Why incredibly slow on GTX1050ti? (Gears 5)
Wild brakes from the beginning. Vidyaha GTX1050ti, FX-6100, 8 GB RAM and a resolution of 1280x1024, should also on average to go, but regardless of the settings are almost slideshow FPS from 15 to 5 frames. Turned off as soon as the wires came down guys, just a gesture which logogram. People in the comments on the hands it goes on GTX1050 on FullHDChanged the frame on the processor and the thermal paste, now gives 35-40 fps on medium-high (recommended) you can play without noticeable brakes.. Steven Tyler was wrong about the fact that the curves for vin7 ported.
Zox-Zox wrote:
No, this is nonsense. The use of these giant field trips and zero percent. I had 7820x. After that I changed the platform and put the i5-9400F. The negative performance of some 1-2%. But before Fig saved. The memory was 32 gb 4600Mhz. I sold it too and put 12Gb 2666Mhz, with absolutely nothing to lose. What was the performance with 32 gb 4600Mhz, and has remained so. So I'm all for the Rockets. As animal power!
Shaw for Sanchez??? change 16 mass percent to some 6 production game, are you serious??? of RAM has decreased in 3 times almost, why??? as the rockets can replace the RAM and the lack of processor power??? it is simply impossible, if the percent of the hat, then at least 10 in conjunction 2080ти put it will be the weak point in the system still. You something to drive
Magnum 500 wrote:
Changed the frame on the processor and the thermal paste, now gives 35-40 fps on medium-high (recommended) you can play without noticeable brakes..
what is the frame on the percent??? 35-40 fps for you may be the norm, I drawdown from 60 to 55 feel even without any monitoring system, but put the 10 wines, there is in any case a couple of fps added
Zox-Zox wrote:
No, this is nonsense. The use of these giant field trips and zero percent. I had 7820x. After that I changed the platform and put the i5-9400F. The negative performance of some 1-2%. But before Fig saved. The memory was 32 gb 4600Mhz. I sold it too and put 12Gb 2666Mhz, with absolutely nothing to lose. What was the performance with 32 gb 4600Mhz, and has remained so. So I'm all for the Rockets. As animal power!
Shaw for Sanchez??? change 16 mass percent to some 6 production game, are you serious??? of RAM has decreased in 3 times almost, why??? as the rockets can replace the RAM and the lack of processor power??? it is simply impossible, if the percent of the hat, then at least 10 in conjunction 2080ти put it will be the weak point in the system still. You something to drive
Steve Taller
Plastic frame with bolts . Well, I drawdown from 60 to 30 but do not feel that below 30 is immediately evident. Ten put when all games will be released under her not a fashion. Gears 5 PTS like the old toy Invasion, one to one
Magnum 500 wrote:
Changed the frame on the processor and the thermal paste, now gives 35-40 fps on medium-high (recommended) you can play without noticeable brakes..
what is the frame on the percent??? 35-40 fps for you may be the norm, I drawdown from 60 to 55 feel even without any monitoring system, but put the 10 wines, there is in any case a couple of fps added
Magnum 500 wrote:
Ten put when all games will be released under her not a fashion.
sitting on 10 wines of 2015, are all games and even all the junk
Steve Taller
Plastic frame with bolts . Well, I drawdown from 60 to 30 but do not feel that below 30 is immediately evident. Ten put when all games will be released under her not a fashion. Gears 5 PTS like the old toy Invasion, one to one
Magnum 500 wrote:
I have yet to seven quite normal
+1 !!!
Spoilerish for Windows 7 2013, are all games and even all the old (which was on XP) !!!
Magnum 500 wrote:
Ten put when all games will be released under her not a fashion.
sitting on 10 wines of 2015, are all games and even all the junk
Magnum 500 wrote:
I have yet to seven quite normal
+1 !!!
Spoilerish for Windows 7 2013, are all games and even all the old (which was on XP) !!!
Steve Taller
No, I do not drive. I say that there is no difference in terms of percent and Opera. I'm not crazy to buy a computer, which is worse than previous performance. It's already a downgrade how it turns out) I wrote in a previous message that the difference is 1-2% For a lot of money back) Here, if the map to buy less, then, Yes, that is crazy!!! I do not argue. But my advice to you – buy the Rocket and the second 1080ti Performance of the year guaranteed!
I have on ultra settings in 1080p, the game flies on GTX1050ti in the open world, 30-40 fps in the premises of the stable 60, BUT I have a new computer bought for very expensive, just for the vidio card is not new enough( later will update) intel core i7 7700k Windows 10 Pro build 1903 with all the latest updates installed on the SSD along with the game. It I to what not all depends only on the vidio card.
Steve Taller
No, I do not drive. I say that there is no difference in terms of percent and Opera. I'm not crazy to buy a computer, which is worse than previous performance. It's already a downgrade how it turns out) I wrote in a previous message that the difference is 1-2% For a lot of money back) Here, if the map to buy less, then, Yes, that is crazy!!! I do not argue. But my advice to you – buy the Rocket and the second 1080ti Performance of the year guaranteed!
Steve Taller
Steve Taller wrote:
playing in 4K on ultra, resolution eats memory, not the Opera.
Oh well
If FHD eats more than 1280x1024
something about 4K generally silent
Steve Taller wrote:
1080ти do, in principle, Opera is not eating, she 11гиг their head missing
The thicker the card,the more it gets in games RAM.If you do not believe,with you screenshots to share
Spoiler
I have on ultra settings in 1080p, the game flies on GTX1050ti in the open world, 30-40 fps in the premises of the stable 60, BUT I have a new computer bought for very expensive, just for the vidio card is not new enough( later will update) intel core i7 7700k Windows 10 Pro build 1903 with all the latest updates installed on the SSD along with the game. It I to what not all depends only on the vidio card.
Steve Taller
Steve Taller wrote:
playing in 4K on ultra, resolution eats memory, not the Opera.
Oh well
If FHD eats more than 1280x1024
something about 4K generally silent
Steve Taller wrote:
1080ти do, in principle, Opera is not eating, she 11гиг their head missing
The thicker the card,the more it gets in games RAM.If you do not believe,with you screenshots to share
Spoiler
Zox-Zox wrote:
No, I do not drive. I say that there is no difference in terms of percent and Opera. I'm not crazy to buy a computer, which is worse than previous performance. It's already a downgrade how it turns out)
well, Yes, to change 7820х some 9400ф not downgrade)))
Zox-Zox wrote:
But my advice to you – buy the Rocket and the second 1080ti Performance of the year guaranteed!
I'm not crazy enough to believe in your nonsense, invidiosii Quad at all in games a bad show, and red rocket, which games were not created and that the games themselves can not work and even more so
Thomas Sevchenko wrote:
I have on ultra settings in 1080p, the game flies on GTX1050ti in the open world, 30-40 fps
30-40 fps for the shooter is very uncomfortable, better reduce the resolution
Thomas Sevchenko wrote:
BUT I have a new computer bought for very expensive, just for the vidio card is not new enough( later will update) intel core i7 7700k
to buy in 2019-m processor with 4 cores at high prices, are you serious?? would 5930к or 6850к took, they acceleration give 7700к in the soup