That you sin ???
Interestingly there is sinless People or souls ???? What is whose sin ?????A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Thus, you rule out the presence of moral attitudes of the person that is not a believer
No, not exclude it. Just regardless, he acknowledges God or not, His laws continue to act on it.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
And if people chose not to believe and be a believer, but lives adequately and the benefit of society brings
What does it mean to live adequately? And the benefit of society - a dubious criterion for the godly, on the contrary, the samples of living by faith trying to move away from the mundane. This time. Second - though faith without works is dead, but works without faith is also:
however, knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ and we believed in Christ Jesus, to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law: for by the deeds of the law will justify no flesh - a Message to the AP. Paul Galatians 2:16.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
But somebody continues to do?
That someone continues to do does not mean that the way to do it. Besides, you probably are not talking about Christians.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
And then I propose to consider priests (they are the same people) the mediator between us and God?
Like, it's your right. Your right also make ridiculous generalizations and pull all priests with the same brush on the same basis as doctors can rake in for her, Recalling the experiments of Dr. Mengele.
Well if people who have dedicated themselves to the service of God, call the civilian population, decorama and call apply power(physical with physical consequences!)
Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin:
SpoilerSavages and thugs. No other way to call those who are crushing the fence in Ekaterinburg — watched the video of this "civil protest"... And these people are talking about "legality", that they are "a ray of light in the darkness"?! The response to the riots should be only the use of force. Legitimate and decisive. And powerful, the peaceful, legal civil action of those who do not accept savages and thugs, primarily, at the headquarters of the latter and at their online hangouts. And those "rays of light", which savages and thugs to protect the media, no better than them does. If they do not condemn them as condemned by Orthodox arsonists machines after the blasphemy of the Teacher, they will admit that they are moral savages and thugs.
It says that some who are stuck in the days of feudalism, the Holy Crusades. Such a shame to Russia and its President, because for so many years, people haven't been taught.
Nightingale droppings(probably of Italian origin?):
Spoiler which protection of the Park in question, when a half thousand freaks that Park trampled and thrown the fragments of the broken fence in the river?! Now it is called "we have to defend the Park", "we are fighting for the environment"? Damage, I think, caused the Park higher than all what can be said (...)
It is an Orthodox temple, built at the founding of the city in 1723. This is the temple which is the heart and soul of the city. And the whole demoniac of this city is evident in the fact that in 1930 it was destroyed. Destroyed the temple, built in honor of St. Catherine (...) On the former site of the Cathedral was broken square
And after these releases, no country has the right to continue to call itself a superpower.
From the story:
Polerowany the city's founding in 1723 and destroyed in 1930. Stood in the center of the city, on the high left Bank of the Iset river, East of the Cathedral
In 1998 for the 275th anniversary of Ekaterinburg next to the memorial cross by the architect A. V. Dolgov, was built a stone chapel with 5 domes.
April 10, 2010 in Yekaterinburg, held a rally in defense of the Work Area, where the Yekaterinburg diocese planned to reconstruct the Church of St. Catherine, which was supposed to clean the square and the fountain. Later, the diocese has refused these plans.
The post-Soviet period. Recovery plans can read:
Спойлерhttps://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%95%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80_(%D0%95%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3)
WanRoi
WanRoi wrote:
What kind of protection the Park in question, when a half thousand freaks that Park trampled and thrown the fragments of the broken fence in the river?! Now it is called "we have to defend the Park"
Look - quite true and logical, considering where his feet are growing at the so-called defenders of the Park. But if you meant it as saying Solovyov, Yes...indeed, this may not be true. He is a man of magic, even if he tells you that the sky is blue it will turn purple.
Gauguin
I was struck by the fact that Solovyov was lazy ass," - says about the city's history, but he stupidly reads a prepared(by someone) lyrics.
sins it's funny, somewhere in Africa if you do not eat the heart of a crocodile for example, then you will not get into the local heaven, the Christian, suicide is considered a mortal sin, but Muslims have to blow themselves up is considered a passport to heaven, double standards
Delphis
Different rules (in this case, beliefs) among different categories of citizens, it is not a double standard.
A. Soldier of Light
God has set for human standards of good and evil and if a person deviates from the good and doer of evil in the eyes of God, he commits a sin. While we are not perfect we all sin because you can't fulfill perfectly the will of God.
Spoiler
Jesus said, Of sin, because they believe not on Me - In.16,9. To this add anything is impossible and even illegal. All other definitions of sin given in the Bible, covers the internal contents of these words of the Lord and are private, explain certain of his (sin) side.
