Graphics settings that are better off (Fallout 4)

Yes, there are drawdowns in the area of ​​the Mass Fusion Tower. Thanks, I'll try.

Yes, even from 970 in suburban areas once dropped to 18 frames And 95% of the time stable 60 frames. I will turn off the distance of rendering of shadows, mb and the truth will be better

I take it the gazebo is in no hurry to treat its abortion victim? Well, is not it nonsense with such soap and also reduce the settings on the GTX 970? Optimizon is included in the season pass

EvgenyDMT
So how are you really better to be silent - at least a little like people become like
MunchkiN 616
It's only about the fact that an individual is babbling about some kind of radiant sun, not seeing the difference between the heavenly body and the calculated light source))

eroppo
for the sun and moon, the calculation of shadows is different from point light sources. And from ordinary light sources there like on defolny ulra finally there are no shadows. overlap only.
specifically regarding the rays of the graphone - I do not know how much it eats or does not eat. On the idea of ​​ u200b u200bthe whole load on the GPU is made by the range of drawing and the distance of drawing shadows, respectively, and the grass.

FireDragonS Have

you even left the shelter? or one of those who stumbled for five minutes on the forum to pose as an expert?

To everyone else, I can say that the rays of light can affect something, but in my case below 60 fps, it practically does not sit down either day or night or in the rain, in short everywhere. And what happens above 60 fps, I don’t know because I didn’t decipher the FPS, or rather I did it, but I returned it back, because there are also bugs with the FPS unlocking, and I didn’t go into much, I have enough and 60 fps.
All timings change and everything is too reactive. It's not very good for me.

drobilka
For a long time already. I have been playing since the release, and this is almost a month, after all)

FireDragonS

I see no reason to prove something, absolutely everyone complains about drawdowns in the Diamond City area, but you don't have one.
Perhaps you are the chosen one.

Even I have the same FPS on the ultra, with or without rays.
drobilka
I do not have it either, I am also the chosen one!

I met only one building where it was lagging, but not in Diamond City. Although the counter showed 60 fps, it seemed as if there were 15.

drobilka
Not for me alone. The problem is well known, but here you are already lucky. Apparently, I gave 60 dollars for a reason.

With my config, rays do not really affect. It seems to me that the biggest lags are definitely not from the rays. I caught the lowest frame rate in one of the dungeons, in the corridor near the exit. Either the fog is to blame (vryatli, because on this engine the fog is just an animated object that does not take into account physics, you can even move it with the console), or there are slots on some parts of the map, because of which the game has to calculate huge spaces and shadows there, or behind the map contains a cluster of objects that they forgot to remove when building a level.

drobilka
I will say briefly, thanks for the advice on shadows, in the city the FPS has risen !!! by the way, on the rays, personally in my wasteland, during the day, the fps keeps 70-90, the rays are at low, I turn on ultra, minus 20 fps .....

Specially made three skins: "ultra", "ultra but medium rays" and "ultra but average quality of shadows and their range", at the location everyone knows. 72fps is ultra but medium rays, 48fps is ultra but average quality of shadows and their range, 40fps is ultra.









drobilka
By the way, why do you have anti-aliasing and low quality of shadows disabled on the second video?

The trick is that the FPS does not fall, but stupidly jams. And as far as I noticed, byada with lighting. While cloudy, rain, night, fog, etc., everything is fine. A sunny day begins, or in buildings where there are many lamps, periodic twitches begin, that is, there is no.
At the same time, the lighting does not even have the minimum settings, the lowest are medium. And you can't turn it off at all. )
The rest of the settings do not affect at all, the only thing on the ultra is my FPS falls, because the RAM is only 4GB.
Traditionally, the rendering range in the launcher. The range should be set high, not the maximum, the detail of the range is low. The two options below the sliders are which. The engine seems to be new, the sores are still the same. )
But with the lighting, they were too clever. Already two patches have been released, the problem has not been solved.

All fps plant rays, in watts with max rays in forests subsidence up to 8-15 fps average rays 35-45 Gtx 770

All FPSs plant rays
This is the first to turn off. In general, until the problem with lighting is resolved, it is better to turn off the parameters affecting lighting. Apart from glare, they have no effect. But the rays, CCAO, TAA, volumetric light, it is better to cut out. Podlagivaet less and less often, but it does not solve the problem at all.

there is a minimum of many settings, and resources are inadequate, apparently the developers no longer know how to force players to buy new video cards

apparently the developers no longer know how to get players to buy new video cards
Not only the developers. N-vidia also sins with this. For example, the same GTA5. There was also a whole bundle of problems. Two months after the release, the drivers were released, and now it flutters .. despite the fact that the hardware is still the same, and the patches are the same. And so it is constantly.
Now the driver was on December 1st. A new driver will be released for the new year that will fix most of the problems.

EvgenyDMT
You prescribed cartridges for yourself in the console, chitak))))

drobilka
This is how it looks in my case.
My bundle is i5 4440 + gtx 970
Why do you have 8 cores?