\"March 18, 2018...\"
%Выборы2018%To whom you give your precious vote?
Zhirinovsky? Apple? Sobchak? Breast? Suraykin? Baburin? Titov? Putin in the end of it all...
Or do you boycott such an interesting idea?
ihappy wrote:
Well, I do not doubt that you have the source of information is the circus.
Maybe Youtube and the circus. It's just open source of information, the most readily available. And I did not speak about the truth or falsity (as well as not referred to it), to give them information, but only drew attention to the comments regarding these data, again, without considering the quality of this information.
For example. On Youtube there is information that a rabbit is a predator. Suppose I don't know if this is true. What do I do? Read the comments to that statement. Again, let's say about 30% think it's true, 30% write, it's a lie, the rest I doubt. Thus it is possible to form your own opinion instead of relying on official statistics concerning the affiliation of hares to predators. The essence is clear?
ihappy wrote:
It can only say Amateur.
Perhaps I should clarify - Amateur only asked. And it's forgivable, because he is a layman. And what does he get in response?
ihappy wrote:
You clearly data never worked.
Of course, the Amateur and he knows it.
ihappy wrote:
To do so is impossible.
Why? What's to stop the owner of the Agency to order its employees (which pays the salaries) to specify the desired customer data?
ihappy wrote:
Large amounts of data allow to identify the lies faster than you can paint.
Who will identify and refer to? For large amounts of data that collect agencies and that, in turn, pays the customer for the collection of these data?
ihappy wrote:
It is impossible to forge data so the same. It is simply impossible.
Heh, heh... just one impossible. And again the question of Amateur - why?
ihappy wrote:
And for this we must make the coordination of thousands of people, hundreds of companies.
You can buy them, they can be ordered. I doubt whether these companies hundreds. Having a material or administrative resources data manipulation is feasible.
ihappy wrote:
That the data are everywhere the same.
So you believe that these details are not the same? Then do what kind of statistics you can tell if the data received from thousands of people, hundreds of companies are not the same?
ihappy wrote:
In short, don't be ridiculous.
In short, (comma), a layman forgivable.
ihappy wrote:
And now you're proof his innocence.
Innocence of what? Questions? His confidence? Assumptions? I'm a layman, do not claim that, but only ask questions. That you know everything, you ask...
And in response only:
ihappy wrote:
Don't need this shiz to write.
ihappy wrote:
Just nonsense.
ihappy wrote:
In short, don't be ridiculous.
ihappy wrote:
You haven't noticed, but you shiz.
And by the way,
ihappy wrote:
In any country is a circus. For you such a show and need to organize. So you chewed and watched.
And you're ready to chew for those who doubt whether to chew and watch? And at the same time and believe...
ihappy wrote:
It was difficult to comment.
ihappy wrote:
You head off foil?
No, but dealing with Your Splendor and even lead applied (just in case)
ihappy
Spoiler you are not surprised that almost no one responds to your statements about the crazy delusions, the amateurism of your opponents?
ihappy wrote:
I like to say that your statement is false, as you do not have full information to make their claims.
And he just claimed? Sometimes you just think, think, think... it is not approval, but only opinion entitled to be.
- Rick Sk1mmer wrote:
And who watched the debate now Solovyov?
I looked at the beginning of March and including the first (February 28). The first was the most interesting 8) But for the most part it is a Blizzard. A lot of words, matters little (if at all).
- Rick Sk1mmer wrote:
Zhirinovsky - he is good at oratory,
It's all the trolls, who are not lazy, in fact sometimes says something, but the Troll loves more than 8) Buffoon shorter. According to him, the post of chief he had started several wars as soon as he dealt with his enemies (he says with the enemies of Russia, but we all understand what it is). Emotionally disturbed, and his decisions as head will depend on the mood. Not good...
- Rick Sk1mmer wrote:
IMHO it is high time the party Zyuganov to disperse and on its place to deliver the active Suraykin
I agree, Zyuge it's time to retire for a long time (although judging by his money, he doesn't need, lol). Always laughed at these false Communists who have savings in the billions of rubles ^_^ they are Communists... I beg you...
Babur and Titus are not needed, they bluntly percent in other takes and nothing more. Is and Sobko could unite and we would get a higher percentage, it makes no sense to go separately, it will do nothing and no prospects, because they are almost the same. Well, Yes, Breast is necessary to leave a normal Communist (the Breast to withdraw from the election, there, also, there are quite a legally justified reason).
In the end, were the candidates: the favourite, a Communist, Pro-Western and a clown 8) Four players instead of eight.
Krucinski the quiet badass
The right questions to ask him 8) In fact, this is exactly what I asked him to tell how it all works, since he had to deal with it. But the answer was go yourself and find out. Of course this is not the answer...
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
And he just claimed? Sometimes you just think, think, think... it is not approval, but only opinion entitled to be.
Any opinions expressed this assertion.
WanRoi wrote:
This Stuff how to hit the airwaves:
And what is this nonsense you're saying?
Error on TV, means that Putin's support?
