Nazism and nationalism. Is there a difference?

RussianQuaker
RussianQuaker wrote:
Let's put yourself vserazlichnyh aboriginal
Why don't you head up a wall? Just before take off that helmet with avatars, and change your nickname to amerikosovskih letters on the Russian.

Nazism - the ideology according to which a particular nation is more advanced in relation to other
To put it mildly,the same chubureki nichrome did not create and is not invented.All that are,absolutely everything created in other Nations.Only Allah Akbar screaming and cutting heads

stalker7162534 wrote:
Why don't you head up a wall? Just before take off that helmet with avatars, and change your nickname to amerikosovskih letters on the Russian.
Ass so hot? And the half I do not decree, as nick to write.

[Denis] wrote:
the same chubureki
He invented that? Probably nothing. Here are those who do not represent themselves, here they are the first and like the Nazis, they say I'm a finger banging mean a lot because my nation is more advanced.
RussianQuaker wrote:
And half not the boss of me,
You forgot to add - Heil Hitler.

RussianQuaker wrote:
Let's settle the aborigines on their territory, may th useful podcherpnul - fiction
Podzabyvat:
Evacuation in the USSR during the great Patriotic war — the large-scale displacement in the initial period of war with Germany from endangered areas in the Eastern regions of the country's population, industrial enterprises, cultural and scientific institutions, food supplies, raw materials and other material resources. Evacuation helped to keep the primary economic base and industrial potential of the country and became one of the factors contributing to winning the war.....

....The majority of the locals were good-arrived refugees. In particular, in Uzbekistan, where there was a movement for the adoption of the evacuated orphans, were placed 200 thousand children and teenagers left without parents. Widely known blacksmith from Tashkent, Sahmed Shamakhmudov and his wife Bahri, who adopted and brought 15 orphans.

[Denis] wrote:
To put it mildly,the same chubureki nichrome did not create and is not invented.
You shouldn't have said. As he is about the stalls with Shawarma (which by the way, cool turned, I saw myself:))))), not object.

stalker7162534 wrote:
He invented that? Probably nothing. Here are those who do not represent themselves, so they in the first place and like Nazism
Proof?

stalker7162534 wrote:
You forgot to add - Heil Hitler.
And I'm not obliged to love.

Vanya Rygalov wrote:
Podzabyvat:
Well, Yes, within the country, correct? Now podzabyvat, as Russian mass disappeared from the former (and not only) Soviet republics in 90-ies.

Patriotism - love of country.
Nationalism is the love for their nation, their culture, language, etc.
Chauvinism is the exaltation of nation, culture, language, etc over other Nations and cultures.
Nazism (national socialism) is a political totalitarian ideology of the Third Reich, advocating militarism, racism and anti-communism.

In fact, most of those who call themselves nationalists are actually chauvinists, because they consider their nation better than others and/or advocate for the reduction of the rights of national minorities in their country. Nationalism is constructive ideology, chauvinism - destructive, inciting ethnic strife and hatred.

Reverrius wrote:
Chauvinism is the exaltation of nation, culture, language, etc over other Nations and cultures.
Reasonable or unreasonable exalted exalted?

Reverrius wrote:
In fact, most of those who call themselves nationalists are actually chauvinists, because they consider their nation better than others and/or advocate for the reduction of the rights of national minorities in their country.
Someone migrants and national minorities.

RussianQuaker
Well, Hitler had justified the exaltation or not? It is important that chauvinism leads to wars and ethnic conflicts. This is akin to religious fanaticism, only worse. Because religion a person can choose himself, and what nationality you are born there.

Reverrius wrote:
Well, Hitler had justified the exaltation or not?
Depends what it is. Well, so thou hast expressed relates to unreasonable or justified?

Reverrius wrote:
It is important that chauvinism leads to wars and ethnic conflicts.
The best method of ethnic conflict - settle on the same territory cardinally different ethnic groups.

Reverrius wrote:
This is akin to religious fanaticism, only worse.
And why did you decide that it's always about nationality? For example, I don't care what nation captures my jobs and retail outlets. And now attention: how many Russians do you know who can say that they take jobs away or altered playgrounds, parks, squares under a car Park? You chauvinism is stupid if offended foreigner, it means because he is a foreigner, and he got in fact, you do not care, you're tolerant. The nation is not the cause but the ID of the most probable behavior, at least when I see someone in their territory. And if they live at home, I have no idea what I think about them.

Reverrius wrote:
Because religion a person can choose himself, and what nationality you are born there.
Really? Almost all religioznoye prefer to choose to officially endorse a religion, so that religion and nation are almost identical.I myself am a fool, of course, do not apply. And in the case of muslimskih ethnic groups, there is almost without exception in the minds of one specific religion sits.

RussianQuaker wrote:
Well, so thou hast expressed relates to unreasonable or justified?
And then chauvinism. Therefore applies to both cases.

