbiage, like any reasonable person (which, unfortunately, he did not take) are not always in a hurry with the statements, preferring neutral assumptions. What actually writes our glorious ihappy.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Sometimes you just think, think, think... it is not approval, but only opinion entitled to be.
What our brave braggart said:
ihappy wrote:
Any opinions expressed this assertion.
Well. As Zarathustra would say - you can work with it. Any made anyone a suggestion for ihappy is a statement.
Well, for example, you can make the assumption that ihappy ----------- (instead of a dash you can put anything). For me, as for all other entomologists it is only speculation and not necessarily true. For ihappy according to his own logic - truth.
Any, embedded in the dash that anyone could not be accused of insulting (after all, they did not argue but only assume) our honourable ihappy, which of course makes simple assumptions at face value.
....
Gentlemen, a dash is empty and available. Go ahead, bathe our pet ihappy assumptions.
....
ihappy
Will speulderbosweg me say that follow thee reaction in the spirit of fool (quite likely, knowing who we are dealing) is extremely convincing and highly inappropriate in the light of information given above.

ihappy wrote:
Any opinions expressed this assertion.
You? I don't know, probably you know better 8) And let others say for themselves here ;]
ihappy wrote:
also believe that you can buy the whole world? ))))
No.
ihappy wrote:
I think that even with a turnout of 1% of the elections should be considered honest.
Formally, that is, if one percent is considered. Another thing, if you're talking about informal, humanly turnout in the one percent is a joke, and not an attendance of 8)
ihappy wrote:
After all, 99% agree with the choice of the 1%. That's fair.
I do not agree, they do the choice not made. It legally can be defined as I agree, in fact, sorry, objectively, they really did not select and may not agree. But yeah, eventually everything is solved formally, and according to what is written in the law: if one percent is considered a turnout, so be it, alas, and let the other 99 percent don't whine then. I had to go to the polls )

Honestly it? But here is definitely NOT without options. For the term fair is already from the category human, and if the opinion of 99 percent is not taken into account (regardless of the reason), it is not fair that the decision will be made on the basis of the opinions taken into account percentage of the population. Regarding 99 percent of this is completely *not fair*. Clarification, in short, what is fair. Not always by law, all honest work ;]
[Denis] wrote:
Just so people are forced to vote?
Heh 8) I have introduced a decree that all must vote and the penalty for failure to vote. For nefig. It is necessary to vote and to the point, for me, is undeniable. Then have all sorts of other questions and so on. But should vote to no then not dare utter a word about unfair elections, when the turnout was much less than half of the population, in fact, not considering the opinion of most of the population.
Wing42 wrote:
This guy is a demagogue, as he is - he put forward the proposition, he says that this is nonsense, it does not happen, excuses are for the weak and so on instead of the argument.
All true, but I do try to give it to the judgement and explanation 8)

taburetckinvasily
Yavlinsky himself said that he was a simple worker, miner, here let sticks on mine.

[Denis]
I'm not writing what anyone want, and about the fact that he is worthy of all, who is at the moment.

Putin>all.

About yesterday's farce Solovyov.
I sumlevayus however.
Brave neo-Communist Tovarishch Maxim, rushing late to a debate in the Studio. Quite by accident (a piano in the bushes?) at the entrance to the Studio he meets a strange woman. Despite the fact that in a hurry, however stops and listens to her complicated history. Delves into the essence and decides to take her with him. Successfully passes the guard, though, as one might expect crossing the woman was not. In addition, the presence of the presidential candidates in the television station, not the last people in the country, meant to the most stringent security measures and careful compliance with the access regime.
Well, okay. God is with them. Slipped probably the charm of neo-Communist and an immediate desire to make a woman as its representative allowed him, bypassing all the red tape with ease to do it.
Then filled with righteous anger for his opponent, another neo-Communist States that supposedly refuses to use his last opportunity for promotion and gives his time to this poor woman, so she told his tragic story. Again, quite by accident extremely unpleasant for the other candidate, is also present in the Studio
Leading absolutely indifferent said sho STE go maybe to break the law is not zhelaet, they say, requires the permission of lawyers and representatives of the electoral Commission, in the margins of the Studio. For advertising the electoral Commission gives the nod (10, 15, 30 minutes?...) and a woman, as a representative of the candidate in presidents of the country can pour out their grief.
Wise retired the candidate of the Communist party, leaving in his place, frankly not the best replacement, even the worst of all. But that is what it is. Next is an ugly attempt to silence the primitive cry of revelation women and the subsequent fight with her brand new defender...
The result? Dirt (quite lethal) for one of the candidates announced, time to refute it anymore. The debate is over...
...
Spoilerthe story, don't you think?