WanRoi wrote:
For your life, how many times have you seen the election of the President, political parties, deputies...
That is, you have no statistics.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
The right questions to ask him
You also believe that you can buy the whole world? ))))
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
And in response only:
This is not the answer. It is a statement of fact.
What you write, can write either child. Either very stupid people.
But that's okay, you as a regular demagogue, pull words out of context and cling to them.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Innocence of what? Questions? His confidence? Assumptions? I'm a layman, do not claim that, but only ask questions. That you know everything, you ask...
So you don't have Proff. But are you sure. What a lying sack of shit.
on your sheet to be more responsive will not. Anyway, you pluck the words from the sentence and talking about nonsense.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
But the answer was go yourself and find out. Of course this is not the answer...
What you're interested in. Ask specific, answer. And to write a story report, I don't want.
By the way you also take the information from the circus, go on YouTube and look.
Or are you just a quiet badass blah blah blah know, and to search for information is not for you?
But that is not surprising.
VOVAN WOLF
It's your propagandiskogo rollers harness away.
They do not say that Putin is no support. Generally and absolutely.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
In the real world in support of Vladimir Kh. it's 3 people!
You of course have the data to prove it.
Or utubia said?
ihappy
That's when the polls come 55% of the city population - and then talk about fair election. And while the situation is such that it is a show of freedom of choice pseudo-democracy.
WanRoi wrote:
That's when the polls come 55% of the city population - and then talk about fair election. And while the situation is such that it is a show of freedom of choice pseudo-democracy.
Why 55%, why not 65% or 75%?
I think that even with a turnout of 1% of the elections should be considered honest.
After all, 99% agree with the choice of the 1%. That's fair.
You're as Baba Yaga have the right to scream I.
ihappy
ihappy wrote:
I think that even with a turnout of 1% of the elections should be considered honest.
After all, 99% agree with the choice of the 1%. That's fair.
If in the opinion of 99% of candidates is not normal, then how can they agree with the proverbial choice of the 1%? This one percent of the population goes to vote for their candidate in which they believe. The remaining 99% do not go to vote because the list of candidates not the candidate who would share their ideas about what should be the power in the country. To say that in this case 99% agree with the choice of the 1% is fundamentally wrong, as in Russia in power for some time and is no competitive element, and decent options, candidates, parties, between whom it would be possible to make a choice. In fact, there is a single authoritarian Russia and around the subordinate party branches in the face of the Communist party, the liberal democratic party, Apple, Fair Russia" and any other, regardless of what ideology or concept of the state system they adhere to - in words are all different, but one Director.
The government itself will take care of your choice and make sure that he was correct.
Wing42 wrote:
If in the opinion of 99% of candidates is not normal, how can they be agree with notorious choice 1%
So. Not come to the polls, so I agree. All the rest is excuses for the weak.
Wing42 wrote:
In fact, there is a single authoritarian Russia and around the subordinate party branches in the face of the Communist party, the liberal democratic party, Apple, Fair Russia" and any other, regardless of what ideology or concept of the state system they adhere to - in words are all different, but one Director.
In fact, it is that how you justify your choice.
And it really is still possible to argue.
Wing42 wrote:
The government itself will take care of your choice and make sure that he was correct.
Of course.
But why do you think that the government does not suit the majority.
Wing42 wrote:
To say that in this case 99% agree with the choice of the 1% is fundamentally wrong
On the contrary.
A concerned citizen would come to the polls and spoilt the Bulletin.
And so, you are saying that. Come up with stories about that one, Putin does not support that the turnout is small and etc.
Although this is not you come up with.
Ryazancev
Today at work our supervisor gathered everyone and asked to report after the election, SMS-kami.Tin.What have we come to?Send us to the polls in voluntary-a compulsory form.Well,we state employees.But even in private firms make.
Wing42
The government itself will take care of your choice and make sure that he was correct.
I found someone to prove it.Not just the same as people are forced to go to the polls.I the election,by the way,20 years was not.This time too, changed my mind,but...but at work forced to do it.
ihappy
Again, you're not in the hole climb.Would sit in his ass and not stick out.Just so people are forced to vote?Leave with your couch tests,the hornless deer
[Denis]
Our Wipers also do the same. March the order came across the great and mighty ?.
[Denis]
[Denis] wrote:
I found someone to prove it.
Well, it seems to be true. This guy is a demagogue, as he is - he put forward the proposition, he says that this is nonsense, it does not happen, excuses are for the weak and so on instead of the argument.
Wing42
To lunatic and lunacy have not yet reached?)))Wait,when he will end pseudoelement you put the diagnosis:you're crazy and all your messages – your shiz.Dispute for the sake of continuing the dispute, the whole thing
NoneOne2010
So for him and don't want to go and win it,as the people's choice
Looking for the game. Remember the idea. It is a first person shooter where you after the first mission can drive a car with autopilot. The beginning of this : you are somewhere in captivity and put you in a prison bus. Suddenly this bus will presentsa the van of the rebels. You go for them. Then I remember very dimly. Please help this game was played 5 years ago. Can't remember exactly.