That you sin ???
Interestingly there is sinless People or souls ???? What is whose sin ?????Gauguin
Gauguin wrote:
given the shameful spectacle, a demonstration of psychological distress and attempts to keep a good mine at bad game, which usually accompany all your exhaling pain, attempt to cover
The support that you give my statements do every time shameful and disgraceful, pleasantly surprised to find that you realize that.
Gauguin wrote:
I want to note that mentally healthy person even to write about this disgusting...but we're talking about you.
And again a surprise - compliments. Miraculously I get (not to say that it makes me very happy) under your definition of mentally healthy person, so how to write about you disgusts me in the extreme, I would even say disgusting. But what to do - someone has to debunk your paskudnik a lie.
ColonelJason
ColonelJason wrote:
The support that you give my statements, do each time shameful and disgraceful, pleasantly surprised at what you realize
Of course, given that this support is filled with your quotes. By the way...surprisingly, even realizing that you have nothing to lose and decided to go unconscious by the maximum of the stupidity and obviousness of their answers, you can't think through the moves in their poor attempts to make jokes. Wait, when you begin to fix my posts when quoting and out of context is the next step in your painful drip saliva.
Gauguin
Gauguin wrote:
Of course, given that this support is filled with your quotes.
Absolutely redundant clarification:what to expose themselves helplessly pripadajucim a laughing stock forcing you the truth of my assertions about you - pretty obvious. It is unclear why you focused on this. Apparently they decided to give an illustration of the stupidity of ill-conceived moves that work, again, unnecessary, as this painting is permanently in the background of your seizures embittered the Christian.
Gauguin wrote:
you can't think through the moves in their poor attempts to make jokes.
Strange it would be to consider some passages communicating with a person who crawls or simply silence, when a question comes to being, or self-invited to the insults, helplessly potyavkivaet itself is.
Gauguin wrote:
Wait, when you begin to fix my posts when quoting
God forbid - I would not be able to expose you as a pathetic worthless and your beliefs - so bestial opportunistic lies, as you do yourself. Actually, I'm just spotlights that focus on how disgusting it may look like humanoid creature that has lost all interest in what would be something male or human.
ColonelJason
ColonelJason wrote:
Absolutely redundant clarification:what to expose themselves helplessly pripadajucim a laughing stock forcing you the truth of my assertions about you - pretty obvious
After much thought, apparently marred by shaking hands, dripping with saliva and General discomfort, you have just enough to cough up such a ridiculous and crooked screwed...attention... projection. However, I know that because you apparently want to make me feel compassion and mercy for your intellectual and mental infirmities and diligently doing it hints their increasingly pathetic attempts. Well, I can only recommend you to return to the role of local jester absurdist-surrealist direction in which I saw you progress. To watch as you squirm from the pain, which does not stimulate your brain activity, judging by the increasingly gaudy and sentimental explosions of your morbid consciousness is of course its funny, but in the end, and I have a heart.
Gauguin
Tell me, do you think that if you don't like to use the phrase itself is a few dozen extra letters, then your answer would be pathetic enough? Vain fear. Moreover, you should start to learn brevity: British lady-Servotronic you this morning licking feet, put forward a wonderful initiative, to improve the morality of our citizens - was asked to write feathers. So, if things work out, and you will continue to mirror so much, you no feathers is not enough.
Gauguin wrote:
After much thought
Oh, time to response were considered...Touching, but in moments such Amateur mistakes, my confidence in the fact that you're a person of low moral and volitional qualities (in the background of testosterone deficiency) , begins to waver, and gives way to the assumption that lead you all the same psychological disorder. Through that is not quite clear: you suck shit with the master's boot because there for you are nutrients, or just the feces of the Fatherland is sweet and pleasant to you (here, it is not clear what the cal of the Fatherland yesterday you ate the bar -we have English subjects). And, accordingly, it is unclear how to treat you correctly: with disgust or contemptuous pity.
Gauguin
How is it unreasonable? Here you go, from recent events, when the breeders of all Russia gathered chumps (myself having yachts and mansions) and said that poverty should be accepted, and that all the wars from the desire of a better life. Implying of course that the oligarchs have all the same not to interfere with stealing. Impose trying to rule by ozovym opinion.
Gauguin
A, i.e. the fact that the following almshouse wants to subjugate the square, a lie?
