Graphics settings that are better off (Fallout 4)
Everyone knows that in big cities, FPS on most computers sags just to unplayable, so I decided to take the time to find the very setting that is best not to use at all.And I came to the conclusion that this is the distance for drawing shadows. I do not know what the problem is, but it is by lowering this setting that the dips in the FPS disappear. The rest of the settings do not significantly affect these dips.
This is how it looks in my case.
My bundle is i5 4440 + gtx 970
ps (December 14). found a test comparing two processors in this game. i5 3rd generation vs i7 5th.
either the game needs streams or cache. and maybe it's even in the ozu.
KlementXX
Yes, I read it carefully !!! As for the 670 - for three years, do not make my ears laugh) I myself test computers almost every day. The people are already not enough 970th, and you prove to me about the ancient, so also the middle! Run the same witcher on ultra and at high resolutions I will look))) 4Gb is getting close, and you have 2Gb, don't talk nonsense! Yesterday I tested 680 and 960 on average in full HD, for a year it will be enough somehow. No, well, of course, maybe you are one of these: "I'm playing at a resolution of 1024 by 768 at the lowest settings and 20-25 fps is enough for me" Then the flag is in your hands. Yes, start any modern game, well, for example, where the defense is "given". Just don't say that it is not optimized, therefore it slows down. We know such nonsense, passed)))
MunchkiN 616
He believes that his pitch will last for many more years. It is not easier to buy 970-980 or 980TI on the barnych, people are selling them, because Pascal came out, or you can buy a new 1070, well, nakraynyak 1060. They are not that expensive already. And enjoy a normal, productive, stable bakery!
in this game, made by 12 curved-arm monkeys, fps comes out of bugs in the game, and when they do not appear, then everything flies at ultra settings on a 960 map
MU-admin
Finally a sober person has appeared! Young people believe that the problem is in the map .... well, well. Two gigabytes of memory they say is not enough. You guys are dilettantes. Amateurs are self-confident, believing that they know absolutely everything and everything, but at the same time write with errors. This category is well known in the open spaces no ... Two gigabytes of memory for this trash, for the eyes. Well, if of course you like to 'admire the sunset' to the fullest, then for this you can sell an apartment and buy a computer like in the Pentagon. It's even safer to buy cards every half a year. Burn old and take new ones ... then there will always be something to brag about, and keep up with the fashion. And if you play everything and indiscriminately, then this option is a priority. But I don't want to change my top, battle-tested map / for now its term will not come / for the sake of the curve of the Bethesda money-beater. By the way, to trump "here I’m testing computers, I’m coolâ€
ps And who could have guessed that the solution to all problems (well, or almost all) is a computer for 150-200 pieces! It remains only to figure out where to get them!