Spoiler
WanRoi
WanRoi wrote:
What kind of protection the Park in question, when a half thousand freaks that Park trampled and thrown the fragments of the broken fence in the river?! Now it is called "we have to defend the Park",
What a pleasure to watch dirty older, have lost all interest in his case not opohmelitsja propagandists...And, of course, at least it's nice that shyly wrap around for their patrons has failed propagandha
Gauguin wrote:
Look - quite true and logical, considering where his feet are growing at the so-called defenders of the Park.
Of course it is clear, whence legs grow from the defenders of the Park. From where the legs grow from the defenders of our Fatherland, who also had to tread pretty and even pobrodit the tracks of the Russian land, when he drove out the fascist scum. It is the feet of honest, courageous people who have self-esteem, courage, and have no desire to be cattle, on which wipe their feet, rastusa from very different places. Why some of these places, our megaphones to shout not in a hurry. But very interestingly, the construction of the temple legs grow out of Albion, where and are inhabited the builders, the benefactors pre-lowered the country at $ 4 billion.
there is no sin besides from the fact that the man himself made
and there is no punishment except what a man himself did not want
and sin in turn is some error
so in theory that sinless people like that is, but there are practically no people who would not have made the mistakes and failures but did not understand them
so peck-peck.
- DILOR - wrote:
God has set for human standards of good and evil
Well, yeah, but not for nothing, I talked about the soul: its level of development defines human morality, and talking about a true moral basis, not of the society and upbringing, and the fact that *feel right*. Not all can feel it, apparently, does not listen to your gut...
- DILOR - wrote:
then he commits a sin
If you interpret the term wider look past religious teachings. You can be a believer without belonging to any religion (and probably do not understand). Again, true faith comes from within, not at the behest of the society, community, family or anyone. It is easier in contrast to moral principles: faith may not be ) Absolutely. Morality is always there, but forgotten, ignored. And faith is either there or not, rest is variation (deception, self-deception... in order selfish, according to family tradition or for some other reason).
MunchkiN 616 wrote:
sinless people
From the point of view of atheism, atheists are sinless people ツ
WanRoi wrote:
Well if people who have dedicated themselves to the service of God, call the civilian population, decorama and call apply power(physical with physical consequences!)
... What? For me it is and there are wicked people with an inflated ego/CDA. Both sides (fans of religion and atheists, the essence is the same).
WanRoi wrote:
And after these releases, no country has the right to continue to call itself a superpower.
Personally, I still don't understand who it is right: the Park should be left, or the temple still erect? -)
Gauguin wrote:
Just regardless, he acknowledges God or not, His laws continue to act on it.
Then it is clear.
Gauguin wrote:
What does it mean to live adequately?
Probably the opposite of inadequate ? 8) I do not mean from the point of view of religion or Church, but in General. About the benefit companies not just saying that.
Gauguin wrote:
And the benefit of society - a dubious criterion for the godly, on the contrary, the samples of living by faith trying to move away from the mundane.
And what pleases God? And why it is at odds with acceptable for society (what is the meaning of life, lol) ? )
Gauguin wrote:
a person is justified not...
Justified for what? For what they stole from the rich? Or killed someone at the behest of God? Different situation. Without generalizations. Examples.
PS
Why compare priests with doctors does not roll: the priests, as it were, intermediaries between mere mortals and the Almighty. So to them especially high (the highest!) requirements for all parameters of morality. And when among these are people are not very good for the same parameters, to wonder (from the word doubt): whether THEY are reputable as Mediators between Heaven and Earth?...
A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Justified for what?
Passion. Passion in itself is flawed, the action is quite extreme.
Gauguin wrote:
Rather In the ragged square, the status of which is below the average I want to build a temple with the subsequent landscaping of the remaining part of the square
So stunted that to the promotion of joined Nightingale diarrhea and every pop-raff. And then the riot police did not cope with fools who for some reason defend some kind of stunted square.
Gauguin wrote:
The Christian religion is the revelation of God
Yes, you are human. And some muslimskih chuchmeki do not agree with you
BezNika1
What is in common between soul and twists to control the stupid cattle? It looks like you are a proud representative of the latter.
Ave9 wrote:
There is no sin, all the invention of priests, closed topic - disagree.
it's your comments not mine. and what stratagem are you talking about ?
You mean only the sin of deceit.
But it is possible and without sin to think about killing your mother or father.
I have a car , for example if tomorrow I will crush your parent.
You would think that I have sinned ?
Spoilera want a lot to learn , but be kind, I continue to think the brain before you write something like that.
BezNika1
Teacher found, get diapers changed, sin does not exist in nature, all in a futile head insignificant man, all the terms and concepts of sin and other garbage you like all impose on society, the religious exercises in which you were born.
When I grow up - will understand what I mean. Although millions still remain in the form of embryos.
In this life I do not resort to ugly, perverse terms of the human mind, on the kind of sin.