Gauguin
I mean, no? Religion is not to control the masses? You don't see the obvious or something, I don't understand. Try to explain, and also why it suddenly turned out that this opinion has atheistic roots, lol )
ColonelJason
ColonelJason wrote:
suck shit
Hmm...well, summarizing your shameful attempts remains to once again marvel at how hard you bury yourself and your public image is even deeper than it already did. There are two options - either during your convulsive convulsions or simply put, printing posts to someone who does not take seriously your ridiculous tortured nonsense, your mental activity is switched off completely, thereby bringing you to the level of a tapeworm, or are you deliberately mocking himself for the same reason, like the school outcast who decided that it was better to do it on their own, acting as a clown in public. This suggests that despite your vulgar Ametis you will be saved yurodstvuya. The tragedy is that despite the fact that you repeatedly showed his mental inconsistency, you could save the image polite fool thanks to the newly chosen strategy is ridiculously overloaded with pretentious shizofreniceski sheets, filled with erudition of low quality and content. Let such your attempts of petty-bourgeois and ridiculous, but on the surface they might seem convincing to some people, especially gullible people. But continuing to bend, as specified in the quotation disgusting, but indicative of a line, you hammered the nail in the coffin of this dubious, a hastily woven of your image, proving that you are not only no dignity, no culture - not even the possibility of their occurrence in the future, and hope that others will mistake you for something more than ridicule. Moreover, with what delight you bring the topic of eating feces, though disgusted, yet completely deprives you of a small residue of individuality, dissolving you in a fairly common rule If a liberal says about poop and genitals, check his pulse.
RussianQuaker
RussianQuaker wrote:
A, i.e. the fact that the following almshouse wants to subjugate the square, a lie?
Not quite true. Rather In the ragged square, the status of which is below the average I want to build a temple with the subsequent landscaping of the remaining part of the square. But you understand that if you say so, similar crowd to create would not work - it would be half man, including the organizers, and the scandal, to put it mildly, would be much weaker. But what, then, is the echo of matzah to write the article, don't you think? Shame on you...
A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
I mean, no? Religion is not to control the masses?
No. The Christian religion is the revelation of God, it is not intended to be a worldly political instrument. Therefore, it is generally for these purposes fit badly, if under control mean classic bydliste sinister impose you morality to you exploit. For such purposes, the modern liberal ideology reinforced by evolutionism - effectively a hundred times.
Gauguin
I see from the British cal you some potatoria- he takaski has acquired a particularly fat, shapeless form, and filled with additional content very shameful character (remember, I implored you not to depart on a familiar samtale scheme in any other form of black rhetoric, you have what is called float, but,see, my advice you did not heed). If your attempts to suck up any of my antagonist, a surprise, of course, did not - helpless animals in moments of danger tend to bunch up (I sympathize, by the way, the collapse of your misalliance with a soldier of light is to lick the character such a manner was disgusting, probably even you (or I overestimate, and licked the taste of the material role for a long time not playing?), and, after such sacrifices, to get such a slap in the face...), then your transition to the nails in the coffin of causes some confusion. Shouting drain counted! before you choke on own waste production typical of many local daredevils of the debate, but I was expecting something more. Well, rather more - was expecting something more classical: it seemed to me that your last words will be be yourself.
Gauguin wrote:
The Christian religion is the revelation of God, it is not intended to be a worldly political instrument.
Sincere man. So surprised by such beliefs hundreds of thousands (millions?) the people who died in religious wars ,often overtly political nature. Although, of course, a simple, apolitical diverse robbery took place.
- DILOR-
- DILOR - wrote:
Though of course, the question is slippery, it is necessary to turn to the books for clarification.
Contact be sure, but in General, you surely have a point.
Gauguin wrote:
The Christian religion is the revelation of God, it is not intended to be a worldly political instrument.
But it is to them. Maybe not quite as ordinary laws and politics, but close to it. Traditions, commandments: what can I do what you cannot. How to live, when and how to fast. Is this not a set of rules for order in the nation? The order management with the help of the clergy, who listened to and respected. For me it is quite a control. The masses.
Gauguin wrote:
if by managing to mean a classic bydliste sinister impose you morality to you exploit
Well, why just exaggerating 8)
Gauguin wrote:
For such purposes, the modern liberal ideology reinforced by evolutionism - effectively a hundred times.
Not, scientific knowledge, science is separate from politics and laws, what is it?
PS
1) the Christian religion recognizes the Bible as a guide, in short, essential book, right? It is said there about the kind of circumcision, which, however, Christians do not? And something strange that the chosen people think (himself) the Jews and the Christians, who is this then? To clarify these points, I'm confused...