RussianQuaker wrote:
You chauvinism is stupid if offended foreigner, it means because he is a foreigner, and he got in fact, you do not care, you're tolerant.
No, if he got just for the fact that he is that nation, which according to the striker, and to beat - it is chauvinism.

Reverrius wrote:
And then chauvinism. Therefore applies to both cases.
And if you say that one group of ethnic groups have contributed to science and the other not. This chauvinism? If Yes, it turns out that you have the same chauvinism natural state of things :)

Reverrius wrote:
No, if he got just for the fact that he is that nation, which according to the striker, and to beat - it is chauvinism.
Ie, if someone got for taking away jobs - you have it right?

RussianQuaker wrote:
And if you say that one group of ethnic groups have contributed to science and the other not. This chauvinism?
If to speak about other ethnic groups, as an independent expert - this is just your analysis of the development of science in the history of mankind. But if you say that your nation is more intelligent by nature than the other - it is chauvinism.

RussianQuaker wrote:
Ie, if someone got for taking away jobs - you have it right?
Violence in this situation is the method of cattle. Therefore, it is in any case is not normal. But chauvinism is not relevant.

Reverrius wrote:
If to speak about other ethnic groups, as an independent expert - this is just your analysis of the development of science in the history of mankind. But if you say that your nation is more intelligent by nature than the other - it is chauvinism.
And if you say that people are equal, is ridiculous and stupid. Even within the same tribe: is someone pissing in the hallways, someone moves the science forward. Objections? By the way, how do you explain that in the same ethnic group believe in nonsense, not all, and in others almost all the polls hit her head on the floor?

Reverrius wrote:
Violence in this situation is the method of cattle. Therefore, it is in any case is not normal. But chauvinism is not relevant.
A method nebydla in this situation?

In order:
stalker7162534
stalker7162534 wrote:
humanism
What is humanism?
stalker7162534 wrote:
Why people of our nation should be well and not all people must be good?
stalker7162534 wrote:
internationalism
Again, leftism. Let the government of another country cares that their people feel good.
People have different ethnicity, different culture. The clash of interests and values is inevitable. As an example - the Russians in the bulk of its not very beastly share Western European values. What to say about what some East.
Reverrius
Reverrius wrote:
Violence in this situation is the method of cattle.
It is very good that you are such a good, kind, civilized man. Only it is not necessary to measure all by itself. This is the fundamental error of humanism. Some without violence is simply impossible to explain that either. And...Oh the horror of such people among those migrants tueva hucha, as they say.

RussianQuaker wrote:
And if you say that people are equal, is ridiculous and stupid. Even within the same tribe: is someone pissing in the hallways, someone moves the science forward. Objections?
Compare two separate individuals and not two Nations. I judge people by their intelligence and looks, but not by blood. No need to think the herd and to row all under one comb.

RussianQuaker wrote:
A method nebydla in this situation?
I do not know nebydla, and adequate civilized people - certainly not to make a fight on every occasion.

Gauguin wrote:
It is very good that you are such a good, kind, civilized man. Only it is not necessary to measure all by itself. This is the fundamental error of humanism. Some without violence is simply impossible to explain that either.
I'm not a humanist. And Yes, there are those who hate understand. But I will never be violent to another person because of his skin color or nationality.

I choose nationalism. Now in Russia a dead end, so it doesn't matter if there's a difference.

Reverrius wrote:
Compare two separate individuals and not two Nations. I judge people by their intelligence and looks, but not by blood. No need to think the herd and to row all under one comb.
This is true, if you evaluate each one individually. And when you want to form an opinion about any community in General, it is more logical to do in the community as a whole. By the way, never said why one hit with his head to the floor almost the whole team, and others selectively.

And Yes, you personally have a lot of issue with imigrasi that in Russian two by four to make them an opinion based on intelligence and views?

Reverrius wrote:
I do not know nebydla, and adequate civilized people - certainly not to make a fight on every occasion.
So now on every occasion or quite significant?

Reverrius wrote:
I'm not a humanist.
Children starving in Africa I sympathize?

Reverrius wrote:
But I will never be violent to another person because of his skin color or nationality.
But because of the behavior and actions?

RussianQuaker wrote:
And when you want to form an opinion about any community in General, it is more logical to do in the community as a whole.
Only herd-minded people will make an opinion on the community as a whole.

RussianQuaker wrote:
By the way, never said why one hit with his head to the floor almost the whole team, and others selectively.
This may depend on the socio-economic situation, we have in the example is hoenicka areas to have more pals than in other areas of the city, but that is no reason to assume all city or all on the area - Gopnik.

RussianQuaker wrote:
And Yes, you personally have a lot of issue with imigrasi that in Russian two by four to make them an opinion based on intelligence and views?
No, but I don't have anything against them because of their national or racial differences.

RussianQuaker wrote:
Children starving in Africa I sympathize?
Sincere sympathy can only be from individual to individual. When I see photos or video of a particular starving child from Africa - I felt for him.

RussianQuaker wrote:
But because of the behavior and actions?
Possible.