Were the Americans on the moon?
Dispense with preliminaries and foreplay.Here is the reason why the Americans could not fabricate the video:
In 2009, the fortieth anniversary of the flight of Apollo 11 automatic interplanetary station LRO executed a special assignment — spent surveying the areas of landings of lunar modules earth expeditions.
And here fotochki
Let's discuss the main arguments of the conspiracy theorists.
The pictures are too many inconsistencies, cocok
Here all the arguments: http://www.skeptik.net/conspir/moonhoax.htm
Radiation belt cocok
This belt starts from 400 to 1300 km depending on longitude. There is a second belt at an altitude of 17,000 km, but it is weaker. Astronauts on Gemini 11 went up to 1300 km, but for some reason didn't die. The Soviet Union launched turtles living around the moon, but they also survived, a miracle probably.
And pachimu the booster of the Saturn 5, the most powerful in history, is no longer used? Kok
The launch of a proton - about $ 70 million. Launch Saturn 5 - 1 billion 200 million dollars. I hope it is clear.
Saturn 5 never existed ahahah
Yeah. The station skayleb, which were raised by this booster is also never existed. And the fact that it was visible from Earth with the naked eye it's nothing.
And I Ani balshe militat? kokk
Question section I'm an idiot. First, Voyager 2 flew over Uranus in 1986, but there is no one more puciato fiction. Galileo went to Jupiter in 1995, but pochemuto there no one else was. And so on. Second, the program was closed due to lack of funding. The cost of the program was 22 billion dollars(the money of those times). It is very much clear that more money nobody will give.
And pachimu not litut right now? You can also slitti huh?
No you can not. Too expensive. And it is unnecessary to explore Mars much more effective.
I like the flag developing Ms. there is no wind.
Imagine for a moment that everything was shot in pavilione. From then indoors the wind? Do not you think that you are a young conspiracy theorist, an idiot? And, as for reason, it is many times spend too much time that I'm not even going to mention it.
And one more thing. In one of the expeditions of an astronaut conducted experiments. He dumped simultaneously from the same height, a feather and a stone. They fell at the same time. It turns out that this forge is required in all Studio air pump? Is this too much?
han298
The ISS has cost about $ 100 billion (two launches to the moon). But on the ISS astronauts don't just sit and do scientific work. But science is good for humanity. What can make two people on the moon for another couple of days? Obviously that shovels they're helium 50 billion does not dig. (and not a single state did not want to single-handedly pull such a big station like the ISS. For example, the pensions of all pensioners of the Russian Federation for the year of about $120 billion)
han298
You really don't understand why the helium 3 mined on the moon now do not fucking need?
kile[Natural sick all over the country one such]
You have the right nick. And I'm not going to waste time on such nonsense, stupid American blogger. I want to believe in something that was not - Believe! )
Porsche911GT3RS
nonsense stupid American blogger
Are you talking about?
And I'm not going to waste time
I'm not surprised. To read is very difficult.
I want to believe in something that was not
Believe it's just you.
stalker7162534
kile[Natural sick all over the country one such]
You seriously don't see that I agree with you about the fact that it is unprofitable? I do not mean it say that, if you haven't noticed. A question about why they don't launch this rocket into space today I have already removed a couple of posts ago. You're stuck in your little world and trying to prove to me that I'm wrong. I have even on some of the posts don't know how to react. For example:
Spoiler, so you yourself can not understand... Clearly.I'm just saying that the US government is easier to plunder the defense money. There is always over there, and very decent. And science, Americans do not want to move for a better tomorrow... They need a profit. In occasion of the first flight - and all so clear. It had to be that you******smiling to the USSR. So most likely, Yes, they were there, is not the only example of overspending of the state budget, to be the first in any field, albeit with questionable benefit.
P. S. Heard, by the way, somewhere that we came up with some sort of space program how to get Helium-3 on the moon as early as 2020, going to this idea to bring to life... Is the question that moon Helium-3 fucking useless...
han298
No one argues that the moon race was purely political. Likewise, the first satellite launched for the sake of political prestige. Our scientists told the Politburo that the Americans want to be the first to launch a satellite. And in agreement with our their scientists assured his government that the Russians are going to launch a satellite first. And away we go.
Spoilers come on, when they speak on scientific topics, to approach the question is not biased. Well teach you to treat America negatively. But this is not an argument in conversations.
To mine helium 3 on the moon, now there is no way. And not cost-effective.
han298
I agree with you
Well.