2) Also an interesting question about the war. Religious. Taught religions of the world? Wage war with wrong teaching? God this bloodshed necessary? To clarify...
A. Soldier of Light
Sin is what corrupts our life. It is a violation of the Commandments.
Sweet the sin but bitter the fruit! !
Sin is always tempting at the beginning. Always! ! That's the cunning and deceit of the devil. Dark evil power presses and causes a person to do sin.
But then this sin, this passion ALWAYS leads to human misery.
And repentance for sin God will accept only when when people are going to hate this sin that repents. Hypocrisy God does not accept. And his grace does not. Worship sin, it means, worship the devil and not God.
- DILOR-
well, you Petrosyan)) I just monitor not spat with laughter) that the PM can only push people one hemisphere and then in the ass))
- DILOR-
I myself am a believer (baptized: Christianity, Orthodoxy), but not religious. And easy to talk on this subject and others, which concern the faith or the universe. The term sin is seen for what they are: something is wrong. Not because it in religion, some written down, but rather from the position of universal morality or something. That is my understanding of sin is not limited by religious teachings, but that's a personal matter that under the sin mean. Although it seems like there is a formal definition, but we have here not a scientific forum, and we're not scientists, we are ordinary people -)
Why is it hard to be righteous and easier to resist temptation? Apparently, so conceived. But judging from the point of view of atheism, then there is nothing to discuss ) the Topic is not for them.
- DILOR - wrote:
Dark evil power presses and causes a person to do sin.
No, not forced. Offers. Freedom of choice is given to us is absolute, God or anyone else don't control us, we make decisions.
- DILOR - wrote:
Worship sin, it means, worship the devil and not God.
Simplification. God can not take into account human nature, for the Holy innocent and almost none. Which means that all worship the fallen? Well, the same nonsense )
A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
But it is to them. Maybe not quite as ordinary laws and politics, but close to it. Traditions, commandments: what can I do what you cannot. How to live, when and how to fast. Is this not a set of rules for order in the nation? The order management with the help of the clergy, who listened to and respected.
Of course. It is only about how to prioritize. Picture of course can close the hole in the wall, but it is assumed that it is valuable primarily for its artistic merit.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
The Christian religion recognizes the Bible as a guide, in short, essential book, right?
So. But the New Testament stands out.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
circumcision, which, however, Christians do not?
Now it makes no sense to do what was only the old Testament carnal way of baptism before the Savior came.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
God's chosen people
God's chosen people is not the best people, as you might think. It is only the people in which the Lord demonstrates that he wants to convey to people. But no more. This nation could be any other.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
science is separate from politics
I like your simplicity.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Also an interesting question about the war. Religious. Taught religions of the world? Wage war with wrong teaching?
No, religion is not taught anything similar. A scalpel can kill, but can be saved, in my opinion it is obvious.
A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
God can not take into account human nature, for the Holy innocent and almost none.
Human nature was damaged and healing from the Lord. Nature the sins are not justified.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
but rather from a position of universal morality
I never heard of. Beyond religion, at least.
Gauguin wrote:
Human nature was damaged and healing from the Lord.
In fact, this question about the meaning of life. And if people chose not to believe and be a believer, but lives adequately and the benefit of society brings, what it fundamentally worse than any believer that believes in righteousness?
It turns out, from the point of view of all the Orthodox and the fanatics of religion are only believers are normal people, and it is a de facto lie. God definitely would not encourage liars 8)
Gauguin wrote:
Nature the sins are not justified.
So I'm not saying. In our nature is that weakness for temptations, curiosity, it is. But there is a reason to be used: these are different from animals.
Gauguin wrote:
Beyond religion, at least.
Thus, you rule out the presence of moral attitudes of the person that is not a believer. How cute )) And as infinitely stupid.
- DILOR - wrote:
Maybe because he though fallen, but all the same angel?
Does it matter who he was? I think the important thing is who he has become and is ;]
Gauguin wrote:
Now it makes no sense to do what was only the old Testament carnal way of baptism before the Savior came.
But somebody continues to do? Why?
Gauguin wrote:
A scalpel can kill, but can be saved, in my opinion it is obvious.
Thus, the fault lies with the people, in this case, on the Ministers of their religions, which allowed to shed blood. And then I propose to consider priests (they are the same people) the mediator between us and God? ^_^ How can I believe those who are guilty in wars on religious grounds? Or why didn't God prevent them?