A question about why they don't launch this rocket into space today I have already removed a couple of posts ago
What questions do you still have?
And science, Americans do not want to move for a better tomorrow
And what country moves science a bright future.
Heard, by the way, somewhere that we came up with some sort of space program how to get Helium-3 on the moon as early as 2020, going to this idea to bring to life
This is the tale of the uncle of the Russian space Agency. Such a thing is seriously not necessary.
stalker7162534
so is that your favorite pastime is to come and whine topic, arranging stuffing good seska and bad Russia. so don't you whine on the subject.
yaschitayu that Americans blame ASUS zenfone rasiya ranked last in health care and I believe that will take longer the last places everywhere, patriot
Alextar wrote:
to come and whine topic, arranging stuffing good seska and bad Russia.
lying and not blush. quote me to support their bullshit. you're not the first time the lie. are you stupid or just a Troll?
stalker7162534
And come on, when they speak on scientific topics, to approach the issue impartially. Well teach you to treat America negatively. But this is not an argument in conversations.
Here is why written I do not understand... First of all, I did not notice in what place the addressed scientific topic... I would rather say that we discussed the financial and political problems. Yes, and you're in their judgment, it should be noted, well ooooochen unbiased...)
To mine helium 3 on the moon, now there is no way. And unprofitable.
However, on earth it is also unprofitable, because it is actually a little... But if someone can figure out how to get it on the moon without any cost... Then the Helium-3 may repeat the fate of oil on planet Earth, in particular if it learns to use as nuclear fuel.
kile[Natural sick all over the country one such]
This is the tale of the uncle of the Russian space Agency. Such a thing is seriously not necessary.
I agree with this only in 2020, if there is no result.
han298
han298 wrote:
I agree with this only in 2020, if there is no result.
MOSCOW, 10 APR 2014 — RIA Novosti. Russia plans to permanently gain a foothold on the moon, said Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who oversees the defense and aerospace industry.
https://ria.ru/space/20140410/1003393642.html
29, 2015 From the updated version of the Federal space program for 2016-2025 (BFC) were crossed almost all the work for manned flights to the moon.
http://izvestia.ru/news/600626
han298 wrote:
Here is why written I do not understand...
It was a response to
han298 wrote:And science, Americans do not want to move for a better tomorrow... They need a profit.
29, 2015 From the updated version of the Federal space program for 2016-2025 (BFC) were crossed almost all the work for manned flights to the moon.
Almost, but not all.
Спойлерwww.roscosmos.ru/22347/
In particular, the quote from the article:
Spoilerage the Program provides for the creation of the necessary basis for full-scale exploration of the moon after 2025 and the implementation, by 2030, of landing a man on the moon.
This is the tale of some uncle from the Russian space Agency. Such a thing is seriously not necessary.
And where you here see tales? Can only agree with the fact that the terms of the program pushed...
It was a response to
han298 wrote:And science, Americans do not want to move for a better tomorrow... They need a profit.
Let's start with the fact that it is taken out of the text, and other comments. And here's my post completely, which you supposed was to answer:
Spoilered here why written I do not understand... First of all, I did not notice in what place the addressed scientific topic... I would rather say that we discussed the financial and political problems. Yes, and you're in their judgment, it should be noted, well ooooochen unbiased...)
And here's your phrase that provoked me to write the above:
Spoilers come on, when they speak on scientific topics, to approach the issue impartially. Well teach you to treat America negatively. But this is not an argument in conversations.
So I don't know what you want from me. One phrase you're trying to census and attached to a variety of my statements... And do you think I have a problem with the argument?o_0
PS by the Way, the current right now realized that you misspelled.
Spoilers come on, when they speak on scientific topics, to approach the issue impartially. Well teach you to treat America negatively. But this is not an argument in conversations.
So there you are on the contrary about bias wanted to say, I know...)
han298 wrote:
The Program also envisages creating the necessary basis for full-scale exploration of the moon after 2025 and the implementation, by 2030, of landing a man on the moon.
han298 wrote:
I agree with this only in 2020, if there is no result.
Well, you learned that in 2020 will not be our base on the moon. that's good.
Spoilertv for science and profit, for people and studying the nature (doing science) to get a profit from this.
and what you wrote in the United States, due to the fact that you have planted a negative attitude to the us
There were, of course. For brought and the soil (that was given to research and ours) and research etc.
The rest is conspiracy theories.
han298
Do you know why fairy tales? That would be something to make you want to start. How to land on the moon, when nothing began to be developed? Only super-heavy rocket began to work out